Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Human beings are massively overrated.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:21, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
What do you get if you whack someone on the head in an unprovoked attack, causing them to crack their skull and die of their injuries three days later?
I don't know your honour, what do you get if you whack someone on the head in an unprovoked attack, causing them to crack their skull and die of their injuries three days later?
Two and a half years! Boom! Boom!
eyethangyew.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:29, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:49, Reply)
I'm going to give my children ghetto names. "HEY! Chardonnay! Krystal! Alopecia! Rwanda! Get yo' black ass over her this instant!"
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:53, Reply)
she is the biggest tart.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:54, Reply)
pleading guilty makes a big difference.
Plus this wasn't just any book this is a piece of english history that was stolen from a University.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:27, Reply)
anyone living in housing made from the stone taken from Hadrian's Wall should be publicly flogged for their complicitness in the desecration of a scheduled ancient monument.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:32, Reply)
EDIT: Well...correct apart from 'complicitness' which you KNOW you just made up. Complicity, dear boy, complicity.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:35, Reply)
I'm multitasking and everyone knows blokes can't multitask.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:43, Reply)
That guy wasn't just any guy. I'm sure his life was more valuable than any book. You really can't put a book above someone's life.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:38, Reply)
property is valued above human life, acocrding to some ex copper on the radio this morning.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:40, Reply)
There's something wrong with us and our laws, if we can't change something so obviously wrong.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:47, Reply)
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:47, Reply)
There is only of that one, that exactly, that only book.
There was one of that exactly, that only human being. There are not even copies of him anymore.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)
Only 1000 were ever printed, and only between 230-240 still exist - and each one is individual from the next, which is how they proved that the book that was stolen was the one from Durham.
I'm not saying that a book is worth more than a life, far from it, by the way, but I am saying that the sentence given to the man for defacing a part of British (and literary) history for personal gain is bang on.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:22, Reply)
'Jobless mum-of-eight Theresa Bystram, 45, and her three teenage sons' for that book. No question.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:46, Reply)
That some Downs Syndrome kid had defaced with crayon.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)
for a decent ham sandwich right about now, but I seriously doubt their collective worth is sufficiently high
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)
I'd trade her life for any of the books in my collection.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)
But I would make he read it all out loud, before letting her drop.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:49, Reply)
maybe start with the Hungry Caterpillar instead
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:50, Reply)
I'll hook the trap door to a computer already programmed with the complete works, and if she stops reciting or makes a mistake, the computer trips the trap door, and then sends me an E-mail.
I can be at home with my feet up watching Dave or having a wank while I wait.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:54, Reply)
So of course they value books more highly than humans.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:42, Reply)
You have to be retard to value a book, any book, above a life.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:49, Reply)
Three books in fact.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:56, Reply)
if you have 2.
I have more books than friends myself, but then I love reading.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:59, Reply)
The defendant pleaded guilty, then changed it to not guilty on the day of sentencing, then at the rescheduled trial (4 months later, and after Christmas), pleaded guilty again. Due to wasting the court's time, he was given a jail sentence and a fine, but he argued that his wife had terminal cancer, and he was her only carer, so the sentence was suspended, and his fine wavered...
Still, his lawyer would have cost him a packet, plus he's on the register now.
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:39, Reply)
It all hinges on potential in my opinion
(, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 11:26, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread