Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Let's have a philosophical discussion.
Why do people still sell postcards, when everyone has a digital camera or a camera phone?
Alt: What puzzles you?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:38, 251 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
"Wish U where her LOL!"
*feels dirty*
Alt: Anti abortionists.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:40, Reply)
They're wrong but at least we know why they are against it.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:23, Reply)
It's mostly about punishing women for having sex.
www.amptoons.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/pro-life-belief-chart.png
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:33, Reply)
* Why people read (and believe what they read in) the Daily Mail
* Anyone would want to play or watch football
* Exactly how big a cunt you have to be to be one of these fixed wheel cyclist cunts.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:41, Reply)
It's a very interesting game, especially when played well
I don't know what one of those is.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:43, Reply)
I feel like I could sleep for a week. I have a shitload of unpacking and laundry to do before I can even think about starting work again.
At the moment I'm wasting the entire day on here, and trying not to fall asleep.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:46, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:48, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:49, Reply)
A fucking big one. Even worse are the one who pretend to ride fixed gear but have a free-wheel as they aspire to be cunts.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:46, Reply)
I truly hate them. I have a plan to stop all cyclists running red lights - when the light turns to amber a series of wires strung across the road are automatically raised from the ground. Any cunt, regardless of height would then be decapitated if they attempt to run a red light. The wires would then fall when the light turns green.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:00, Reply)
It's the only daily that really covers courts and crime.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:13, Reply)
on a track. The cunts in shoreditch would still be cunt even without the bike.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
I have absolutely no idea at all how it works. I can only assume devilry is at work in there somewhere
*peers down plug*
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:43, Reply)
There's still probably a good sized generation of people who consider postcards the norm and a generation below them who find them nostalgic.
Alt: Cryptic crosswords. My brain just doesn't function in the right way to be able to have the first fucking clue what the answers are.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:44, Reply)
I've got some extremely worrying ones.
There's a mystery one from someone from b3ta which came to my old work address which was pretty fucking scary.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:48, Reply)
Also you cannot stick digital photo's to the fridge, you also cannot always take the same pictures that they have on postcards your self and sometimes, even if you could you'd rather just pay 50p for a post card. In short, you really haven't though this through, have you?
Alt: Why people ask stupid questions. Also what joy people derive from coming on internet messages boards and being consistently cuntish to everyone. Also people in general.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:44, Reply)
1. Why people believe in ghosts, homoeopathy, religion.
2. Why Americans all claim to be 'Irish', 'Italian' etc.
3. Why people wear ties (they seem pretty ridiculous to me)
4. why people with no artistic training feel competent to talk about art and why doesn't this apply to other things.
5. What connection the crisis in Palestine has with cuts to public services in the UK, or any of the other myriad protests you see the Palestinian flag waved at for that matter.
6. Why is it acceptable to wear clothes branded with the emblems and names of the Soviet Union but not ok to go around wearing the equivalent symbols of Nazi German.
7. Why trainers are so expensive.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:45, Reply)
I can't be in the same room as them. And I can tell if they've just been in the rrrom before I got there. And on the odd occasions I haven't been able to get out of eating them, I discovered they taste horrible too.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:57, Reply)
1. Stupidity
2. Stupidity
3. Not a clue
4. It does!
5. They like to riot
6. I NO RITE
7. ??
8. Profit
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:47, Reply)
It doesn't matter how well you wield a paintbrush if no-one likes your paintings.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:52, Reply)
I just hate the pretentiousness of "It show mankind's struggle agsint consumerism, juxtaposed with the suffering of the red squirrel" fucking bollocks that they all go on about.
No, its a picture/sculpture/etc...
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:02, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:08, Reply)
I dont have to understand the Mona Lisa but I can appreciate that is is quite well painted
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:10, Reply)
Art can make us think as well as smile or feel sad. A lot of modern art leaves me cold too and I went to art school.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:14, Reply)
It is just the whole unmade bed with condoms shite that gets on my tits. I even like some of Damien Hirst's stuff
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:15, Reply)
It involved a life size rag doll and a video on loop of my face being slapped. There were other factors but for the life of me I can't remember.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:20, Reply)
He stood in the corner of a room with a lampshade on his head and a video camera as a piece once
W.T.F.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:22, Reply)
A person who understands art a little better might get more from it than you and might well be better qualified to talk about it.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:20, Reply)
If I wrote a novel, it wouldn't be reviewed by people who couldn't read very well, people who couldn't read at all couldn't really hope to experience it as it was intended, obviously they could get an audiobook or have someone explain it to them but something essential to it would be lost.
It would be common ground amongst most people that an expert in literature would be better placed to pass judgement on the novel and whilst people with no formal education in literature were free to read the novel and comment on it, in any consultation about the novel their opinion would not carry the same weight.
It seems to me that people with no formal education or training in art seem much happier to chime in with 'I know what I like' and 'a 5 year old could have done it' and expect to be taken seriously. This puzzles me and I don't think it should be indulged.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
They are just giving their opinion whether right or wrong. I'm quite well read for a non literature buff but I wouldn't expect anyone to take my opinion seriously when judging a book.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:30, Reply)
because they have no formal training in literature?
*edit* What I mean is the same as Blousie really. just because people have an opinion on something doesn't mean they will be taken seriously at all. I went to Vatican City and had a look at all the fancy paintings and statues. I know nothing of Ancient Roman Art but I still felt qualified to say to people, hey you should go see that stuff it was awesome.
The people who comment on art with no formal training seem to only get told off for it when they say something negative. When they say "I love that bed/shark/glass of water" no-one has a problem. When they say "That's shit" they're opinion isn't valid because they aren't trained.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:31, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:38, Reply)
99% of the stuff I see created is toss but the students strut about like they are geniuses. My brother has a fine art degree, he is 23, unemployed and has only ever found unskilled labouring jobs.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:43, Reply)
Obviously spelling and punctuation are the artist's paintbrush in that respect.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:26, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:59, Reply)
1) Because they want to explain what is conceptually unexplainable to them; I am one of these people.
2) Because they're seriously culturly insecure in regards to their roots.
3) To add an air of occasion to an occasion; in my case.
4) Because unless the 'art' is made to only be viewed by the fellow art comunity, then it is made for public concumption, and as such, they are allowed to have an opinion on that something.
5) Donno
6) Donno eaither.
7) Gross mark-ups between the manufacturing owners and the high street. I don't see 'nike' as the ones taking advantage of the poor, but more like who Nike are paying to manufacture. And to tell you the truth, a lot of people in these poor countries are waaay better off under a sweatshop system than not; at least they can eat. Not saying it's right, not in the slightest, but it's the owners of these sweatshops who are doing the grose abuse of people... but ask any of them if they'd rather earn $1/day and be able to eat, or earn nothing and not, most of them would say they would preffer it.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:20, Reply)
Why does my nephew hate nuts. I don't think he's ever eaten one.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:48, Reply)
As a vegetarian's boyfriend, I'm pretty sure I would have either starved to death or staged some sort of anti-Tofu (dirty) protest by now if not for mushrooms.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:03, Reply)
in a bun with mustard. Fucking nom
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:06, Reply)
What is the fucking point? Seriously? It tastes *nothing* like meat.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:12, Reply)
why do they have 'quorn sausages', 'quorn mince', 'quorn fish fingers' etc?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:23, Reply)
But it's vastly preferable to Tofu when bulking out a stir fry, believe me.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:17, Reply)
What I don't like is when it's pretending to be meat though
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:20, Reply)
replaces "friend of Dorothy" as top bumder euphamism.
sorry Darth old chap, for once this isn't a memeattack, I just think it sounds brilliant and covers all the bases
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:38, Reply)
With I be to tired by then?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:37, Reply)
Alt: Christians, Manchester, the Tate Modern, the enduring popularity of Harry Hill, science
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:49, Reply)
China is famous for it's pottery skillz.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:55, Reply)
for making 10 million seeds out of clay. It is art with a silent F
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:57, Reply)
but I'm pretty sure that if I asked to suspend an AK-47 wrapped in a doily from the ceiling by a pair of green tights I'd be told to get to fuck, and rightly so.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:09, Reply)
but I suspect that's because almost no thought whatsoever has gone into the work.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:17, Reply)
in which he has literally gone to town on each with a red brush. Apparently it signifies rage and ecstasy. I would argue it represents laziness, or the result of a drunken bet to see if the Tate Modern will show any old wank, however devoid of artistic merit, as long as there's an established artist's name attached.
At least my idea has three different elements.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:23, Reply)
I am not competent right now to explain to you what (if anything) is interesting or important about the work.
I don't know when it was made (he only died this year), how it was painted, how large it is, when it was bought by the Tate, how established Twombly was as an artist when he made it. I haven't even seen the piece of work!
There is a huge amount of data, direct and contextual that you need to understand in order to get, if you will the big picture.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:28, Reply)
That is like saying "Well, he's dead and famous so therefore it must be good"
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:30, Reply)
What I said was almost the exact opposite of that.
The context and intention behind the artwork is important in understanding whether or not it is interesting. It isn't enough to look at the art say 'I don't like it' and move on. That's just as simplistic as saying 'he;s famous therefore its good'.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:35, Reply)
Or when it was made?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
This creates a different context to
He made fucking thousands of the things that all looked the same and the Tate only bought it just after he died because it could get it cheap before the price went up.
Different context again.
I appreciate this might be new to you so sorry if I'm going a bit fast.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:49, Reply)
You either like something or don't. Context doesn't come into it
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
but without understanding the context I doubt I'd find it very funny at all.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:55, Reply)
I know film is "art" before you fucking start
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
maybe the work of Hogarth might be a better example.
Taken out of context it isn't half as interesting, witty and enjoyable.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:07, Reply)
there are already embedded visual clues that allow you to guess pretty accurately at the historical context.Art doesn't exist in a vacuum.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:08, Reply)
Over the course of our visit we joined four tours elaborating on various pieces, and I learned a lot about the artists, their motivations and histories and what was going into some of the work which I otherwise wouldn't have understood at all. Nonetheless certain things leave me totally perplexed as to why anyone would show interest. I can't help but wonder if there were art critics aplenty who were thinking, but didn't dare to say, "Hang on... this is shite!" for fear that their peers would decry them.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:33, Reply)
Imagine if you had a museum devoted to the appreciation of mobile phones.
there would be some which were interesting because they were really well designed and looked really nice, sure but there would be others that it was important to have in the museum because they demonstrated some movement or moment in phone technology, design or use that was interesting and flavoured some other part.
Clearly there are going to be pieces of art that leave us cold. I don't enjoy Cy Twobley's work for instance but I am able to appreciate its place in the grander scheme of art and understanding it allows me to better understand some other artists like Robert Rauschenberg or Jasper Johns, whose work I really enjoy.
then you start to see connections and patterns emerge that allow the work to convey other meanings.
I used to not like Barnet Newman's work very much but I read a lot about some other Jewish American painters at the time and seeing Newman's work and its message within that context gave it a meaning and power I hadn't appreciated in it before.
You want to know what critics thought about the work, go and read what they said! Most critics hate new things, some of the most vociferous and unpleasant things I've read by critics have been against artworks which are now considered masterpieces in their various fields.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:45, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:34, Reply)
I'm not good with words.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:41, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
I do have a point but cannot put it into words. This is probably why I prefer drawing to writing.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:56, Reply)
You'd have to be an artist with a name like that.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:35, Reply)
True, the Tate Modern has a fair amount of modern art in it, it also has some contemporary art and art since 1960.
Is it all of the art that puzzles you or just some bits of it?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:16, Reply)
We spent 6 fucking hours in there on Thursday. I tried so hard to understand and appreciate it for Ms Foxtrot's sake, but some of the stuff in there really is just utter shite that a child could have done.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:56, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:03, Reply)
but the question was "What puzzles you?" and the addition of impressive artwork to unadulterated toss only exacerbates the confusion.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:06, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:10, Reply)
Go to that instead, make up for my not being able to due to the aforementioned six fucking hours. God knows your film appreciation could do with some revision.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:14, Reply)
we walked along the embankment from the Eye, and saw a massive jive-off on a big temporary dance floor.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:17, Reply)
Bloody nightmare to get through wheeling a small suitcase.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:21, Reply)
when they held the vintage market. There were loads of 1950's type shenanigans going on here that week.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:22, Reply)
Had a great views of the closing fireworks from our hotel though. Being on the top floor has its advantages.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
handicrafts, world food, and other overpriced shit.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:25, Reply)
I work on The South Bank and it seems there's always some overpriced something going on.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:29, Reply)
But sometimes I juggle. It's hard to combine the statue part with the juggling admittedly...
(actually I just work in an office near The Shell building).
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:33, Reply)
Ignore him. Darth may have seen the gay 50's thing however.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:31, Reply)
Last year's film festival was great, hope to make some of this year's too.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:22, Reply)
but there's also the actual London Film Museum in County Hall.
The latter is good fun, but not very educmacashional really.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:24, Reply)
Always looked pretty cheap and crappy from the outside, I'll check it out if it's any good.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
But it's really a collection of props and costumes and the like, doesn't really tell you a great deal coherently.
It's fun, but don't expect to learn much.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:34, Reply)
But will give it more consideration than I had previously.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
on a 2 for 1 voucher, and it was definitely worth that, but full price...
I dunno, i think most London attractions are overpriced, but you can also get 2 for 1 for most of them with a valid train ticket, so I never pay full price anyway.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:37, Reply)
and I'm trying to get round all the other touristy things at some point as it seems silly to ignore them just because I live locally, might do some in the winter though when there may be less tourists.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
that's probably the exception to the 'not worth the money' claim.
I started to make a point of doing things about 5 years ago when I had an a American friend visiting who was shocked that I kept saying 'I don't know, I've never been' to the question 'what is so and so like?'.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:56, Reply)
My last 2 girlfriends were Russian and German, by birth, both knew London better than I. The Tower of London is the main one I want to do but haven't yet.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:59, Reply)
It taunts me every day, as I use Tower Hill, so I have a daily reminder of my failure to have been in there yet.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:01, Reply)
and try and interest a few friends if I can. IO wonder if any of the London B3tans would be interested, it's a fair bet they've not been either.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:04, Reply)
Its quite cool
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
this is why the Tate Modern is full of interesting and varied artwork not 1000's of stencils of stills from cult films.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:32, Reply)
taking your own photos is all very well, but usually you can't get the best view because the weather is shit, or your vantage point isn't as good as the professional photographer ones. And they're fun to receive; it's a lot more personal than a text or seeing somebody's holiday snaps on facebook.
Creationists. I understand why some people believe in God; that's fine as long as you don't try and persuade me that you're right and I'm wrong. But creationism...words fail me, they really do. I'll just have to settle for this: *BELM*
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 12:54, Reply)
something about a newsletter, I forget.
Also, how most Christians ignore most of the stuff Jesus(allegedly) said.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:05, Reply)
'Why do old people wear so much ape snot?'
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:18, Reply)
and the respect for the aged of an Eskimo.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:19, Reply)
a postcard of my cat eating pizza.
And I can't take a photo of some bare breasts painted to resemble mice saying 'All the breast from London'
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:21, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:27, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:28, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:29, Reply)
... I can see how occasionally, or even more times than not, not being bothered.... but claiming they actually can't knock up some pasta and stir-in sauce (for example) is so beyond me. For a fully functioning adult.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:31, Reply)
He's about 50, and has managed to reach that age with absolutely no dpomestic skills at all. He cannot iron (his 23 year old daughter comes round to do this for him) or cook. At all.
My brother was peeling some potatoes and he came over and asked him what he was doing. He didn't know how boiled potatoes were cooked.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:39, Reply)
They grew up with Ma' or Gran cooking, only left home when they got wives, ended up devorced and back at their ma's place... some of them got their sisters to come 'round and do it all for them too. I think it's quite pathetic to tell you the truth, some of them can put together an edible steak, but that's about it.
Which is really really strange considering how embedded food is into their culture.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:36, Reply)
Mathematics is far more beautiful.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:48, Reply)
* truth be told she's a bit of munter
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:50, Reply)
So isn't actually as munterish as you might imagine
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:54, Reply)
48, Blonde, slim, goes to those bloody zumba classes and swims a lot. Likes 70's rock music, owns a Yamaha FJ1200 and 2 proper arcade pinball machines, drinks pints and like live music. Got married in Vegas by Elvis to her third husband two years ago, he is a 6'4" massive biker dude.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:09, Reply)
Personally I don't particularly see the beauty in Maths in the same way, or appreciate it as such, but I doubt you will call me a philistine or impugn my ability to judge based on this.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:51, Reply)
Some people have maths brains and some do not.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
'This is crap, I don't get it, its rubbish my 5 year old daughter could have done it, its just lines on a page and random numbers'
would you?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
and don't feel like idiots.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:58, Reply)
and the bloke was bad at maths.
Does that then validate the same opinion? 'This is crap I don't understand it, my daughter etc'
Of course not.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:01, Reply)
The beauty of maths is in the patterns and symmetries, etc.
11,22,33
9,19,27 all adding up to 9, etc.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:08, Reply)
I don't understand maths, I've never really been taught it beyond GCSE level, in this conversation your opinion carries much more weight.
Why doesn't this apply to art? Where does the idea that once an artist makes a piece of work the public somehow own it, I don't make art for other people, I make it for me and people that might be interested in it.
I suspect mathematicians couldn't give a fig what bloke in the street thinks about their work.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:11, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:14, Reply)
It's only when art is displayed in a public that it invites comment. When the comments are positive its fine, when they are negative they are unqualified to comment.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:18, Reply)
Whether they are 'experts' or not. It comes with the territory.
There are some artists who are technically very good but paint boring pictures. Which is more important, the knowledge and ability or the message?
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:09, Reply)
Why do we tolerate this in art when we wouldn't tolerate it in any other area of human endeavour. It might be that art is just really unimportant, that might be the answer, I don't know. Hence it being one of my puzzles.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 13:59, Reply)
Maths solves problems, statues don't
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:00, Reply)
See the continuation of the Roman equestrian statue throughout history
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:06, Reply)
It's one of the things that sets us apart from the animals.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:03, Reply)
It is just nice (in some cases), scary, good, bad, pretentious, etc.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:05, Reply)
My Daughter can count but she can't do multiplications
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:11, Reply)
It taps it's hoof 4 times. I've seem it, it was dead impressive.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:12, Reply)
Like when that bloke in that film taught his kid to spell really long words but she couldn't spell cat. I bet the horse couldn't spell cat either!
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:26, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:17, Reply)
and apes have been knows to use white clay to paint in the wild
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:23, Reply)
I cannot do art, does this make me not human?
It's not that I doubt the importance of art, I just don't think it's essential to being human.
Same goes for Maths BTW.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:31, Reply)
of course art is important as it is another way of documenting history. Like music for example.
If we destroyed every artwork would the world end? No but it would be less interesting.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:05, Reply)
Art's a personal experience.
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:04, Reply)
If someone wrote 2+2=4 on a piece of paper unless it was done by your 3 year old kid no-one would be impressed the same goes for people who look art and go "but a 5 year old could have done that"
People don't generally go up to beautifully complicated paintings and say they are crap. They go up to the artwork that appears lazy and say it.
Believe me, there really are a lot of people in the maths world saying "That huge complicated equation is crap!"
(, Wed 21 Sep 2011, 14:02, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »
