Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
ones in which you frequently partake yourself, but you object to others being legalised, despite the fact that abuse of alcohol is generally much more damaging physically than abuse of anything else? And that rehabilitation programmes such as treatment with methadone have been shown to be ineffective in a large percentage of cases?
Legalise them, tax them and above all educate people about them. Even if it was legal and of high quality I'd still have zero desire to try heroin/crack etc because I'm aware of the inherent risks.
Also, why have you been banned for buying meds which you have a prescription for...?
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:15, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Different drugs are different, a sollution to one is not nesserarly a sollution to another. However, you can regulate that, you can say no to "Drug A" and yes to "Drug B".... BUT, different people are different too, but you can't regulate that, you can't say yes to "Person A" without saying yes to "Person B".
Maybe, possibly, just as an idea, you could have a whole new specification of job, something that doesn't exist currently, that gives you permmision/access to gain a cirtain drug. Like a cross between a bar-tender, doctor, counciler and phamacist. WIth technology, you can make sure that someone has to be registered for them. This way, the person can say to them, "Look, I got a crack habbit, I take 3 rocks a day, I'm going to get these anyway so I might as well get them from you where they're safe.... Ok, here is 20 rocks for this week, 19 for the next...and so on" or someone can say "I'm going on a night out, I want an E.... ok, now I know it does this to me, I still want it, but only once this month".
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:23, Reply)
But he's actually well known in the area of being a cock, from when I used to work in the cab firm.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:28, Reply)
it's knowing what it might do to me, am I wrong to think others are the same? I suppose easier availability might get a few more users, but people actually knowing what they were taking would have to mean a few less deaths...
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:30, Reply)
I mean, there's a reason people are addicted, right: it must feel fucking awesome. But I just don't trust myself to try it, knowing what it can do.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:32, Reply)
If I am ever old, rich end lacking in relatives who care enough, it's the addiction that scares me most as I know I have an addictive personality.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:35, Reply)
If you could take it, and then later on take something that'll instantlly get rid of any phsyical or phsycological addiction.... then I'd love to try it.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:40, Reply)
I don't want to take ecstasy because you feel worse the next day. I rarely get hangovers so I drink way more than I should and should really cut back but its enjoyable so I do it.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:42, Reply)
I mean, it was alright, and it was free, but it surely as fucking hell was not worth feeling like Satan's sludgy arse-scrapings for the following 48 hours.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:53, Reply)
X is still my drug of choice, mainly because I can't afford coke on a regular basis and am generally unfussed about experimenting with new substances nowadays.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 15:00, Reply)
I've never tried to source it again for fear I might find it incredible easy to get hold of and develop a Problem.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 15:51, Reply)
that shooting up is like a flock of sparrows flying up your arse backwards.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:40, Reply)
but pertaining to orgasms. If memory recalls, it was along the lines of 'somethin' gann'ed up ma back like a flicht o' swallies and I met the blessed angels'
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:44, Reply)
This kind of drug-dealer as I mentioned above would be able to limit down the amount of drug taken to help people get off it, or people who insist on having it to have it safely within the realms of limitation. Nobody, I think, takes it for the first time in their right mind, most people who I know who have taken it claim they were drugged or douped into taking it on their first go. So if you had never taken the stuff and did went to this kind of dealer, they could say "Why are you taking it? OK, you want effects ABC.... try this instead".
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:38, Reply)
The people I know who've done drugs have chosen to do them for pleasure, and the two I've ever tried (weed & speed) I did out of curiosity, one I liked, one I didn't and never did again.
Tobacco is the only thing I started on by accident, I got hooked from smoking it in joints and it took a very long time to get clear of the addiction, if indeed I have.
Oh, and if we're including legal drugs, alcohol was choice and non addictive, I'd less soon give up chocolate or cheese.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:43, Reply)
Because I do know people that when they have been at their lowest may very well have smoked crack if it had been available in the shops but instead went to the Doctors and got sorted.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:39, Reply)
there would/could never, ever be a system where you could just nip in to Boots and get a dose of crystal meth or whatever. That would be horribly wrong.
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:42, Reply)
but you couldn't just wander in and buy them; as Gonz says, you'd have to have some kind of assessment first. You couldn't have a system where some 21 yr old office flunky who's had a bad day thinks 'a glass of wine just won't cut it this evening: tonight I'm going to try smack instead.'
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 14:45, Reply)
(, Thu 7 Jul 2011, 15:03, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread