b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6230162

I've just seen a bloke
kick the car door of someone who was driving whilst talking on his phone.

Whilst I agree the car driver is an inconsiderate cnut, does that seem a little excessive?

Discuss
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:02, archived)
I'd take his car door off and hit him back with it.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:03, archived)
THIS SONG IS A BIT RUDE
in an early hip hop "ooh" kind of way
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:03, archived)
get this, when I see someone on the phone I kick them in the head.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:03, archived)
Just on the phone in general?
What if someone's phoning an ambulance?
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
they'll have even more reason for the ambulance

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
*Standing ovation*

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:16, archived)
Vigilantes are the best people in the world.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:03, archived)
...for the last time you're not Batman MoT.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
Then how do you explain my cave?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:07, archived)
That's a carboard box in your garden...

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
and all my kick ass gadgets?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:09, archived)
Pencil case with various rulers and felt tips...

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:11, archived)
and my girlfriend, catwoman?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:12, archived)
Your mum, fat woman.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
... shit.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:15, archived)
It's ok *rubs shoulders*

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:15, archived)
I ran a jay walker over last night.
And kept going.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:03, archived)

ja ro
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
It's good but it's not right

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
i nearly got run over today
chatting on my blackberry walked across the pedestrian crossing when it was on red.

oops

i was a bit embarrassed
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:26, archived)
I'd get out of my car and kick him in the phone

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
Did he leave a dent
Or was it just a little *thunk*?

If he kicked with intent to dent, then yes, taking it a tad too far.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
My car is dented to fuck all ready because I like to pretend it's a spitfire.
I've sped past a cyclist and slapped his lyrca arse before as he pushed past and bent my wingmirror. I shouted back "PEEEEOW DON'T TRY AND SQUEEZE PAST YOU CUNT!"
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:07, archived)
Haha clicked

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
if he crashes/knocks someone over, it'll probably hurt his car worse.
I wouldn't kick a moving car, that seems a bit mental.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
the kicker was a motorbike
but both were stationary when it happened
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)
They both sound like inconsiderate tossers if you ask me.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:07, archived)
Probably cut him up earlier.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
this
its nothing to do with the mobile phone
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:44, archived)
What if you're both moving at the same speed?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
even batman had to start somewhere

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
I'm going to steal that.
And try to make money from it.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:04, archived)
Too far
but he'll probably think twice about doing it again.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
I'd push him into a nettle bush

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
you spelt cunt wrong

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:05, archived)
jenpots; always ready to finger a bad cunt

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)
:oD
It's the only spelling I will point out. If you're gonna swear, you might as well do it properly.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:11, archived)
Maybe he's a history buff
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cnut_the_Great
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
when i see someone on the phone when driving i get so angry i have to pull over and cry

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)

+myself
ver and cry ff
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:07, archived)
Hang on
If the bloke was driving how did the bloke kick the car?

Was the car stopped at some lights? Or did the bloke run really fucking fast alongside the car so he could kick it?

More detail required.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)
...
b3ta.com/talk/6230190

The car had pulled out in front of the bike, then stopped a few yards further up at a junction
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:09, archived)
but was the door open, or what?
I can't work out how you can kick a car door off while it's shut.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:12, archived)
OF ONE F

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
what?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
"Kicked the door of someone"
not "kicked the door off..."
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:15, archived)
Oh.
Suddenly this thread is less interesting.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
Pfft

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
Ah, see,
important bit of info. So it was more about the biker being cut up than the phone thing.

I'd probably have kicked the car as well. Or at least called him a cunt.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
No...
he was shouting at him about being on his phone, inferring, I thought, that he cut him up because he was on the phone
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
I'm finding this amazing how people cannot just understand this from the off from your first post.
Use your common sense people!
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)
it seems impressive.
I can't imagine how that's even possible.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:06, archived)
It seems stupid
Unless he has a really powerful kick.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:08, archived)
Wait a minute -
Did you say he was on a bike?

Did he dismount and kick, or kick from the bike?
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:12, archived)
I once punched a bus for driving right past my bus stop
This achieved nothing.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:12, archived)
You needed a Honda Accord, I think.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
I've thought about getting one
But I'm scared the power will go to my head and I'll go crazy and be pinning people to walls all over the country. I imagine Kim Jong Il has a Honda accord
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)

www.b3ta.com/talk/4193358
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:23, archived)
I was behind a Honda Accord yesterday
And the driver actually shook his fist out the window at someone. I was quite scared.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:24, archived)
I did that,
And it hurt a lot.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:14, archived)
It took me two missed buses to realise the sign on the stop that said
"Bus stop out of order."
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:22, archived)
anyone who is actually too distracted by a phone conversation
to drive safely is a fucking retard that shouldn't be allowed cutlery unaided, let alone a licence to pilot a potentially lethal tonne of machinery at speed.

