
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm failing to care that much.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:20, 8 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

an indpendent body is reviewing it, no decision has been made yet, they are sure to say no pay rises, it'll go away for another year.
shut up.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:22, Reply)

After the expenses thing MPs cant decide their own wages so it is being forced upon them. However they are also saying to cut the expenses side of things so you get greater remuneration up front so it balances out...
That said there was quite an interesting thing a couple of weeks ago show what MP's thought they should be paid. Both Labour and Lib said around 70k odd (I don't recall the exact figure) and the Cons went with 90k odd.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:33, Reply)

like you say, due to the change in expenses, but 70-90k for a politician is huge money.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:43, Reply)

If wages relate to responsibility, then surely they ate underpaid, also their career may only last 5 years.
I doubt however that any of them are there fir the money. Power is worth a lot, lot more.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:49, Reply)

there is plenty they can go on to after the 5 years.
Money should be based on responsibility to a point, but if you're serving the public need, and the public are facing pay freezes and changes, surely you should be on level.
To be honest, i don't know enough about the expense changes to know if this is a pay rise, or a cut overall, with a pay rise to take over from other benefit losses.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:54, Reply)

I wouldn't pay the twat in used festering condoms, never mind give the thieving, lying, pocket-lining, self-serving bellend any REAL money.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:24, Reply)

Add the working hours, holidays, expenses, directorships, subsidies, second homes, etc, and the salary part is a small part of the pie.
Same with any job, look at the package, and with MPs salary is probably a smaller part of it than most jobs. For example at least one MP claimed over £100k in expenses last year.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:25, Reply)

Which was to have MP wages fixed to 10x the minimum wage.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:33, Reply)

I can't remember it though.
/csb
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:34, Reply)

how can you stop someone who owns a company from paying their staff or themselves what they want?
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:51, Reply)

The point is more to keep wages in proportion, so if the CEO wants to award himself a 20% pay rise, then the lowest earners in the company also get a 20% pay rise.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:55, Reply)

( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:31, Reply)

( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 20:50, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread