b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 1078417 (Thread)

# Back to the drawing board for the invisible zebra project


Click pic for bigger
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:30, archived)
# oh now that is
really really lovely
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:31, archived)
# i concur
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:32, archived)
# i concur
with your concurring, and now i'm off to bed.
nytol.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:33, archived)
# night
sleep well
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:34, archived)
# I
concur the concuring which is concur squared or supercur

have a woo yay with that bollocks
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:35, archived)
# it shows that the mind only needs very little information to create a full picture
of stuff :)
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:36, archived)
# ?????
though I know that the eyes take in more information than the largest telescopes
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:39, archived)
# you can get aay with drawing a few squiggles
and other ppl can interpret them as long as you give them a fairly good context etc.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:43, archived)
# very nice!
: )
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:32, archived)
# Oooo. I say.
Zebra's are the new kittens.

Mmmmm.
And on that lovely picture, I'm off to bed. No f5ing, so see you all tomorrow night probably.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:33, archived)
# so
would cats be the old kittens

badum tsshh
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:38, archived)
# have as much woo and yay as i can get my hands on at this time of night
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:33, archived)
# !
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:33, archived)
# You better wipe that away
with a houplachief
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:37, archived)
# oooh,
not long now before I get to post my second ever celebration of the number of posts I have posted.
Or something.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:40, archived)
# excellant
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:34, archived)
# spocktackruler?
tenuous....but funny. i might start saying it like that now.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:35, archived)
# haha!
thanks for spelling it out for me - I was stuck!
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:38, archived)
# ohh, that's nice
if I could get my new David St Hubbins wooyay to upload, it would be ...


*here*
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:34, archived)
# Mentions of Spinal Tap
deserve a woo yay just for that.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:37, archived)
# i wholeheartedly agree.
it is the best film ever.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:39, archived)
# Anyone seen the sequel
Return Of Spinal Tap? Top quality, though more of a gig than a comedy, but great songs and hillarious.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:42, archived)
# i haven't
but did you know they have to do something under the name spinal tap every 3 years to keep the copyright. hence, return of, break like the wind album, simpsons episode....
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:45, archived)
# Really?
That's pretty odd- is it like that for all bands or just because they're fictional?
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:50, archived)
# sounds a bit rum
but it would account for the IBM ads ... that and the huge stacks of cash
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:54, archived)
# its all true
its not like they need the money. well harry shearer doesn't anyway, but they do it to keep the name
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:01, archived)
# I wouldn't imagine Christopher Guest does either
... what with being Lord Christopher Haden-Guest and married to Jamie Lee Curtis.

Anyway, that's enough of my pish for one evening. I'm off.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:12, archived)
# I have indeed
Christopher Guest has a new film coming out soon ... the three of them are in it playing members of some sort of folk band.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:56, archived)
# You mean
like at the beginning end of The Return? Ace. Stupid question but do they really play the songs because they're fantastic ^_^

Off to bed, night all.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:59, archived)
# nope
it's not a Tap film, but all the usual suspects are in it.

yes, they do play the music - as they do in this new one.
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:09, archived)
# Have a Derek Smalls one
to keep you going
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 5:14, archived)
# I did some invisible animals once.... but nobody noticed ;)
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:35, archived)
# Ba-dum









tish!
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:38, archived)
# ooooh...
that is rather lovely... :-)
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 1:35, archived)
# Yay!
It might be a relative of this one (which only works 50% of the time - A bit like me...)

(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:02, archived)
# woo!
that's marvellarse that is!

And on that note, I'll be off to bed. G'night all
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:04, archived)
# G'
nite
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 2:10, archived)
# wonderful!
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 3:33, archived)
# That's
spot on that is Barnesy , superb ! :)
(, Tue 22 Apr 2003, 8:33, archived)