
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

This weekend, I watched Rosemary's Baby - I'd never seen it before.
Am I alone in thinking that, aside from the gratuitous tit action, there's no reason at all for it to be anything other than a PG?
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:30, 23 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

How far in? We need timings, duration, approx area of exposed breast and marks out of ten.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:37, Reply)

...I was too busy watching "Die Screaming With Sharp Things In Your Head" with the kids.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:05, Reply)

And possibly partly because what we found shocking/horrific/pant-shittingly scary 40 years ago just doesn't have the same impact these days.
After all the original Universal horror movies (Frankenstein, Dracula) were considered to be seriously scary stuff in the 30s. Find them on DVD now and they'll have a PG certificate.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:14, Reply)

I still can't watch the Exorcist though because of how frightened I was watching it when I was younger.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:16, Reply)

the level of violent content over the years is inversely proportional to the difficulty of A-levels over the same time period. FACT.
Personally, I blame global warming.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:17, Reply)

Arthur Scargill scared the hell out of me as a kid.
(edit)
In a rare moment of seriousness, I think desensitisation is a natural part of growing up. I recall watching a run of 1950's sci fi B movies as a child of ten and cowering under a blanket.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:19, Reply)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the film in your first post was a RD quote, was it not?
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:31, Reply)

Krzysztof Komeda's score is worth a PG alone - it scares the poo out of me.
How were Mia Farrow's tits?
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:35, Reply)

To some extent, yes. But there doesn't seem to be all that much psychological pressure in R's B either. It's a bit of a soap-opera for the most part.
(Compare it to something like The Orphanage, which has genuine jump-out-of-your-skin moments and a wonderful tension; ditto something like Audition - that scene with the acupuncture needles doesn't show anything, but it's scary as fuck.)
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:40, Reply)

Audition!
I almost chewed my fist off during the last 30 minutes of that film!
Even worse than Oldboy and the tongue scene
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:54, Reply)

What was that film with Dustin Hoffman being strapped into a dentists chair and tortured with picks and drills by Donald Pleasance? The thought of that gives me nightmares...
...and that film was released in the early 70s.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:04, Reply)

Sounds like Marathon Man. It's Larry Olivier doing the torture, though.
Well, after having made a career butchering Shakespeare, it was a natural progression...
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:07, Reply)

beat me to it enzyme!
is it safe? is it safe?
The original Texas chainsaw massacre is still a scary scary film
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:08, Reply)

marathon man.
that's a fucking scary movie too. That scene actually reminds me of the torture scene in the novel nineteen eighty four by George Orwell (aka Eric Arthur Blair).
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:10, Reply)

The Orphanage? Scary? Maybe you watched a different version to me, cause I found it quite dull TBH
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:14, Reply)

Thank you Enzyme - I don't know how I managed to remember it as Donald Pleasance and not Olivier. Cheers for putting me straight.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:16, Reply)

Yes - Texas is very good. And, oddly, a lot less gratuitous than its reputation suggests.
@flesh - What I like about The Orphanage is exactly the way that the mundane is used so that when the tense or jumpy moments come, you really feel it. The ambulance scene, for example, comes from nowhere and is like being punched.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:18, Reply)

I remember watching it for the first time in the late 80's / early 90's - had a friend who had all sorts of banned (at the time) vids.
It's unsettling as most of the violence is impled, combined with a very unnerving soundtrack. And the only time you actually see any chainsaw action is when Leatherface falls near the end and cuts his own leg open.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:25, Reply)

That was a black screen, audio only.
It got banned for being too disturbing.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:53, Reply)

The mind fills in the gaps, and is a lot more scary than any film could be.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the original Texas, I don't believe you see anyone get chainsawed, it all happens off screen. I think the most graphic bit you see is the meathook bit, but my memory isn't too good, s'been a while since I saw it.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:58, Reply)

Two spring to mind which really disturbed me.
They're both PG. One deals with a nuclear attack and the other is about first contact with aliens that goes disasterously wrong.
What made them so scary was that they were filmed as a sequence of live news reports, both featuring real news anchor people. It's all implied, but it's the imagination that scares me rather than the gore. Stuff like Saw etc just strikes me as needlessly sadistic.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:07, Reply)

you're right.
The first Fields of the Nephilim album, Dawnrazor, had samples from TCM (and Evil Dead, I think) on a couple of tracks. Creepy as fuck when heard out of context.
( , Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:16, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »