![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
he's much more famous than lots of c-list celebs I can't remember, but get featured in More
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:36,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's just a bugger having to sift through the "fashion" pages.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:39,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i quite like their fashion pages, not that i've read it properly in a few years.
It's not as bad as the Times style magazine where i want everything but haven't the slightest hope of affording it.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:42,
archived)
It's not as bad as the Times style magazine where i want everything but haven't the slightest hope of affording it.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if I want to look at clothes, I go to a clothes shop.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:44,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
nice.
And shoes.
I could happily look at shoes all day long.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:48,
archived)
And shoes.
I could happily look at shoes all day long.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
about the wide variety of tastes and lifestyles on b3ta.
But you're weird!
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:50,
archived)
But you're weird!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Just because she insists on good grooming, doesn't make her weird. In fact, it makes her normal, SO BACK OFF! At least we both have won our war on FRUMP. Have you?
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:51,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
to make sure women are insecure about their appearance, otherwise they wouldn't pay for the weaves and handjobs
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:56,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Am I the only one who finds this idea a little strange?
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:00,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's when they have their nails done.
There was no need to take a smutty interpretation
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:03,
archived)
There was no need to take a smutty interpretation
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
as I would imagine 'handjob' has pretty much just the one definition :)
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:08,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
so I'll bow to your superior knowledge
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:10,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
anything about handjobs? Shirley not.
And I don't do long nails either - can't type properly with them let alone awful acrylic things.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:14,
archived)
And I don't do long nails either - can't type properly with them let alone awful acrylic things.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I've just never seen the point of looking at pictures of clothes and makeup.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:59,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Benefit makeup isn't nice to look at!
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:00,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
beautifooooooooool... I love that stuff.
And also Bloom stuff, 'cos it smells so nice and the lipgloss tastes like choccies.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:03,
archived)
And also Bloom stuff, 'cos it smells so nice and the lipgloss tastes like choccies.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Pout in Covent Garden is such a beautiful shop.
I spend a fortune on Benefit when they have 3for2 on in Boots..
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:05,
archived)
I spend a fortune on Benefit when they have 3for2 on in Boots..
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
when I need new makeup I go to Boots ot the Body Shop and buy more makeup. Looking at a picture of the stuff does nothing for me I'm afraid...
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:03,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is really really gorgeous though.
You do, however, pay for its gorgeousness.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:06,
archived)
You do, however, pay for its gorgeousness.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i'm glad to be in such good company.
I bet you have an ever larger selection of clown pendants than me?!
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:59,
archived)
I bet you have an ever larger selection of clown pendants than me?!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
no no.
Shopping and a like of shoes and clothes is a normal girl thing!
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:52,
archived)
Shopping and a like of shoes and clothes is a normal girl thing!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
are the essence of life.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 17:02,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
no idea More was still going.
Or that it was bought/read by anyone over the age of 15...
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:51,
archived)
Or that it was bought/read by anyone over the age of 15...
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I find it's a bugger having to sift through the rest of it to get to the fashion pages.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:46,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's hardly the ultimate in investigative journalism, but it provides a giggle. I guess I never grew out of laughing at the problem pages.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:48,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and don't remember the fashion bits being much good. I just do that with every magazine, pretty much - read the fashion, then the gossip, then get bored.
It's why I love Heat so much - it does all that, and it's funny. *prepares for onslaught of people who don't read it snarling about how crap it is*
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:51,
archived)
It's why I love Heat so much - it does all that, and it's funny. *prepares for onslaught of people who don't read it snarling about how crap it is*
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
actually I've never read it. Just fancied snarling ;-)
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:53,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'll never buy it again. It's fifth rate shite that even the tabloids won't touch.
something like that, you mean?
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:56,
archived)
something like that, you mean?
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and National Enquirer too for all those vital details about Jennifer/Ben/Cameron/Justin/Britney/whoever
Yeah, so you feel a little sullied having read them, but who cares?
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:57,
archived)
Yeah, so you feel a little sullied having read them, but who cares?
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Gets heat.
It's a spastic-mess of c-list photos.
Though the celebs caught with hairy pits/deoderant stains/gammy makeup does entertain.
It's sort of like real life photoshop.
( ,
Mon 29 Sep 2003, 16:58,
archived)
It's a spastic-mess of c-list photos.
Though the celebs caught with hairy pits/deoderant stains/gammy makeup does entertain.
It's sort of like real life photoshop.