Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:12, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
I never understood that one.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:14, Reply)
I don't understand it either, but 5 and a half lb in a fortnight will do nicely for now!
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:17, Reply)
At that rate you'll be a size zero by the time dj agrees to a wedding date.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:20, Reply)
Or rather, it works more or less because you can't be bothered to eat too much of one type of thing on one day to actually put on weight. In terms of health or "science" it's bollocks, there's no basis to it, and like Atkins is almost certainly long term harmful.
But hey, anything to cater for those that want to put their fingers in their ears when people explain that the only way to lose weight healthily is to eat less and exercise more.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:19, Reply)
it's worked for me, and the mrs.
From what I learned of Weight Watchers it also promotes the sensible way of doing it, which is why I didn't give my mrs a shoeing when she joined.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:24, Reply)
There is something up here called Scottish Slimmers which some of my friends swear by, which is similar. Anything which suggests you should eat certain food groups, or colours, or anything like that, is almost certainly arsewater, but of course they (Atkins, Cambridge, that new French one, etc etc) play on the "oh but look you can eat shit loads and nice things too and it'll be EASY" .. people want something for nothing, and you can't have it with this. Not without serious aftereffects.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:29, Reply)
just by getting people to think about what they eat
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:31, Reply)
but it is much better, more enjoyable and long-lasting if the behaviour it creates involves eating and exercising healthily rather than a weird combination of foods, or replacing meals with a bar or shake.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:33, Reply)
It's not much different to WW except you can eat bigger portions. And it works and I'm not unhealthy.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:36, Reply)
but dysentery would make you lose weight. What they are is both incredibly unhealthy and mostly unsustainable, because most people that use them are looking for an easy fix for something that requires work and willpower.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:35, Reply)
I've laid off the wine and chese, I'm on the exercise bike.
I just can't do that 'points' thing or weigh my portions.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:37, Reply)
In my defence, you did say up there you were "separating food groups"
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:52, Reply)
Just more exercise and less food. It's the only thing that will work long time.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:33, Reply)
Would have been nice to lose it quicker but I just can't do faddy diets.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:40, Reply)
I just judge by how my clothes fit.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:47, Reply)
and as I mentioned earlier, have not actually lost any significant weight, despite getting noticably thinner...
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:53, Reply)
I have noticed that I'm losing weight, so it's making it feel worthwhile.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:54, Reply)
I suppose I must have
or it could be all that gold that I've been swallowing for safe keeping...
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:56, Reply)
And of course I have loads of veg and becuase I'm eating less junk I'm more nourished so i'm maybe not eating as much, but I've gpt a big appetite.
And you also have to make sure that you get fibre and calcium and a healthy amount of whichever one you're not eating.
I also exercise. I haven't bought anything, but it's the one 'diet' I've found that doesn't pour scorn on carbs and also keeps me healthy, while helping curb my bad habits.
In theory, they just say you can eat tons of something, because like you say, they know you can't.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:34, Reply)
without "separating" food groups, just by stopping and thinking about what you are eating. separating food groups, without becoming immensely dull, is a bad idea, because you require certain things from meat to help absorb certain things from vegetables and so on. You're trying to short-term "trick" your body like the early stages of Atkins, essentially, and it ain't good for you.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:39, Reply)
Be it meat or the vegetarian equivalent. I do it the way I do it because I ain't fussed on meat so will happily have Quorn or not.
i wouldn't advise anyone to spend money on it, but the few tips I've picked up have worked for me and several of my family members. It's about removing those tiny but over time, dangerous things that you have too much of without thinking. it honestly is a healthy balanced diet, i just do it in my own fucked up way.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:42, Reply)
I thought you were talking about separating food groups?
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:44, Reply)
I think it developed from that separating/food-combinging thing, but it doesn't make you deny any kind. On a carb day you have as many of those as you like, but have only a healthy measured portion of meat/protein and vice-versa. And yes, it's probably a 'trick' but you can do it long term because you ARE still getting the required amounts of the necessary food groups.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:51, Reply)
my mrs wants to lose more weight before the wedding. I keep subtly trying to hint to her that we should eat a load less pasta and things like that, but it's not working. I may to come right out and say it.
Another problem is that we eat with friends a lot, which is generally at least two courses of fucking lovely fattening food.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:15, Reply)
and lost three and a bit stone by my wedding in August. Since then I've kept the weight off, apart from the fun time I had over xmas.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:18, Reply)
so long as you have low fat sauce and little or no meat on your pasta pig-out day.
It works and I have no idea why.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:18, Reply)
therefore you don't get all the calories. This, and I can't stress this enough - is not a good thing medically.
Plus, how much pasta can you actually eat without a decent sauce? Not that much before you get bored with it.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:21, Reply)
or, I assume, tomatoes. or any highly calorific vegetables?
I'm not trying to suggest that it won't work. Just that there is a health-related long term price to pay for these diets.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:41, Reply)
It doesn't count calories. Fruit and veg are all good.
my sauces are mostly loads of tomato and passata anyway so it's been no great sacrifice.
So if you're a big carnivore, you'd have more meat, and an 'allowed' amount of pasta (still plenty) and if you're a big carb head like me, you'd have a bit of meat in the sauce, enough to meet the daily requirements.
Don't assume then go on a rant. Tomatoes are allowed so nur.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:45, Reply)
as bought-in sauces etc are packed with salt and sugar that you can't see. When you make it yourself, it's largely free fo those.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:46, Reply)
I was following up on what you said about "not eating two types of thing in the same meal" thing. Obviously I've misunderstood, but pasta and a tomato and meat sauce is protein, carb, sugar, fibre all in one.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:49, Reply)
And I mean, not big equal amounts rather than NONE in the same meal.
Oh Gordon Bennett, I'm not a rep for Slimming World anyway, but doing their thing has helped me, and improved my skin to boot.
I'm tired now, because I'm malnourished, we'll have to hang up our gloves.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:56, Reply)
things are somewhat clearer though with your latest explanations.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:57, Reply)
But I didn't realise I was getting an exam on it!
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 14:59, Reply)
and fair enough, yours does sound reasonable. I just don't like the way that "nutritionists" get away with peddling harmful shit as diets.
(, Wed 26 Jan 2011, 15:00, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread