![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Your picture's shit, and so are you.
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:00,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
has led me to express my rather forthright views on whether my image has been sized correctly or not.
Oh & it is only 175k.
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:03,
archived)
Oh & it is only 175k.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm paying for extra baggage to get on the plane.
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:07,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If they all stick to the FAQ, that is a maximum of about 5 and a half meg to download.
If however they were all 175K like yours is, that would be nearly 10 meg to download.
That's why there's a filesize in the FAQ, not to persecute individual images, but to keep the board ticking over smoothly.
Otherwise it would all grind to shit.
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:13,
archived)
If however they were all 175K like yours is, that would be nearly 10 meg to download.
That's why there's a filesize in the FAQ, not to persecute individual images, but to keep the board ticking over smoothly.
Otherwise it would all grind to shit.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
People on capped bandwidth could have seen 2 more lolcock images, you insensitive bastard!
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:05,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
before you can be gittish and antsy at me....or summat.
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:06,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is it that hard to scale optimise in ps?
it's about 4 clicks in gimp...
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:08,
archived)
it's about 4 clicks in gimp...
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
clever thinking I say!
( ,
Tue 7 Jul 2009, 10:06,
archived)