Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Alt: Christians, Manchester, the Tate Modern, the enduring popularity of Harry Hill, science
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:49, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
China is famous for it's pottery skillz.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:55, Reply)
for making 10 million seeds out of clay. It is art with a silent F
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:57, Reply)
but I'm pretty sure that if I asked to suspend an AK-47 wrapped in a doily from the ceiling by a pair of green tights I'd be told to get to fuck, and rightly so.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:09, Reply)
but I suspect that's because almost no thought whatsoever has gone into the work.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:17, Reply)
in which he has literally gone to town on each with a red brush. Apparently it signifies rage and ecstasy. I would argue it represents laziness, or the result of a drunken bet to see if the Tate Modern will show any old wank, however devoid of artistic merit, as long as there's an established artist's name attached.
At least my idea has three different elements.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:23, Reply)
I am not competent right now to explain to you what (if anything) is interesting or important about the work.
I don't know when it was made (he only died this year), how it was painted, how large it is, when it was bought by the Tate, how established Twombly was as an artist when he made it. I haven't even seen the piece of work!
There is a huge amount of data, direct and contextual that you need to understand in order to get, if you will the big picture.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:28, Reply)
That is like saying "Well, he's dead and famous so therefore it must be good"
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:30, Reply)
What I said was almost the exact opposite of that.
The context and intention behind the artwork is important in understanding whether or not it is interesting. It isn't enough to look at the art say 'I don't like it' and move on. That's just as simplistic as saying 'he;s famous therefore its good'.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:35, Reply)
Or when it was made?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
This creates a different context to
He made fucking thousands of the things that all looked the same and the Tate only bought it just after he died because it could get it cheap before the price went up.
Different context again.
I appreciate this might be new to you so sorry if I'm going a bit fast.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:49, Reply)
You either like something or don't. Context doesn't come into it
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
but without understanding the context I doubt I'd find it very funny at all.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:55, Reply)
I know film is "art" before you fucking start
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
maybe the work of Hogarth might be a better example.
Taken out of context it isn't half as interesting, witty and enjoyable.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:07, Reply)
there are already embedded visual clues that allow you to guess pretty accurately at the historical context.Art doesn't exist in a vacuum.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:08, Reply)
Over the course of our visit we joined four tours elaborating on various pieces, and I learned a lot about the artists, their motivations and histories and what was going into some of the work which I otherwise wouldn't have understood at all. Nonetheless certain things leave me totally perplexed as to why anyone would show interest. I can't help but wonder if there were art critics aplenty who were thinking, but didn't dare to say, "Hang on... this is shite!" for fear that their peers would decry them.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:33, Reply)
Imagine if you had a museum devoted to the appreciation of mobile phones.
there would be some which were interesting because they were really well designed and looked really nice, sure but there would be others that it was important to have in the museum because they demonstrated some movement or moment in phone technology, design or use that was interesting and flavoured some other part.
Clearly there are going to be pieces of art that leave us cold. I don't enjoy Cy Twobley's work for instance but I am able to appreciate its place in the grander scheme of art and understanding it allows me to better understand some other artists like Robert Rauschenberg or Jasper Johns, whose work I really enjoy.
then you start to see connections and patterns emerge that allow the work to convey other meanings.
I used to not like Barnet Newman's work very much but I read a lot about some other Jewish American painters at the time and seeing Newman's work and its message within that context gave it a meaning and power I hadn't appreciated in it before.
You want to know what critics thought about the work, go and read what they said! Most critics hate new things, some of the most vociferous and unpleasant things I've read by critics have been against artworks which are now considered masterpieces in their various fields.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:45, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:34, Reply)
I'm not good with words.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:41, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
I do have a point but cannot put it into words. This is probably why I prefer drawing to writing.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:56, Reply)
You'd have to be an artist with a name like that.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:35, Reply)
True, the Tate Modern has a fair amount of modern art in it, it also has some contemporary art and art since 1960.
Is it all of the art that puzzles you or just some bits of it?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:16, Reply)
We spent 6 fucking hours in there on Thursday. I tried so hard to understand and appreciate it for Ms Foxtrot's sake, but some of the stuff in there really is just utter shite that a child could have done.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:56, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:03, Reply)
but the question was "What puzzles you?" and the addition of impressive artwork to unadulterated toss only exacerbates the confusion.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:06, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:10, Reply)
Go to that instead, make up for my not being able to due to the aforementioned six fucking hours. God knows your film appreciation could do with some revision.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:14, Reply)
we walked along the embankment from the Eye, and saw a massive jive-off on a big temporary dance floor.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:17, Reply)
Bloody nightmare to get through wheeling a small suitcase.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:21, Reply)
when they held the vintage market. There were loads of 1950's type shenanigans going on here that week.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:22, Reply)
Had a great views of the closing fireworks from our hotel though. Being on the top floor has its advantages.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
handicrafts, world food, and other overpriced shit.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:25, Reply)
I work on The South Bank and it seems there's always some overpriced something going on.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:29, Reply)
But sometimes I juggle. It's hard to combine the statue part with the juggling admittedly...
(actually I just work in an office near The Shell building).
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:33, Reply)
Ignore him. Darth may have seen the gay 50's thing however.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:31, Reply)
Last year's film festival was great, hope to make some of this year's too.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:22, Reply)
but there's also the actual London Film Museum in County Hall.
The latter is good fun, but not very educmacashional really.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
Always looked pretty cheap and crappy from the outside, I'll check it out if it's any good.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
But it's really a collection of props and costumes and the like, doesn't really tell you a great deal coherently.
It's fun, but don't expect to learn much.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:34, Reply)
But will give it more consideration than I had previously.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
on a 2 for 1 voucher, and it was definitely worth that, but full price...
I dunno, i think most London attractions are overpriced, but you can also get 2 for 1 for most of them with a valid train ticket, so I never pay full price anyway.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:37, Reply)
and I'm trying to get round all the other touristy things at some point as it seems silly to ignore them just because I live locally, might do some in the winter though when there may be less tourists.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
that's probably the exception to the 'not worth the money' claim.
I started to make a point of doing things about 5 years ago when I had an a American friend visiting who was shocked that I kept saying 'I don't know, I've never been' to the question 'what is so and so like?'.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:56, Reply)
My last 2 girlfriends were Russian and German, by birth, both knew London better than I. The Tower of London is the main one I want to do but haven't yet.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:59, Reply)
It taunts me every day, as I use Tower Hill, so I have a daily reminder of my failure to have been in there yet.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:01, Reply)
and try and interest a few friends if I can. IO wonder if any of the London B3tans would be interested, it's a fair bet they've not been either.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:04, Reply)
Its quite cool
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
this is why the Tate Modern is full of interesting and varied artwork not 1000's of stencils of stills from cult films.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread