Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
I have been getting loads of electric shocks from my car. It doesn't happen to anyone else, and it's when I get in the car as well as when I get out.
Most of the stuff about it on the internet bangs on about it being to do with building up a static charge between my clothes and the car upholstery but as it happens when I touch the car to open the door and get in this is not the case.
Anyone got any ideas?
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:36, 158 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
so possession is the only logical answer
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:38, Reply)
He said nurses kick hospital beds for the same reason.
I don't know if this works. He's a bit loopy.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:40, Reply)
and it just makes it more surprising when I get shocked
last night for instance, I got out of the car, got shocked in the leg that touched the door sill, shocked in the hand that shut the door, and then most surprisingly shocked again, harder, when I opened the boot.
It's amusing when I get in the car without touching it, give the mrs a kiss and shock her.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:42, Reply)
it's kind of amusing. was just after a better explanation than those I found by googling it.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:49, Reply)
maybe you've got a nervous habit of stroking your beard a lot or cloth in general. I did hear a remedy once, something about grounding your car. I'll try to remember
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:44, Reply)
taht as the car tarvels through the air it picks up a charge from the air and dust particles rushing over the surface causing friction and consequently a static charge.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:45, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:46, Reply)
A small strip of rubber to ground the car against lightning strikes? As opposed to the four fucking massive bits of rubber already in contact with the road?!
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:49, Reply)
don't they?
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:51, Reply)
and yes, yes you were
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:54, Reply)
The rubber gave flexibilty.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:52, Reply)
could be the type of clothes you're wearing, the carpet in your house etc... if you're wearing rubber soled shoes then you'll get the shock as soon as any charged part of you comes into contact with a grounded object, such as your car.
yo can get round this by creating tinfoil grounding strips that attach to your legs drag along on the ground, ensuring you never build up a charge; you will look like a bit of a 'tard though.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:46, Reply)
The reverse can also be true, where you car builds up the charge and then uses you as a grounding strip. you can get grounding strips for your car from any car type shop
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:48, Reply)
and I'm fairly sure it's happened on other cars as well
so it must be me, but as I said below, it's been all different sorts of clothes and shoes.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:50, Reply)
but it is a large conductive object which is at a lower potential than you are, if you've been walking around in rubber soled shoes, and with a sufficiently larger capacitance than you, such that when you touch the metalwork, a current flows from you to the car.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:56, Reply)
and not to other people anywhere near as much. I wear pretty ordinary shoes.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:58, Reply)
Always has done. I was quite a curiosity at school because of this!
Some people just hold a charge better than others.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:59, Reply)
not to be faectious, but long haired/ bearded people seem to hold a charge better. I've got long hair and I'm pretty much walking static on a hot day
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:01, Reply)
and am clean shaven for the most part. But I can understand your logic.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:02, Reply)
eh, eh, eh...
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:03, Reply)
is that we are better than most other people?
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:12, Reply)
during one afternoon lab, I managed to blow three electronics experiments with my massive static charge.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:16, Reply)
zapped the headphones on a listening station in WHSmith and broke it
I saw the spark. it was awesome.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:25, Reply)
on account of our sparky goodnature, shocking sense of humour and grounded personality.
I make no apology
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:14, Reply)
and shoes as well
and has only been happening for the last month or so
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:48, Reply)
has the weather changed in the past month, e.g. sunny and dry?
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:49, Reply)
however, the weather is the only thing that seems to correlate with it happening.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:51, Reply)
is more likely to dissipate the charge which you've built up. Low humidity makes for lots of sparks!
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:57, Reply)
is to get a grounding strip/strap for your car... you've probably seen then about, they're plastic looking strips that hang down from the rear underside of the car, some have strips of lightning on them.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:06, Reply)
sometimes you can find them as just a kind of woven metal thread... but they're way less cool than the plastic lightning strips.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:12, Reply)
It's definitely the work of mischievous pixies.
Rubbing their balloons and touching you invisibly.
You know you love it.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:50, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:27, Reply)
then you'll smell more like a monkey as well.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:30, Reply)
then you'll be stuck until shearing season
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:53, Reply)
designed to prevent dangerous levels of smug building up while driving.
Every single Prius has one.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:52, Reply)
There is a small chance - no more than 15% or 20% - that the static will ignite vapour from the fuel system, or acid fumes from the battery. This would create a brief fireball effect within the car, and in extreme cases might cause the vehicle to explode into a raging inferno. Try to be prepared for this.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:53, Reply)
my car is diesel. hopefully that should minimise the fireball risk.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:54, Reply)
such as if you were on a day trip to Venus, but then again the atmosphere is mainly Carbon dioxide and Nitrogen so combustion would be all but impossible.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:57, Reply)
then my car fuel tank exploding would be the least of my problems
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 11:59, Reply)
There might be women with three boobs!
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:00, Reply)
Mindpiss.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:03, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:04, Reply)
would both still burn though, if you got them hot enough to get started.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:01, Reply)
It is static, more noticeable in dry,hot weather. Wet weather reduces the build-up and also eases discharge.
The clothes you wear much a large difference, as does the seat cover material. I have not noticed any difference dependent on shoe soles.
I have a theory that car paint finishes contribute to this.
