b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 5228708 (Thread)

# I've got a job interview today!
I'll be wearing my nice black suit, a purple shirt, a purple, pink and grey stripey tie, blue cufflinks, nice shiny black shoes and my lucky thundercats pants!
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:14, archived)
# Thunderpants

Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

good luck.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:14, archived)
# cheers
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:15, archived)
# Hurrah!
Have some lucky Thundercats floor covering . . .



(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:16, archived)
# fanks dave
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:35, archived)
# why do the english think pants are underpants
despite the clue in the name UNDERpants?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:17, archived)
# Why do all the other cunts think they are so fucking clever?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:20, archived)
# because we don't resort to petty insults?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:23, archived)
# Why do people refer to British people as English?
It's insulting to the Scots, Welsh and N Irelandish people.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:28, archived)
# scots welsh and N. Ireland have their choice of roots
as they have their own language troots as well as english
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:29, archived)
# I'm not English
I am Scottish!
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:34, archived)
# that's why i try to avoid using UK if possible
it's like misunderstanding the whole ulster/Northern Ireland thing, altho I suspect many people forget about the 2 counties left! :)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:37, archived)
# Your reply to my post said
"why do the english" etc etc
insinuating that I was english
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:42, archived)
# my apologies
it was a question based on the assumption that someone posting here might know, but I didn't mean to imply you were. I couldn't say British as it assumes that all of the U.K. territories use it... complicated, huh? :)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:59, archived)
# are you a septic?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:21, archived)
# septic or anti-septic?
Not sure i follo wthough
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:23, archived)
# because we are english, and we invented the words.
so we KNOW what the words mean...

its just those others who change things...

like hood instead of bonnet....

or chips instead of crisps....

or....

(carry on ad infinitum........)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:21, archived)
# you are incorrect, sir.
One, you're assumign that american adendums to english words holdfor all english speakers. Pants has held it's original meaning in all english speaking communities, bar the UK.

Two, English is a modern language, and anglosaxon derivative, SAE, with letter sadded like DNA from all the cross-pollenation of invasions and counterinvasions to France. The French oocupation of parts off England added new letters to the anglosaxon form (Q, K), and much of the word forms in english are derivative from european words. Oddly, in Irish, many peoplassuming words ar eanglicised whn in fact the opposite holds; Carr, meaning 'Car' in the modern sense originally meant 'Cart', and english took the meaning on board along with many older celtic words, as the anglo saxon settlers took celtic land. The origins of enlgish are as much a give and take with surrounding language forms as anything, assuming primacy based on speaker-count is a fallacy
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:29, archived)
# I don't care
next.....
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:31, archived)
# hmmmmmm
10 Print statement
20 if Counterpoint /= WhatIWantToHear goto 10

:)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:34, archived)
# did you type all of that very quickly?
the spelling and grammar is awful!
confused would we?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:37, archived)
# yup
failing at multitasking bigtime

mean to edit, but you know, it's the web, on a messageboard, floating into some archived past. would you go back and fix it?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:40, archived)
# prolly
/anal
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:43, archived)
# "woooaaaahhhhh.....
look at the brain on myron"
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:43, archived)
# WTFAYBOA?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:47, archived)
# can you honestly say
that every word in the english language was "inventented" by the english?

It's a wildly simplistic and inaccurate understanding of language. Most languages are just rarified amalgamations of the languages that surround and precede them. It would be arrogant to think otherwise - a cultural imperialism.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:52, archived)
# The
English didn't invent all the words they use, no-one's claiming that, but all of the influences you're talking about come from before the language was taken to America, rendering that huge post a bit pointless really.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 13:10, archived)
# why does everyone assume I mean america?
English was transported to other countries too! convicts and settlers in australia, empire building in india, and children speaking english in irish schools under english rule were beaten - it took hold all over
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 13:17, archived)
# meh.
like, whatever dude.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:50, archived)
# yup
but i liek to argue! :)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:53, archived)
# because pants is too abiguous.
trousers
underpants

are not.
Get off my hat!
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:21, archived)
# what about pance and y-fronts?
that could be confusing
hello, Dave the Hat ;)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:23, archived)
# y-not-fronts
if you wear em backwards
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:30, archived)
# brown bird in the ring
tra lala la la
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:26, archived)
# 'Pants' is an abbreviation of 'underpants'.
'tis acceptable considering most UK folks say 'trousers'.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:29, archived)
# oh
it's an abbreviation. that makes more sense

ta, best answer
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:31, archived)
# Erm...
doesn't the Elizabethan English term "Pantaloons" come into it somewhere?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:40, archived)
# eeenteresting
You're right! According to dictionary.com, one root is

[Short for pantaloon.]
Word History: One would not expect a word for a modern article of clothing to come ultimately from the name of a 4th-century Roman Catholic saint, but that is the case with the word pants. It can be traced back to Pantaleon, the patron saint of Venice. He became so closely associated with the inhabitants of that city that the Venetians were popularly known as Pantaloni. Consequently, among the commedia dell'arte's stock characters the representative Venetian (a stereotypically wealthy but miserly merchant) was called Pantalone, or Pantalon in French. In the mid-17th century the French came to identify him with one particular style of trousers, a style which became known as pantaloons in English. Pantaloons was later applied to another style that came into fashion in the late 18th century, tight-fitting garments that had begun to replace knee breeches. After that pantaloons was used to refer to trousers in general. The abbreviation of pantaloons to pants met with some resistance at first; it was considered vulgar and, as Oliver Wendell Holmes put it, “a word not made for gentlemen, but ‘gents.’” First found in the writings of Edgar Allan Poe in 1840, pants has replaced the “gentleman's word” in English and has lost all obvious connection to Saint Pantaleon.

So it varies from the rest of the english speaking countries perhaps in adoptation of a different style.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:43, archived)
# abbreviation
Pfffft.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:49, archived)
#
Me, make something up, just because it seemed like a good idea? Nevaaaarrrr!

edit: I wasn't explaining the origin of the word 'pants', just wht some folks say 'pants instead of underpants'...
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:53, archived)
# Ooh lucky underpants
May we have a picture of you wearing those?
.
.
.
.
.
.
pretty please?
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:24, archived)
# em...no









pervert
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:29, archived)
# Fantastic!
Lucky pants are teh bestest. I got a pair of these for my last birthday - Trevor rocks :o)

Good luck with the job interview :o)
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:31, archived)
# ta
(, Mon 17 Oct 2005, 12:35, archived)