/LOLMGControversial
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:13, archived)
Speed limits are bollocks too.
I can go much faster than the speed limit.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:14, archived)
Speed limits were made ages ago when cars were much shitter than they are.
You can safely go 20 miles an hour faster that 70 on the motorway.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
Oh, I agree
but sadly, Dumfies and Galloway Court didn't. So now I'm poor.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
This is true,
although any crash that does happen would be much worse. And fuel economy would be terrible.
The 55mph speed limits in the US were introduced during the fuel crisis, because that was the most economical speed to drive at.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
That's the main reason the limits won't be increased (the fuel, not the crashes)
Crashes would be much worse, but apart from ones in trafic jams I'd assume that most accidents on motorways occur at higher speeds than 70mp/h already
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)
they probably do,
but if the limit was 90, people would drive at 110.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:22, archived)
I don't think so.
People drive at over 70 miles an hour because they feel safe doing so. I'm not sure how many people's cars would feel safe when in excess of 100 miles an hour so I don't think many people would do it.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:24, archived)
People drive at over 70 because they're impatient.
Besides, plenty of people have cars that can cope with going over 100 these days, all the fancy BMWs and stuff that's on the road these days. Maybe not your family hatchbacks, but having two classes of cars that go at different speeds would introduce dangers of its own. And we've already got the lorries and coaches that can't really go much faster.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:28, archived)
I already do.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:39, archived)
what about sending a text?

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:15, archived)
If we're being serious, I'd think that's too much, as you need to look at the screen to do that.
I find it quite interesting though, my phone is my satnav. So by the letter of the law, I can legally program that whilst driving but not use it as a phone. Even though it amounts to doing the same thing.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:17, archived)
Controversial: maybe.
True: yes.

Unless phoning for an ambulance. But then that's what speakerphone/handsfree is for.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:15, archived)
Or the side of the road
while stationary.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:20, archived)
Precisely
As surely if you're phoning for an ambulance it'll be either for you, your passenger, or someone at the side of the road.

If the ambulance is for you then you shouldn't even be driving.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:23, archived)
I'm disappointed, Flappers
no fucker is arguing with me. What's the point of posting something borderline ridiculous if people aren't going to get shouty?
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:24, archived)
I'm officially one of those safety nazis
so I'm prevented by the terms of my job contract from disagreeing with even the most hysterical pro-driving-safety viewpoint
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:38, archived)
The problem is there are just too many laws governing what we can & can't do
people aren't stupid, just poorly trained.
Driving lessons should include speeding whilst on the phone & smoking with a can of Tennants Super between your legs. If they are a recreational drug user they should also be on their drug of choice.
Once they can do this with no problems they pass their test & we can get rid of all these silly laws.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:19, archived)
You forgot the other trick
Driving with your bare feet while changing a shirt after a four-hour drive from Cardiff.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:20, archived)
I reckon you should have to do more advanced stuff,
like how to control a skid. What you learn in driving lessons as they are is all well and good as long as nothing goes wrong.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:21, archived)
Yup, can't argue with that

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:25, archived)
yeah
but if anything useful about car control was actually taught, then loads of mouth-breathers would never pass their tests. And then oh fucking christ, what would we do, all people have the RIGHT to drive their fat arses everywhere and screw the safety of the rest of the population.

I know people who struggle to tie their shoelaces but have driving licences. Terrifying.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:27, archived)
I disagree on the "stupid" thing.
if you need to be trained to drive properly, you aren't cut out to drive. It should be second nature. You should be able to have a million distractions going on and still notice the bike coming down the inside out of the corner of your eye, but it should be subconscious, not learned. Bar the actual "how to operate a motor vehicle" part of driving lessons, anyone that needs training should simply be banned from driving. Cuts accidents and congestion at a stroke.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:23, archived)
Age old debate here...
But what's the age at which you have to re-take a driving test? Is it over 75?
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:25, archived)
It should be 30.
seeing how anyone over that age is old.

Although, in all seriousness, I think that people who took their tests a significant time ago (ie when roads were less crowded and cars were less technologically advanced) should have to take a stripped down test.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:27, archived)
Agreed
I was about to say something along those lines; not because older people are incapable drivers or anything, but because factors change such as car prowess and brake reaction distance as one ages.

My grandad's 73 and hasn't had a re-test yet, he's in the pinnacle of health but his driving definitely isn't what it used to be.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:29, archived)
that's nonsense,
nobody ever gets really good at anything without training and a lot of practice.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:25, archived)
You might have noticed I'm not being entirely serious here.
but, for the purposes of following through with it

training and practice for car control, yes, I agree. If you need training and practice to spot other road users, or rapidly process the number of possible scenarios involving these other users, and take appropriate action, then driving isn't something you should be doing. i.e., if you need to consciously think at all, even for a millisecond, to be able to drive safely, then you shouldn't be doing it. It doesn't need to be taught.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:31, archived)
I don't know how you do teach that sort of thing, to be honest,
but it's like a sort of habitual thought. Practice can get you into the habit, and then it becomes second nature.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:33, archived)
It's what the hazard perception test is supposed to be there for.

(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:33, archived)
I saw a bad accident yesterday involving 3 cars* and a tractor
How anyone can not see a tractor is beyond me.

*It might have just been 2 cars and the third was there to help before the police came.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:26, archived)
What had happened
Had both cars hit the tractor, or had one car hit the tractor then the other car gone into the back of the first?
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:35, archived)
YEAH
Stop training atheletes because their athletisism is second nature. Musicians should never study as it is second nature.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:29, archived)

ician lim
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:30, archived)
for the purposes of argument
apart from the fact than I'm not arguing this seriously, separate driving into two parts: Car control, which of course you must learn and practice, and inate common sense, which if you have to practice or train then you shouldn't drive.

Does that make more sense? In the same way that you train as a musician in order to "control" the instrument, but you can't train your natural ability to know what sounds good and what doesn't.
(, Tue 16 Jun 2009, 13:35, archived)