
If it got told to go fuck itself!
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:56,
archived)

In other news - I got a reply from Zoo after they asked if they could print one of my pics and I asked for a prize in return:
"Sorry, unfortunately we do not pay fees for reproduction of "You've got spam!" images and we have stopped awarding prizes for the best pic.
If you would still like your picture published and full credit, please reply to confirm that you are the originator of the work and let us know who to credit it to."
Needless to say I fucked them off :D
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:58,
archived)
"Sorry, unfortunately we do not pay fees for reproduction of "You've got spam!" images and we have stopped awarding prizes for the best pic.
If you would still like your picture published and full credit, please reply to confirm that you are the originator of the work and let us know who to credit it to."
Needless to say I fucked them off :D

Wasn't it THEM that wanted to publish it?
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:01,
archived)

And the cruel irony is that the image they wanted to use:

Didn't get a single reply and simply not as funny as:

Which got loads but they didn't like!
Oh well - Board: 1 - Emap Publications: 0
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:05,
archived)

Didn't get a single reply and simply not as funny as:

Which got loads but they didn't like!
Oh well - Board: 1 - Emap Publications: 0

that things aren't going so well in the land of emap lads mags. it would appear the lads would rather get their kicks on the interweb.
shame.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:02,
archived)
shame.

as an outside marketing contractor. Wankers to a man.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:15,
archived)

They've decided to simply be blatant as hell in ripping off whatever they feel like printing? And making only a passing effort at contacting the work's creator to offer 'full credit'? Hahahahaha!!! FP this!!
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 14:02,
archived)

i'd never leave the house.
( ,
Mon 30 Jul 2007, 13:58,
archived)