b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7456320 (Thread)

# cheeky pearoast

(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:17, archived)
# very lovely
you filthy hamtoucher
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:18, archived)
# this
But with more grunting and groaning.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:19, archived)
# ***wOw***
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:18, archived)
# such a shit film.
also 230k for a woo yay?
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:19, archived)
# the comic style editing was nice.
And it was good to see Lou Ferigno.

(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:20, archived)
# yeah but ed norton as the new banner!!
WOO!
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:22, archived)
# That's his career over then.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:24, archived)
# Over...?
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:26, archived)
# and out.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:28, archived)
# He's a lifter of gentlemen's shirts
Flaming poofter
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:31, archived)
# Good in parts.
And yes, yes it is.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:20, archived)
# Agreed the Hulk was shit, as was Transformers!
Corkingly good anim MrRee.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:21, archived)
# What was wrong with Transformers?
I saw it yesterday and loved it. And I hate the original cartoons or comics or series of advertisements for toys or whatever the fuck it was.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:22, archived)
# the 2D human characters
the awful shoe horning of the story
the lack of any real action
the horrible way they transform
and the entire missed opportunity of it all

here's hoping it's like the X-men films
and the second one will be better


(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:26, archived)
# But the terrible stereotypes of human characters was hilarious
as was the naff story. Especially the hacking. THIS IS THE SIGNAL THEY WERE USING TO HACK! ONLY A FAT BLACK DUDE WHO PLAYS DDR ALL DAY CAN FIND THE SECRET MESSAGE HIDDEN IN THE HACKER SIGNAL! WHAT THE FUCK THEY HACKED OUR FIREWALL THAT SHOULD TAKE TWENTY YEARS?!

What was wrong with the transforming, anyway? It had the "Borkbirkbirkbork" noise, and Starscream and Megatron could do awesome flips and transform in a split second while in mid air
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:27, archived)
# hahaha I loved the australian girl, just because she had nothing to do with the film whatsoever they just said
"WE NEED SEXY PEOPLE IN THIS SCENE!"
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:29, archived)
# :D
I'd forgotten her until now.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:31, archived)
# "I'm an australian! LAWL, HEAR MY CRAZY ACCENT LAWWL! AWLSO I HAWVE TIWTS!"
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:32, archived)
# "Our webs are down, sir!" "Which webs?" "All of them!"
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:32, archived)
# Hah, exactly :D
I don't know which was worse. Die Hard 4's "QUICK HACK THE GASPIPES AND REROUTE ALL THE GAS TO THE PLANT TO MAKE IT EXPLODE!", or the Transformer signal hacking with secret messages and elite black DDR dudes
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:33, archived)
# or the whole, map on your glasses thing
WTF!?!?

why?!?!
i'll tell you why
because we need it for the story and we can't be bothered
to try and come up with something cool....
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:35, archived)
# :D
But without the glasses they wouldn't have been able to include the completely unnecessary glasses finding scenes with the transformers hiding outside the house, the "WERE YOU MASTURBATING!?!?" shouts of the mother and the "OMFG URFQUAKE!!" dad
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:39, archived)
# you're not doing very well in convincing me that this film was any good
:D
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:42, archived)
# Haha :D
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:43, archived)
# in those car adverts you can see how the car becomes a robot
in the film, the car becomes a mess then becomes a robot

things rotate over each other and it's all too complicated
i thought it was craptastic
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:32, archived)
# And yet still Manwife, Transforners obsessive that he is wants to see it.
He had to buy the frigging magazine to get the free dogtags, and then they wouldn't fit over his dreads.

Needless to say I wasn't as upset by this as he was.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:36, archived)
# I had this discussion with a friend yesterday (about what was wrong with the transforming)
and we decided it would be far more awesome if they all took two or three hours to transform.

AUTOBOTS, TRANSFORM!

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNKSHH! (step 1 of 79)

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNKSHHH! (step 2 of 79)

Three hours later:

NNNNNNNNNNNKSHHHH! (Step 73 of 79)
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:36, archived)
# Hah
But then in the next scene they do an instant flip transformation and jet into the air, because it's cool to do that. Screw consistency.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:41, archived)
# I thought the last half hour of Transformers was..what's the word...very good.
It's just the script and acting of THE HUMANS, that let it down.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:22, archived)
# the whole of the film was LOLROBOTS
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:24, archived)
# I LOVE robots, Miiiiiiiiiiiiister Scientist.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# Except it wasn't, really.
Because there was nowhere near enough robot stomping and far too much "HAY GUYS I'M A STEREOTYPICAL AMERICAN NERDY GUY WHO THINKS BUYING A CAR WILL GET ME ALL THE LAYDEEZ

...also EBAY."
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:26, archived)
# *makes transformer noise*
Bonecrusher was dispensed with far too easily
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:27, archived)
# Agreed, there are some awful scenes.
Like outside the kids house. It makes me angry just thinking about it!
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:28, archived)
# Haha
I loved that because it was so stupid, though. Especially how the transformers were fucking STOMPING AROUND and going "HEY SHUT UP GUYS" in their booming voices, and STILL no one could hear them.

I'm a fan of the craptastic :D
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:29, archived)
# same here.
it was cheesy and rubbish.

i loved it :D
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:32, archived)
# Yep :D
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:37, archived)
# didn't you want it to be cool and mindblowing?
i would have preferred it so
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:45, archived)
# Well I hear there are going to be two more movies with bigger budgets.
So maybe they'll be more mindblowing.

Either way is fine for me. I like awesome cool mindblowingless, but I also love the lulz of craptasticness
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:50, archived)
# well then hopefully it really will be like X-men
and the first installment was just to test the water
and the second will deliver on the coolness
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:52, archived)
# it was never, ever going to be that.
edit: but it would have been nice. :)
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:00, archived)
# The end was good, nothing like big fucking robots destroying stuff,
but I though the rest of the film was a let down. I was feeling like walking out after 2 hours.
It was a nice idea but it could have been executed better. I hate it when the story is changed too much like this was.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# I actually thoroughly enjoyed it from start to finish.
I was never bored.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:26, archived)
# Damn you Michael Bay.
Yessum, mostly shit. Except the big fighty scenes.

I downloaded it.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:27, archived)
# nothing like big robots destroying stuff in your face so much you can't actually see jack shit
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:28, archived)
# I've only seen the first hour
which is rubbish so far.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# I really liked the hulk comics.
Mainly because most of them were actually set in his brain, and he was unwittingly battling with his own psyche.

The movie did not take this path, which was unfortunate.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:21, archived)
# it was an hour and a half of incredibly ill thought out dialogue
climaxing with the least exciting action sequences ever

LOL HE'S BIG AND CAN JUMP CONTINENTS IN A SINGLE LEAP.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:22, archived)
# See, I always saw this kind of thing as just a horrible dream inside his head.
but NO, HE CAN ACTUALLY DO IT, IT'S A BETTER MOVIE THIS WAY.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# those bits needed comedy sound effects
BOIIIIIIIINGGGG!
BOOOIIIIINNNNNGGG!
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:27, archived)
# you might be onto something
I'd have probably enjoyed it just for those sequences alone
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:30, archived)
# You only just posted that
about an hour or so ago!
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:21, archived)
# ^this
It's not the end of the world!!11!one!111, but still...
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:22, archived)
# 3 and a half, ashurly!!11!1!!
fair cop - I didn't have time to thumb nail it earlier and it was before 10am. Only scumbags and peadophiles use the board before 10!
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:24, archived)
# *hands self in*
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# if this was with a black background i'd allow it
but it's too soon for a pearoast in it's own thread.

think of the kittens i'm now forced to behead because of this.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:25, archived)
# is there a time limit?
how many hours exactly?
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:26, archived)
# eleventy
twelvety on tuesdays
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:29, archived)
# it's all to do with how relevant it is
if someone had posted a picture of silver surfer and then you posted that or a link to your original post earlier as a reply, then that would be fine, but to post a new thread with it when you only posted a hour or two ago is frowned upon and usually ends in a frantic bumming without lube.

/adviceblog
(, Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:31, archived)