b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10662997 (Thread)

# What's happy toast done now?
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:05, archived)
#
nothing. nothing at all...
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:07, archived)
# this chap has taken offence
because I mentioned his repeated tinfoil hat/illuminati/aren't big corporations naughty posts on links board were getting tiring.
I also disagreed with his belief that piracy is the way forward and can only end in happiness for everyone.

But I think it was my pointing out that he hadn't donated that really upset him.

I however will not be posting goading pictures of him as a response as I have better things to do. Toodle pip
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:09, archived)
#
heh
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:10, archived)
# meh
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:11, archived)
# teh
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:13, archived)
#
oh come on. do a provocative picture of ham with a tin foil hat on. go on!
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:14, archived)
# ^ attention seeking cunt
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:25, archived)
# He's got form...
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:26, archived)
# sopa does need to be stopped though
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:27, archived)
# I don't think anyone is denying that
even half the people behind sopa think it's fucking ridiculous.

(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:30, archived)
# I agree
though I think Wikipedia and friends' "protest" is both facile and pointless, and is most likely to convince bosses around the world that productivity really does go up if people can't get onto Wikipedia. And in the meantime, the American lawmakers will carry on regardless (meaning SOPA won't go through anyway - though God knows what will happen next year.)
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:32, archived)
# I might just drop this here
not that it has a particular point to make but more because it's wiki's 24 hour protest that got in the way of me clicking a wiki link further down the board.



But yes, SOPA is gash.

edit- that probably would've gone better further down. Ahh hindsight
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:33, archived)
# ahaha
clicked
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:37, archived)
#
I feel it could've done with an elipsis before the 'plausible'
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:41, archived)
# heh :)
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:39, archived)
# had to be done
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 10:17, archived)
# woooo!
found him/it
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 10:30, archived)
# Take that, James Wales!
When you go to a wiki page, it flashes the content before you get the black page. If you're *really* quick with the print screen button, you can still read it. The top bit anyway.
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 12:32, archived)
# I totally agree.
But only because it is extreme and the fall out will be ultimately harmful. There are already laws in place that protect against piracy, and rightly so IMHO. I have great sympathy for people whose livelihood is creative, and then get ripped off.
Often however it is 'big business' that is screwing small guys, whilst ripping off ideas that should have intellectual protection and recycling them in adverts etc for corporate gain.
Unfortunately 'America' (and I don't want to use lazy stereotyping of 'Americans') has a habit of attempting to impose its will on the rest of the world when it has no legal, moral or ethical right to do so.
Priciples of intellectual protection? good. SOPA? bad. Murdoch? self interested cunt of the highest order.
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:34, archived)
# indeed *smokes pipe* :)
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:38, archived)
# Agreed.
Especially on the part where it's just another example of big businesses screwing the small guys, mainly because they have the power and money to be this influential and are using it to be even more influential.

But they just can't be trusted to have and maintain the right morals and motives to hold such power.
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:54, archived)
# Standard Operating Proceedure.
Make an insanely ridiculous set of laws that include the thing you want that looks nasty but ultimately isn't as insane as the whole set of laws

await protest

say "lol, my bad" water down original proposal "heh, I guess you guys won huh?"

Pass seemingly watered down set of laws that include the specific stuff you want.

Either that or attach the law to legislation on lard manufacturing that MUST be passed or there will be a lard manufacturing crisis internationally or sneak it by in some similar way.

the system works
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 10:37, archived)
# For a dull spammy mouthbreather, you sure do know how to keep fighting a losing battle.
This is great internet, btw. Keep it up.
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:26, archived)
# Ha! great username :)
...now contribute to keep a free website going in the face of internet censorship!
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:28, archived)
# Sorry, I'm too busy pissing and moaning and being pointless or something
/ham
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:30, archived)
# This
Great username
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 10:15, archived)
# Is it a tactile exhibition?
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:11, archived)
# *gets*
*applauds*
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:27, archived)
# *rereads*
*now gets*
*applauds too*
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:39, archived)
# :)
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 9:45, archived)
# that's because you're a secret illuminati tinfoil manufacturer
:D
(, Wed 18 Jan 2012, 10:32, archived)