bugger the wikki one, do another with all the in jokes and other stuff they don't like and add it to the faq's or somewhere similar.
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:27,
archived)
'Now, don't get us wrong: Jefferey O. Gustafson, the Administrator with the blank user page, is a bit of a dick. He picks fights like a drunk construction worker at a bar, he does wholesale moves of articles and other actions that yank the crank of users, and shows all the excellent signs of being a mini-dictator within his chosen space.'
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:34,
archived)
and I'd already gleaned this information from reading his notes in response to his raping of the b3ta page.
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:37,
archived)
which I dunno - maybe I do or don't deserve an entry - but there's policies for deletion - these things are meant to be discussed, and a consensus found. Not just one guy with a grudge.
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:39,
archived)
wiki is not for petty personal issues, then he's used his admin status to inflict his own petty personal issues.
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 19:01,
archived)
net fascists always are. there is no way that the wikipedia page currently standing, as edited by this Gustafson pillock, is sufficient to describe b3ta.
I'm sure all his /b/ and chan mates are wanking over it.
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:30,
archived)
I'm sure all his /b/ and chan mates are wanking over it.
Last year we managed to get our colleged blocked from editing for a month, which I was pretty proud with :P
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:32,
archived)
ALL educational institute IPs last year
couldn't alter anything from my old halls :(
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 17:11,
archived)
couldn't alter anything from my old halls :(
goes off to vandalise wikipedia as he is an admin....
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:30,
archived)
That's a bit harsh of him...bit of an abuse of power me thinks
"...to a website of questionable notability whose membership have specifically targeted Wikipedia for hard-to-find vandalism..."
I mean really ! what the hell ?
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 16:30,
archived)
"...to a website of questionable notability whose membership have specifically targeted Wikipedia for hard-to-find vandalism..."
I mean really ! what the hell ?
to be fair, that is, uh, true...
At least two newsletter items advocating that, im pretty sure.
Questionable notability is a load of cock though. Here's me thinking an index of everything ought not to make such distinctions
(,
Wed 24 Oct 2007, 19:43,
archived)
At least two newsletter items advocating that, im pretty sure.
Questionable notability is a load of cock though. Here's me thinking an index of everything ought not to make such distinctions
