She is doing a great job though
I love the home office and everything that they do and it's because she's so good at her job.
THE HOME OFFICE FUCKING RULES MAN!!! IF THEY RELEASED AN ALBUM I WOULD BUY IT ON CASSETTE!
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:36,
archived)
THE HOME OFFICE FUCKING RULES MAN!!! IF THEY RELEASED AN ALBUM I WOULD BUY IT ON CASSETTE!
I have a whole load of Home Office stuff on CD
/secret agent blog
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:38,
archived)
I'm a wee bit ill
but okidoki. I was off on holiday last week- just home.
Awww.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:49,
archived)
Awww.
*hugs and magic rubs all better*
I hope your holiday was awesome-o
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:53,
archived)
some real munter
was talking about this on BBC this morning. She was saying how awful it was that JS's husband had done this.
As if her husband would ever do such a thing! I reckon even her dildo would imagine she was someone else
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:36,
archived)
As if her husband would ever do such a thing! I reckon even her dildo would imagine she was someone else
I have a theory...
That the porn was delibrately added to expenses as it makes a better story, and diverts attention from the fact that she was claiming her pay TV on expenses.
What she was watching is irrelevant.
AND ANOTHER THING
If they were getting Oceans 13 on pay-per-view that must have been over a year ago... so why's it only come out now (oo-er!)
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:40,
archived)
What she was watching is irrelevant.
AND ANOTHER THING
If they were getting Oceans 13 on pay-per-view that must have been over a year ago... so why's it only come out now (oo-er!)
ha ha
person in "has bought porn" shocker
... they probably watched it together and then tried to recreate it... it's a beautiful thing and Jacqui has nothing to be ashamed of... she's a very sensual woman
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:40,
archived)
... they probably watched it together and then tried to recreate it... it's a beautiful thing and Jacqui has nothing to be ashamed of... she's a very sensual woman
Oooh...
the thought of Jacqui Smith calling me a slag
*spluffs*
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:47,
archived)
*spluffs*
I refuse to have my attention diverted from how shit she is
by how horny her husband is.
I'd be fucking horny and frustrated if my cock socket looked like that. That or mid-divorce due to cheating.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:38,
archived)
I'd be fucking horny and frustrated if my cock socket looked like that. That or mid-divorce due to cheating.
I'd rather that than Blears
I bet hers is like two bricks stuck together
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:39,
archived)
or like an old chamois leather you find in a bucket in the garage that you forgot to wring out after using it last summer
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:41,
archived)
*round of applause*
I'll leave my fish skin analogy out of this, I think. Save it for later.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:43,
archived)
that is a really nasty image... I may well be seeing my lunch again...
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:43,
archived)
And the award for 'Alliteration in a sexual context' goes to CAPAIN WOW for 'cock socket'!
how's the new job going Wowser?
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:40,
archived)
It's not, yet
I thought it would be, but here I am doing the same old sheyite. You?
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:41,
archived)
meh!
I'm just getting back into things after relaxing a little round about October. Deadlines schmedlines
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:44,
archived)
I want a new job. I don't want this new one.
It's not different enough. Ugh.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:46,
archived)
probably assonance rather than alliteration
but who cares... 'cock socket' is a fitting phrase for a fanny!
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:51,
archived)
Once again
the daily mailers are up in arms with faux indignation.
Think on this. Virgin bills are pretty much lumped together for all services now to keep costs down.
I doubt whatever unpaid 'researcher' that is being used as a secretary gave a moments consideration when submitting bills for expenses.
If her husband had decided to get a Batman film from box office instead of 'old sluts 3' then nobody would have been any the wiser and the expenses would have been paid, no doubt as the were every month previous for her and every other MP using the same services.
The guy had a five knuckle shuffle over some crap porn. Big deal.
Somebody tried to get as much as they could from an expense claim? Big deal also.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:50,
archived)
Think on this. Virgin bills are pretty much lumped together for all services now to keep costs down.
I doubt whatever unpaid 'researcher' that is being used as a secretary gave a moments consideration when submitting bills for expenses.
If her husband had decided to get a Batman film from box office instead of 'old sluts 3' then nobody would have been any the wiser and the expenses would have been paid, no doubt as the were every month previous for her and every other MP using the same services.
The guy had a five knuckle shuffle over some crap porn. Big deal.
Somebody tried to get as much as they could from an expense claim? Big deal also.
um...
