Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
In the spirit of the normal QOTW OT format, i.e., "I am something because of something. What has somethinged you today?", I have the fucking rage.
Why, you might not ask because you don't give a flying fig?
Because on the news this morning, I saw that a family with 12 children are complaining because they might get evicted from their council house because they make too much noise and piss off the neighbours. They were interviewed and the, frankly, fucking scary, wife said "the kids caaaant have kids round to play. We've asked the council for a farmhouse or whatever but they caaaant do nuffink".
For FUCK'S SAKE. I found myself shouting at the television "Well, STOP POPPING THEM OUT THEN, YOU STUPID WOMAN". If she can't afford her own fucking farmhouse to gate up her herd of 12 bloody children (aged 3 to 19), then why the HELL should the tax payers fork out for it? Jesus. I tell you, it's the bloody race to the bottom.
There, I feel much better now.
Actually, I don't. Fucksocks.
So, what have you done recently that you thought would make you feel much better, but, with hindsight, made no fucking difference at all?
Tea. Must drink tea. Lots of calming tea. Tea.teatea...tea....
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 8:46, 78 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Now I want to die - so in a sense it did make a difference. To my ability to function as a normal human being.
The end.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 8:53, Reply)
And you mean big man-sized bottle, not junior airline bottles for kiddies, right?
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 8:56, Reply)
Lightweight! Tinkerbell phoned she wants her fairy dust back!
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:17, Reply)
I'll try harder tonight.
EDIT it was the fucking 'fairy dust' that got me into this mess in the first place...
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:19, Reply)
IT MADE A DIFFERENCE, DIDN'T IT?
How about an easier question: Fruit tea. The devil's watered down semen or God's gift to rehydration for those that have had too much caffeine, but like hot drinks?
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 8:55, Reply)
herbal ain't so bad though, like peppermint, chamomile tea, those "refresh" ones.
But the fruity ones are SICKENING
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:00, Reply)
Hot fruit drinks can be okay. Just have to be careful what you call it.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:00, Reply)
Quite often I get the "green tea with lemon", "green tea with mint", "green tea with mango". They're pretty good.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:03, Reply)
I prefer them to normal tea.
Now, I agree that if it doesn't have tea on it WHY DO YOU CALL IT TEA??
It doesn't make sense...
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:19, Reply)
mainly because drinking 10 cups of tea a day turned me into a spitting ball of fury, and i refuse to drink decaf, so i'm down to to one cup or real tea in the morning then whatevers on my desk (Green tea with lemon, strawberry & mango and Fennel)
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:38, Reply)
You know green tea has MORE caffeine than regular tea and even coffee, right?
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:12, Reply)
or at least, it may have more by weight, but the amount you use and the length of infusion makes a huge difference.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:18, Reply)
It's a sort of tea, surely?
The Twinings ones are not toooo bad. After I've coffeed myself up, I do switch to the odd fruit tea.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:31, Reply)
*gets chased out of east end by cockney wideboys*
*invades Hampshire instead*
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:26, Reply)
Expecting to feel fresh, energetic and wonderful every day.
This was not the case. So I returned to the evil drink and now I'm back where I started..
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 8:59, Reply)
the festive season is probably the time to make my return I reckon..
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:45, Reply)
So that's 6 children punished for each 1. Yeah makes sense.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:06, Reply)
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:09, Reply)
I want to compare your views to Fascism
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:12, Reply)
so that's a pointless line of argument.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:17, Reply)
genuinely curious. I don't have any ideas
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:18, Reply)
if they're causing constant trouble to the neighbourhood then they should be moved. Obviously that'll be a problem because there aren't many suitable properties.
but there aren't any simple solutions. That's not my point, my point is that saying "SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!" is stupid especially when you start thinking of them as 14 people rather than 1 family.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:28, Reply)
you are, of course, right. As there is no law saying how many kids you can have, then they are entitled to the same as everyone else.
She should still be kicked in the twat though.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:31, Reply)
in terms of IQ or mental illness. You can't stop people having kids though, you just have to make sure that they don't mistreat them, which I'm sure the council are doing.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:35, Reply)
don't be silly.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:45, Reply)
it means you can spread the abuse between them, rather than concentrating it all on one
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:47, Reply)
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:50, Reply)
*for the second time today, invades Poland*
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:52, Reply)
Yeah, it's a tough one alright. Let's just encourage rampant breeding by anyone who can stick the long bit into the hole. And it does seem odd to indirectly compare the Chinese to fascists, there are many things, but I didn't think they were that.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:34, Reply)
oh and what part of the country/government/society encourages rampant child birth? Our birth rate has been falling since the 50's (may be going up again in the last 6 months)
One example of a family is not a trend or indicative of a systematic failure.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:37, Reply)
... by all reasonable estimates, it's meant that the population of this poor likkle planet is half a billion fewer than it would otherwise be. And no part of the government or society encourages rampant sprogging - it's such a tiny percentage of people doing this that it isn't even statistically valid. But since you've read so much between the lines, you feel free to interpret any old opinion you want since you're already doing a jolly fine job of it.
Alternatively, we could talk about tea and kittens rather than being guilty of being serious on the internet.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:45, Reply)
and frankly either is preferable to talk of kittens
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:46, Reply)
Agreed on the kittens, agreed on the other bit too. Agreement. On the Internet. Twice.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:49, Reply)
It also means that there are hundreds of orphanages filled with female children that are just abbandoned. A massive increase in infanticide. A disproportionate effect on the rural poor over the urban elite.
There are two ways to reduce birth rate. Access to contraception and education. That's what has worked in every developed country.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:52, Reply)
On both counts. Contraception and education are best placed to equip people to make appropriate decisions. And just for the avoidance of doubt, incidentally, my rage in the initial post does not indicate I feel that the kiddies of these parents should suffer: I also agree that the best opportunity to avoid a loop where any of them repeat this situation is through support and education, but primarily, education. And the Chinese comment was poorly chosen: it's a situation that is too complex to be slapped in as a comparison to today's media wind-up story.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:57, Reply)
If you're worried about rampant breeding but don't want to embark on a mass sterisiation project, let's just stop all fertility treatments. Ban IVF. Withdraw Clomid. Abolish Early Pregnancy Clinics. I bet it'd go some ways to evening out the numbers nicely.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:17, Reply)
Without a valid licence, the NHS or at least our local trust has pretty much banned it already.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:54, Reply)
Kill it, eat it or fuck it.
Or any combination of the three.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:15, Reply)
Apart from my sister obviously.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:17, Reply)
*starts rammy*
^ NEW WORD OF THE DAY. GREENOCK COLOQUIALISM FOR 'A SCRAP'. I insist on everyone using this great word - or I'll start a fucking rammy, pal.
(see, it's easy)
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:55, Reply)
But a mixture of old age, mild drug abuse and the invention of the spellcheck has buggered it up.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:02, Reply)
By dinner time you will be sitting in a trendy Shoreditch bar glugging back a litre of Buckfast and stubbing fags out on childrens faces.
Fuck it, it's Friday after all.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:25, Reply)
Last year the BBC interviewed a single mother who couldnt afford new shoes for her children. They just happened to interview her in her plush living-room which had a massive TV with surround sound and a couple of games consols in the background.
*shrugs*
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:20, Reply)
They cost about twice as much eventually as someone who can buy them in cash or even on a credit card. It's one of the reasons the poor stay poor and those companies really are fucking scum.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:31, Reply)
That's why these companies aggressivley advertise to them, and deliberatly use obtuse and vague language in their terms and conditions.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:41, Reply)
advertising cash loans of between £10 and £300 - 'no need to make payments at a bank, we will call round and collect each week'.
I'll bet you fucking will. With a crowbar.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:43, Reply)
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:44, Reply)
and I'd have ended up in a motorway bridge within a month.
Gawd love the East End.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:57, Reply)
Not everyone is a rampant breeder without considering how their children are going to be housed, fed or cared for. The media, eh? Winding people up since 1642.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 9:36, Reply)
The wank I had last night to distract me from my crippling loneliness.
Didn't work.
But was still good.
(, Fri 11 Dec 2009, 10:05, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »