b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 697275 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm looking forward to the religious viewpoint

because obviously a belief in a ancient mythical being gives someone the abilty to make a reasoned argument regarding a scienticic practice.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:15, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Opinions like that are counter productive.
Religious people don't deserve to be mocked for their beliefs, and they have a right to comment on social issues.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:19, Reply)
Yes they bloody do deserve to be mocked.
In the same way people are mocked for believing in fairies.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:21, Reply)
"You have a different view to me, and so I shall mock you."

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:22, Reply)
Yeah, that's about the size of it.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:23, Reply)
I hope that on the Leader's debate tonight, Nick Clegg says to Gordon Brown:
I MOCK YOU FOR WE HAVE DIFFERENT FISCAL POLICIES!
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:24, Reply)
that would be super-awesome

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:28, Reply)
I would love it if he turned to Brown
and said, Got a problem you'd like to take outside?

And then to demonstrate, he karate chopped Cameron in the windpipe before walking back to his podium and saying "yeah, thought not, you cunt"
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:30, Reply)
I'd love to see that
as it would really help make up my mind who to vote for.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:31, Reply)
The way they all have to shake hands at the end is quite funny.
I want to know who will go first, or will there be an embaressing moment when Brown reaches for Clegg only to be intercepted by Cameron, who then worrys if he looks a bit gay by touching another man.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:36, Reply)
Haha
think it was in the House of Commons the other month, Cameron suggested Brown and Darling were gay. It was such a childish insult
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:45, Reply)
Fiscal policies are at least based on reasoned mathematics and polictcal agenda designed to do what the party believes is best for the population*
not a fictional character.

*and their own party
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
Not a view.
A fact.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:25, Reply)
But can't you see that people don't deserve to be mocked because of what they believe?
I am an atheist, but I would never mock someone because they choose to believe in God. It's idiotic.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:27, Reply)
Of course they deserve to be mocked

Christians, Muslims, environmentalists, socilaist, facists, fatties, /talkers, cats etc everyone deserves to be mocked.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:30, Reply)
You've all gone mad!!!!!
Mocking is what we do.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
Saying "it's a fact"
when it isn't is just as bad as saying "It's God's word"
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:30, Reply)
So you are saying that you think there may be a God?

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
No, I don't believe in God,
I have no need for God or Religion in my life. I just think the trend of dismissive retaliation against the religious right is stupid and pointless. Let them say what they want about evolution/genetics/politics and society. It doesn't mean that we should mock the religious or dismiss their opinions and concerns because they believe in God.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:41, Reply)
But using their religion
as a basis for any objection is the same as basing an objection on the fact that aliens don't like it, and I know, one came to me in a dream and I wrote it in a book and other people agree with me. It's no basis for an argument.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:44, Reply)
But they don't just say it do they.
They try to get us to see things the way they do. They try to get us to live the way they do. They fight wars about it and people suffer because of it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:51, Reply)
What the fuck? I've never forced my view on anyone.
I've got a better argument for saying you try to force your view on me (and do so), because you elected a goverment that has laws of which I am forced to abide.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:02, Reply)
Law and religion are two different things.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:04, Reply)
yeah, law is the law
so we have to obey or face the consequences. Not the case with religion. Not here at least.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:05, Reply)
I don't like the Queen
Any ideas on how to get rid of her?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:07, Reply)
Strap dynamite to one of the Corgis.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:14, Reply)
I think I should clarify
Legally.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:17, Reply)
Fuck off, you dirty forrin coming over here stealing our jobs
and now you want rid of our queen. Well it's not on you here, it's not on at all.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:15, Reply)
I don't like the Spanish King, if that helps
I don't think someone should rule my life only because one of his/her ancestors killed more people than anyone else.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:18, Reply)
Well go over there and depose him
but you can leave Liz alone.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:20, Reply)
Yeah, well...
That would be ilegal. I'm trying to find out how to change the fact that someone I didn't chose governs my life without doing anything ilegal. Can you help?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:25, Reply)
The Queen doesn't govern your life
She is only a ceremonial figurehead. A she draws in HUGE numbers of forrins to look at her house and stuff, so she brings a lot of cash into the economy.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:35, Reply)
She's one miserable old cunt though isn't she

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:37, Reply)
also, she was elected by God
who are we to argue?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:37, Reply)
Oh, yes
I forgot she's the head of your Church, as well. Good way of creating a new religion, killing a wife.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:41, Reply)
She can decide to dissolve the goverment when she fancies
and she can rule out laws.

The fact that she doesn't use her power doesn't mean she doesn't have it.

She gets quite a lot of money as a salary, and the only reason she got the job is because someone on her family killed someone else.

And she gets a lot of money from people visiting the palace and all that. She keeps that money, too. It doesn't go to you. And the same people would go to see the palace even if it wasn't a queen there anymore.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:39, Reply)
No, she can't dissolve the government
that is ridiculous scaremongering. If she attempted to dissolved the government the first thing that would happen would be that the monarchy would be deposed quicker than you can blink.

It may be written in an old lawbook that she can technically use those powers, but the reality of the situation is that she can't.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:42, Reply)
OMG u pure luv da Queen

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:43, Reply)
No, the reality of the situation is that she wouldn't
Because she'd be deposed. But she can.

You don't know how things will be in a few years, and someone who you didn't choose at all has a lot of power in her hands.

My point is that you seem not to be too bother about it all. You don't think you're daft for having a goverment like that.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:46, Reply)
actually legally
it is understood that the Queen cannot choose not to sign a law into existence
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:42, Reply)
I don't know everything about English laws
So, what would happen if she didn't want to sign a new law?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:57, Reply)
She doesn't have a choice.
She is just a ceremonial figurehead for the government. The "powers" that she has are just a leftover way of letting the monarchy remain and save a bit of face while being effectively made useless as heads of state.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:01, Reply)
So, in the case that
things in the country are getting messy, people is very unhappy, there is a big crisis (not like this one, a proper one) and she decides not to sign a law or dissolve the goverment, do you think nobody would follow her? Do you think it wouldn't start a civil war, as it's happened in so many places? Who is she and why her?

Besides, I think it's unfair that she gets paid for being the daughter of her father.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:05, Reply)
Well you can think it's as unfair as you like
but you're deliberately coming up with doomsday scenarios like a tinfoil hat wearing weirdo. If you really hate it, can I suggest moving to a country where she isn't the head of state. It's a bit odd getting worked up about a ceremonial figurehead when we have quite blatent problems with corruption in the actual government which need to be addressed long before you get into the Monarchy/Republic debate.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:08, Reply)
^ this
if you don't like it, you don't have to live here. I'm not even a monarchist and I still think it's important to keep them. She has no actual power, and I'd be much more worried about the corrupt MPs who actually govern us
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:12, Reply)
So my point is proven
You have to live in another country if you don't want to serve the Queen. Fair enough. In that case, you are not choosing your goverment, you see?

(I don't mind the Queen, I was trying to prove BGB and Al wrong)
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:15, Reply)
But the queen is not the governement
you are wrong in that assertion.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:18, Reply)
She's the head of your goverment
and the head of your church.

Legally, she has those powers.

Anyway, it's not important. We could be discussing about this all day. We both think we're right, so at least we agree there.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:20, Reply)
We might both think we are right
but the difference is that you are in fact wrong.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:23, Reply)
We might both think we are right
but the difference is that you are in fact wrong.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:31, Reply)
Don't take it so badly
It all comes from BGB saying that at least we can choose our goverment, and I don't think it's true.

Personally I have no problems with her, and if most people is happy with the system, that's perfect. The problem is that there is no way to prove that people is happy with the system, because you're never asked about it.

I could say that having such a devotion for just a person, who is well known and rich thanks to centuries of blood, is more than a bit daft, but ey, I'm not here to judge anyone.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:13, Reply)
I don't have a particular devotion to the queen
this started off as a joke comment about you coming form Spain and criticising our head of state, but you then started saying she was in some way the most powerful figure in the government, and that is simply not true in the real world.

And finally, at least the queen actually exists and evidence of her existence can be presented.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:17, Reply)
Yep
I could still think it's daft to serve her, couldn't I?

And you don't get to choose your goverment.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:18, Reply)
we don't serve her
and we have a democratic system where a government is elected
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:20, Reply)
Again
She's the head of the goverment and the church. She represents you in front of the rest of the world.

Otherwise, why are you paying her? What are her duties?

As I just said to Al, we'll never agree.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:22, Reply)
We won't agree because you won't accept the fact
that your argument is incorrect. We can choose our government, you may have noticed a lot of coverage of an upcoming election. That's how we choose our government. That's the reality. The queen may be the head of state, but it is a purely ceremonial role.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:25, Reply)
You want to keep talking?
OK, what (or which, I'm not sure) are the Queen duties?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:32, Reply)
"There she is...
in her cart."
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:34, Reply)
Hahaha!
Very good! I was drinking water and almost went to the keyboard!
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:37, Reply)
I aim to please :)

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:38, Reply)
Good job
You've earned your salary today!
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:41, Reply)
*waves slowly*
There's a few more thousand right there ^
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:42, Reply)
You'd be an excellent Queen
Pity nobody in your family killed enough people.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:46, Reply)
I'm too cheerful
She looks like she's sat in some mash
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:47, Reply)
That'd be an improvent, then
And I could visit you and we could have tea for hours.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:48, Reply)
You're saying that the religious are trying to get you to live the way they do, you're acting like the religion is forcing you into war.
I would say it's the people in power who are forcing the people to go to wars and suffer, and sometimes they do it in the name of religion. Not a single religion advocates the atrocities done it's name, it's the corruption of the religion that leads to such things. If I killed a family and told the world I did it in your name, would you just accept that, and accept responsibility for that? Exactly, so why should religion do the same?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:10, Reply)
I don't know which planet you're living on.
It must be nice there.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:15, Reply)
The Crusades
are not my period of history. But having brushed over them I can assure you there were a myriad of different reasons for people embarking upon them
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:16, Reply)
Well
I've grown up in a Catholic country, and since before I can remember, went to Church, went to a Catholic school and had to pray to God at least 5 times a day.

However, I was never asked to go to war. And I never tried to convince anyone to join the club.

Sorry about your bad experiences. It must have been painful for you to feel so bad about it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:21, Reply)
What atrocities have religion advocated?
Personally, I agree, state over religion, any day of the week, but I don't say religion should be dismissed as a cause of war. In fact, I'd say religion is quite against that sort of thing.

Mankind will always find ways of grouping and fighting with itself. There are people who just want to fight, both for reasons of creating a bond with their fellow fighters/football team/country/whatever, and just simply for narcersectic reasons.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:22, Reply)
Not all
Most people just want to go on with their lifes and be as happy as possible.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:04, Reply)
Nice usage of the word 'they' there
Most Christians couldn't give a flying fuck what other people do with their lives. And wars? Like to give me an example of a Christian war please? And try something other than the Crusades.

Edit: what I'm trying to say is just let people live their lives. If they want to believe in something that comforts them, let them have that. If they offend your sensibilities then never talk to anyone with a different viewpoint to you. You'll miss out on a lot of life
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:05, Reply)
I respect the right for you to believe in that nonsence if you respect my right to think you're as daft as a brush for believing in it.
It doesn't offend me. It makes me laugh.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:19, Reply)
The difference there is
that I'm not insulting you.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:22, Reply)
I have done nothing to be insulted for.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:27, Reply)
refer you to my post below
I know plenty of educated and quite fiendishly intelligent people who believe in God. Most of them are generally incredibly lovely people as well. Calling them daft as a brush and choosing to not associate with them makes you the poorer.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:29, Reply)
Really
If I wanted to be closed minded I could probably find a thousand reasons to call you daft. I don't think that's the right way to act.

Personally, I don't think I'm daft at all. And if you think you are so superior as to call people like Einstein daft, then maybe you've done something to be insulted for.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:29, Reply)
For the purposes of this discussion, is 'they' people who believe in a god
or is it people who follow an organised religion?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:20, Reply)
THe latter.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:27, Reply)
Cool
But a lot of the latter, even they don't preach or force it at anyone else.
Anyone who gets on with it should be allowed to get on with it.
*thinks of lovely nannas who don't think bad things about anyone but know that the Pope is a cunt*
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:30, Reply)
Why only the ones following an organized religion?
I thought you compared people who believe in God with people who believe in fairies. What is the difference if you aren't part of an organized religion? Could you clarify? I thought your whole point was that we're daft for having magic friends.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:33, Reply)
You're an idiot.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:25, Reply)
I'm an idiot for thinking people who believe in God are idiots.
So be it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:26, Reply)
Having a single minded point of view that makes you look down on other people is idiotic.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:26, Reply)
I'm with Pyschochomp
and DiT on this one. You can disagree with someone, but mocking them for believing in something different is just counterproductive and narrowminded
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
If they are demonstrably wrong in their belief
and they are, then the fact they continue to believe it means they must be very stupid, and consequently worthy of my mockery.

Plus they all love nonces and shit like that.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:31, Reply)
Please demonstrate to me that God doesn't exist.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:33, Reply)
Trolly trolly troll

But the answer to that is, you are claiming the existence of something, it's down to you to prove it. Or provide at least the slimmest piece of evidence for your argument. Obviously I don't mean you personally, since you don't actually agree with the argument you're making, you're just trolling BGB. And I'm experiencing OUTRAGE AND DISGUST on the internet now.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:35, Reply)
It's effectively impossible to prove something doesn't exist

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:36, Reply)
And equally effectively impossible to prove that something that doesn't exist exists.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
Yes, but some people *like* a priest up them.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:33, Reply)
Really, you can prove God doesn't exist?
Then, why aren't you on TV and all the newspapers, with those amazing news?

Go on, you could be rich now!
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:34, Reply)
Yawn.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:35, Reply)
I don't look down on them.
I just think they're daft for believing in such a thing.


Are you saying I should hedge my bets and start going to church just in case?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
No
Just don't judge people.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:35, Reply)
What a ridiculous statement
you judge every single person you have ever interacted with. It's an unavoidable thing to do.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
I judged you the first time I met you.
Judged you on your face.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
I think we have a problem with the translation
I don't mean judge like in form an opinion about someone, but judge like in sentencing that someone is wrong.

Let's people believe what they want, rather than impossing what we think it's right. Otherwise, you're just acting like the Catholic Church.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:42, Reply)
Al frequently acts like the catholic church

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:44, Reply)
All too true,
his shed is FULL of the paedos he's been hiding.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:54, Reply)
Wearing dresses and bumming?

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:55, Reply)
He'll soon be killing people for not believing what he believes
That reminds me of the Spanish Inquisition.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:57, Reply)
I know you are a believer.
It doesn't make me like you any less.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
I know
You only think I'm daft. I don't mind much, I'm quite naive most of the time.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:43, Reply)
Of course not
I'd just point out that some of the most intellectual and cleverest people I've met have believed in God. Not just little old ladies beating their chests in church, but people who know their stuff. And calling them daft seems a bit silly to me
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
I'd say you should start worshipping Gog, BGB.
He appeared to me in a dream. I now need money for a new house and a Lamborghini to spread the word of Gog.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
Awww, you massive victim you !

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:04, Reply)
Asuming that I should live by the same code of morals that they do

when they are based on something I find to be laudable equates to me that their opinions are not relevant.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:26, Reply)
We do generally live by the same code of morals,
religion was intergral to the development of a moral code. Without organised religion we would have a very different view on the value of human life.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:28, Reply)
It may have been intergral in the past when we all believed the flippin earth was flat but now we are fully aware how stupid the concept of a divine being is.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:36, Reply)
people didn't really think the world was flat.
at least not anywhere near as much as it is bandied about.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
Many people believed that the world was in fact a rhombus, true fact*

*true fact may not be true
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
people
didn't really have the time or the interest to ponder on whether the earth was flat. Your average peasant's world was bounded by his master's land, the concept of oceans and foreign countries was pretty much meaningless to them let alone whether the world was flat
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:40, Reply)
the people who did think about it didn't think it was flat either

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:41, Reply)
Yeah
that's true. The Greeks knew it
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:43, Reply)
as did Arab astronomers of the same period.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:29, Reply)
[citation needed]

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
psst
laudable
–adjective
1.
deserving praise; praiseworthy; commendable: Reorganizing the files was a laudable idea.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
cock

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:36, Reply)
And I have the right to respond scornfully.
They in turn are welcome to mock me for my scornfulness. This will be met with a kind of mutant super-scorn that will have evolved from my initial scorn.

SCORN.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:28, Reply)
I enjoyed discussing with the nuns at school
They would say that we can't use condoms, or play with human eggs, or abort because that would be going against Gog's plans.

I used to replay with 3 questions:

1.- Then, why do you allow ill people to go to the doctor, if God's plan is for them to be sick and die?

2.- Don't you think that God, being so powerful and all that, has already count on his plan that we were going to be doing these things?

3.- How does God's plan go with all the wars and killings approved by the Church?

They would reply as the politics and answer with non related bullshit.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:20, Reply)
Gog's plans are there for the good of you.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:21, Reply)
I love Gog, he's the best.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:23, Reply)
Mmm, that's some good Gog worship right there.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:25, Reply)
I don't believe in Gog.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:26, Reply)
I would talk to you, but you have a different view to me and I look down on you because of that.
I like to close my mind to opinions that differ from my own, and think that people who are not in agreement with me are fools.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:28, Reply)
I think I might mock you now.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
OH GOG NO!

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
You are OGGY OGBOURNE!

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:33, Reply)
POTD

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:30, Reply)
Haha!
I'm sure he/she only plans the best for me.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
you should have said
"what about priests fucking little children? is that God's plan too?"
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:27, Reply)
No.
But Gog is all for it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:28, Reply)
that Gog
he's such a character
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
I was an athiest
but I've seen the light. The light of Gog!
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
He's a randy bugger I'll tell you.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
I sa wthe light of Gog, he shone it all over my face

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
yeah
the fleshlight of Gog
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
It comes in boy anus, boy mouth and bitch tit varieties

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:39, Reply)
*backs slowly away from this avenue of conversation*

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:45, Reply)

away from this avenue of conversation onto NakedApe
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:52, Reply)

low mug
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:52, Reply)
I hate you

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:55, Reply)

hate you want a croissant
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:00, Reply)
He's had ten already today.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:01, Reply)
I haven't had a croissant for ages

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:04, Reply)
Hello you

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:06, Reply)
Oh you bloody pest.
Fucking one pound fucking nineteen.
This had better be worth it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:09, Reply)
I'm going to complain to the postal ombusdsman
I hope the fucks them RIGHT up the arse. But more realistically they will shrug and make a non committal grunting noise. The cunts.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:14, Reply)
I can't get it until Monday :(

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:17, Reply)
Oh boo.
It's worth the wait I promise.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:19, Reply)
I shall hardly sleep all weekend!

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:20, Reply)
That's because you'll be getting bummed
and having your norks jizzed on.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:23, Reply)
:D

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:27, Reply)
You started it

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:00, Reply)
I'm going to have to edit it
Don't you think? Before everybody makes fun of me :_(
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
I think they might have noticed... ;)
Besides, Gog has already seen it.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:40, Reply)
Too late then
I hope Gog choses my as High Priest(es?? Female)
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:45, Reply)
We had those types of discussions too
They would all be answered with "Yeah, right, but there are so many priests doing good things, why should we think about the ones who are bad?"
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
that sort of attitude is awful
"there have always been plenty of humans doing good things, so why should we stop Hitler and the Nazis??"
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:34, Reply)
I know
They once compare having sex with my boyfriend before getting married with having sex with an uncle. I still don't understand the simil there.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
those nuns were crazy
like the Pope.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
There were tons more of funny things
Like, you should your boyfriend have sex with however he wants, because as far as he doesn't do it with you, he'll marry you.

I don't know if I want to marry that bastard, you see? Not after he's fucked everybody else.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:46, Reply)
The nuns were from /talk.
Knowing you'd end up on /qotw, they were getting the unclefucker accusation in early.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:41, Reply)
Why should we? They're fucking smart.

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 15:31, Reply)
Al makes my mum shout about Gog in the shed

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
She does have a lot to say on the subject of Gog it's true

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:33, Reply)

does have a lot to say on the subject of does not have a oa +reflex,
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:36, Reply)
And what's in the cat is in the kitten ;)

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:37, Reply)
sauce!
*spanks*
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:38, Reply)
*squeals*
¬_¬
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:43, Reply)
right then
I'm off to the previous thread to resume groping with TGB
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:46, Reply)
She'll lead you on a fool's errand
and she has a gag reflex.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:47, Reply)
Really?
I could never quite make it fit.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:42, Reply)
ur a peedo to kittens

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:43, Reply)
It's worse than that,
I'm a wannabe.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:50, Reply)
I just pictured a kitten singing "If you wanna be my lover, you gotta get with my friends!"
and it was dressed as Geri, not Emma.
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:57, Reply)
in a tiny Union Jack dress?

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:59, Reply)
Yes
And a ginger wig with a blonde stripe
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 13:59, Reply)
Now I have that mental image
it would definitely be a better singer
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:01, Reply)
Poor Geraldine

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:02, Reply)
HAWT

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:04, Reply)
She also has a prosthetic nose

(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:05, Reply)
you stay away from that kitten!
Won't somebody call the Daily Mail?
(, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 14:07, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1