Grounding strips do reduce the build up. If you find a permanent cure tell the internet.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:04, Reply)
it's not the car, because it doesn't happen to others
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:11, Reply)
Only on very hot, dry, nights do I get a discharge*
I suspect your clothes (and I'm sure others do too) are causing some of the problem. Probably those purple nylon y-fronts you favour.
More importantly - where do you camp in Cornwall? Ever wild camp?
*Joke recycled as no-one even tittered before.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:19, Reply)
I get most shocks on sunny dry days though
I usually camp at Porthcothan in Cornwall. The site we got to is as lacking in amenities as possible. it has toilets and showers (20p a go) and that's it. costs £2.50 a night off peak, and about £5 in mid-summer.
There is a lovely lagoon just a few fields walk away.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:23, Reply)
This is a good one too and near some great beaches, and good walks. Not so good for nearby pubs.
There's another I'm keen to get to at Polly Joke. I have their phone number but can't recall the site name. Fantastic location.
Here you go
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:28, Reply)
at a great location. had to go through a number of gates to get there, surrounded my little hills, short walk down a path to the beach and the toilets had a fig tree near them. same one?
what I like about porthcothan is that the site allows fires, they don't give a shit about noise.
I've seen someone arrive there in a helicopter
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:36, Reply)
Fires, Good.
Helicopters, I can live without. (Unless it's an air ambulance.)(Or AirSea rescue.)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:40, Reply)
says invalid country
my work internet goes through the netherlands
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 13:00, Reply)
The site is called Franchis (say Franky's) on the Lizard.
Bit of a hike.
www.franchis.co.uk Edit - disregard. Bad link was for Polly Joke which site you know.
Aren't you just itching to get out there? I've had a new Vango Tempest since last November and not used it yet. It has a mesh skylight to watch the stars. I'm camping this weekend by the Thames, but it will be hard work. But at least it's under canvas. Yay!
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
that would be awesome - considering I'm in Aus and I don't actually don't HAVE one. Nor can I grow one. :(
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:04, Reply)
you spend an inordinate amount of time trying to stop people seeing it.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:08, Reply)
For a minute there, I thought Al was talking about your fanny.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:10, Reply)
Way too confused. I think alcohol will solve this.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:19, Reply)
except worrying lizards
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:26, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:27, Reply)
*points at Vipros*
Got it in one you homophobic child abuser.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:44, Reply)
why he wouldn't want to see nudey pics of a young* Australian girl then.
Makes sense.
*but old enough
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:47, Reply)
Or am I Raiden?
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:19, Reply)
This is probably due to some problem with your electrical supply.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:23, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:25, Reply)
this will cease to be a problem, seeing as the EU has consigned us all to a life of gloom by insisting that we use these energy saving CFL lamps.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:28, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:30, Reply)
the cheapo 8 watt ones that are given away free by power companies and newspapers. When you first switch them on you're rewarded with a faint brown glow, which improves over time to something akin to candlelight.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:31, Reply)
plus they look ugly. Wickes do nice looking bulbs, and they aren't that pricey.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:35, Reply)
just ignore the 11 watts is equivalent to a 60 watt bollocks and buy a 14 watt bulb instead (or whatever the numbers are, I don't know exactly). Job done. I really don't see what people's stupid attachment to horrifically inefficient methods of lighting are. A tungsten bulb is only about 5% efficient, they are better as heating elements than as lights.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:30, Reply)
But the 25W ones (which give out about as much light as a 100W filament bulb) are rather expensive.
Anyway, I think LEDs are the future of lighting. CFLs should only be a stopgap for the next few years.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:33, Reply)
of the halogen bulbs I have in my living room, which I haven't tried yet, but if they work it'll be excellent, they must use bugger all power.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:34, Reply)
and they are directional light sources, so they're not ideal for ceiling lights etc at the moment. But once the technological problems of heat dissipation and longevity of large single-die LEDs have been solved, they'll be the dog's bollocks.
Dimmable, available in lots of colours, more efficient than CFLs and they come on instantly.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:36, Reply)
There are two main ways of making 'white' LEDs.
The first is to combine multiple dies into one device, each emitting a different colour. So you would have a red, green and blue trio in a single enclosure, and by careful selection of the relative outputs of each, to the human eye the output is white light.
The other way is to use an ultraviolet, or at least deep blue, LED, and coat the inside of the enclosure with phosphors which will fluoresce and emit (usually) yellow light. Normally, the phosphor coating is applied sufficiently thinly as to allow some blue light through, so the blue-yellow mixture gives a whitish light.
With both types though, the colour rendering index is poor, due to the single spectral lines which are used, rather than the continuous spectrum of a tungsten filament lamp. This can be improved though by the use of more colours in a multiple-die device, or a range of phosphors in a fluorescent type.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:45, Reply)
thanks
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:48, Reply)
We are looking at LEDs for the office, and have seen ones with differnt white colours.
I think the phosphor variant will be cheaper but the phosphor will probably wear over time, and change colour.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:52, Reply)
due to research into CRT technology (which unfortunately became obsolete around the same time as the technology reached a highly advanced stage!). So they're less likely to change over time as they were say 20 years ago.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:56, Reply)
For example:
this press release details a new product to be launched this autumn.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:59, Reply)
It may be you building up the charge, not the car.
Try tying a dog chain round your ankle and let it trail along the ground. Or stand in a bucket of water just before you leave the house.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:35, Reply)
But I thought that was because I look so hot in lycra.
(, Wed 14 Apr 2010, 12:39, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »