![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 11:58,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'll use program for computers but it's sodding programme!
rob ya seppo! sorrrreeett geeezzzah!
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 14:37,
archived)
rob ya seppo! sorrrreeett geeezzzah!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but the cfb doesn't work, 500 error
I thought Bath died on Thursday in L.A. of a heart attack?
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 11:59,
archived)
I thought Bath died on Thursday in L.A. of a heart attack?
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
that's a nice use of technology- how do you avoid blurring at such hi res?
*checks every window for nudey ladies- surely probability is on my side*
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:05,
archived)
*checks every window for nudey ladies- surely probability is on my side*
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is about the gist of it. Think this one was about 200 photos
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:10,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I remember the first gigapixels thingy a couple of years ago of the Delft tech uni area. There was commotion about license plates being readble, or a crime happening or something, I can't remember exactly
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and tutorials
Autostitch is good for free, autopano pro paid but better
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:13,
archived)
Autostitch is good for free, autopano pro paid but better
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I use autostitch all the time, I'm just not sure how you took the pics. Are they a lot of pictures taken with a zoom lens?
And how did you get the nice zooming thingy? Is that the website that hosts it?
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:18,
archived)
And how did you get the nice zooming thingy? Is that the website that hosts it?
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
pictures are taken from a hill on a tripod with a superzoom camera (a.k.a bridge, prosumer ...), cameras which can zoom in alot. I usually use a kodak z8612 (12x optical zoom) but for this one i borrowed a fuji finepix s8000 (18x optical)
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:21,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
No use trying this with a resonably good 300m lens then, I guess. Cheers.
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:38,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
300mm and 12MP i guess would be about as good as an 8MP and 450mm equiv. Also this was a fairly narrow field of view, if you can find a vantage point that fills more of the view, you can go bigger just by going wider/taller. another recent image crept over a gigapixel at only 150mm equiv just because it went the whole 360 degrees
and even if you dont manage a gigapixel, a few hundred megapixels is still enough to make a pretty impressive picture
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:44,
archived)
and even if you dont manage a gigapixel, a few hundred megapixels is still enough to make a pretty impressive picture
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
when I can think of a subject with a nice vantage point
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:59,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is on gigapan, a site for people to share large images, the viewer is embedable, hence is embeded on my site.
some images are hosted in my own webspace with the zoomify viewer (zoomify.com i think)
( ,
Sun 28 Jun 2009, 12:26,
archived)
some images are hosted in my own webspace with the zoomify viewer (zoomify.com i think)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
gigapan? Sounds like indutrial sized spanging imminent ;)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
/edit: apparently, it was as early as 2004 that they made it, and it was 2.5 GP.
No mention of any anomalies here though
www.fredshouse.net/archive/000299.html