"I doubt whatever unpaid 'researcher' that is being used as a secretary gave a moments consideration when submitting bills for expenses."
That'll be her husband who is paid £40,000 a year out of expenses to check these kind of things...
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:53,
archived)
That'll be her husband who is paid £40,000 a year out of expenses to check these kind of things...
Oh please.
We all know how to use and abuse interns to do the jobs we are supposed to be doing.
Euro MP's will be claiming £1M in expenses next year before salary and people get upset over a £5 wankfest? It's hypocritical. Everyone tries to get as much as they can for as little effort. It's human nature.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 13:58,
archived)
Euro MP's will be claiming £1M in expenses next year before salary and people get upset over a £5 wankfest? It's hypocritical. Everyone tries to get as much as they can for as little effort. It's human nature.
The fact it was porn is irrelevant
The public is narked because it's come off the back of her housing allowance claim that is currently being investigated, and she's the fucking home secretary.
She is is one of the main people responsuible for telling people how to live their lives.
It's classic "do as I say, not as I do" and the public are sick to death of being preached to about morality by people who have all the morality of a criminal.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 14:16,
archived)
She is is one of the main people responsuible for telling people how to live their lives.
It's classic "do as I say, not as I do" and the public are sick to death of being preached to about morality by people who have all the morality of a criminal.
I don't have an issue with it really.
I think it's pretty much the same as VAT returns. I claim absolutely everything I possibly can including her hair and makeup against business expenses and some of it is accepted and some not. Nobody bats an eye that I claim for some things that will never be accepted ( although my accountant and I often have a wry smile at each other as if to say " I can't believe we just put THAT on there" )
Expenses should be the same. Claim for everything you can and then somebody decides what's in and what's out. That's how it works when I get expense claims in during jobs.
The uproar should not be about who claimed it, but whoever passed it if indeed, they did.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 14:28,
archived)
Expenses should be the same. Claim for everything you can and then somebody decides what's in and what's out. That's how it works when I get expense claims in during jobs.
The uproar should not be about who claimed it, but whoever passed it if indeed, they did.
I'm not a Daily Mailer
but I would like to know how that Virgin Media can be classed as a Palimentary Expense, regardless of whether it was used to watch Corrie or Big Jugs TV. Telephone and internet I can understand but TV? She earns enough - why can't she pay for it herself?
and the big deal is that the money to pay for these services and expenses doesn't come from a company's profit margin - it comes from taxation of Joe Public. If somebody working for a PLC was taking the piss with their expense claims they'd be fired.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 14:00,
archived)
and the big deal is that the money to pay for these services and expenses doesn't come from a company's profit margin - it comes from taxation of Joe Public. If somebody working for a PLC was taking the piss with their expense claims they'd be fired.
The claim was for internet.
but as I said. Virginmedia are lumping the billing for all services together.
Even so any MP will be claiming TV expenses as a legitimate expense. I'd be quite annoyed if MPs were not using all available media to keep abreast of world events.
My point is that expense fiddling is rife. It's never been any different in parliament ( regardless of party affiliation. Joe Public paid for the conservative's whores in the early 80s ) and being angry today because something made the news is pointless if you were not angry about it when it wasn't in the news.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 14:07,
archived)
Even so any MP will be claiming TV expenses as a legitimate expense. I'd be quite annoyed if MPs were not using all available media to keep abreast of world events.
My point is that expense fiddling is rife. It's never been any different in parliament ( regardless of party affiliation. Joe Public paid for the conservative's whores in the early 80s ) and being angry today because something made the news is pointless if you were not angry about it when it wasn't in the news.
I agree with you - fiddling expenses is rife
but when the said expenses comes from general taxation you can understand why people would be upset, regardless of whichever bunch if inept tossers are in charge at the time. We're in recession; people are losing their jobs left right and centre so people will be upset about the whole affair.
I dare say the Tories put in some mad claims back when they were in charge (I seem to remember a Tory MP putting wallpaper costing £5000 a roll on his expenses back in the early 90s)
All MP expenses need to be audited every year and any irregularity investigated by an independant body.
( ,
Mon 30 Mar 2009, 14:18,
archived)
I dare say the Tories put in some mad claims back when they were in charge (I seem to remember a Tory MP putting wallpaper costing £5000 a roll on his expenses back in the early 90s)
All MP expenses need to be audited every year and any irregularity investigated by an independant body.