
Chthonic confesses: "Only last year did I discover why the lids of things in tubes have a recessed pointy bit built into them." Tell us about the facepalm moment when you realised you were doing something wrong.
( , Thu 15 Jul 2010, 13:23)
« Go Back

the apostrophe denotes the contraction of the full word photographs to photo's
It's a common mistake to think the ' is rogue
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 20:02, closed)

if it's not the plural of photo and is the contraction of photographs...
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 21:46, closed)

I see three possibilities...
1) "Photo's" is a contraction, in which case the aposrophe is correct
2) "Photo's" is the plural of the abbreviation "photo", in which case the apostrophe is correct
3) bollocks, "photo" is used often enough to be considered a word in its own right, and the correct pluralisation is therefore "photos".
Dictionaries seem to go with the latter, but I reckon there's an argument to be made for any of the above.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 22:07, closed)

You don't use an apostrophe to denote a plural. Is this a pedantry trap?
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 15:01, closed)

you can, in fact, use an apostrophe when pluralising an abbreviation. Otherwise, you're quite right - it's a horrible habit for which a special circle in hell is rightfully reserved.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 20:41, closed)

Damned punctuation cropping up and not cropping up.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 22:19, closed)

an apostrophe in front of 'bus but I doubt anyone else does any more.
I recall being taught this as I asked the teacher what 'bus was short for but she didn't know. All she knew was it should have a apostrophe in front of it.
( , Tue 20 Jul 2010, 23:12, closed)

means 'for all'.
Because a bus isn't just for the driver.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 8:18, closed)

But I suspect if I started to put an apostrophe infront phone, photo and fridge then I would just get looked at funny.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 20:21, closed)

And contractions are a matter of style and 'photo's' grates on me. Greengrocer's, innit?
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 0:09, closed)

Edit: Hold on. I think you only use an apostrophe for a contraction if the missing letters are in the middle of the word. I've never seen photo' or pro' as the singular for photograph or professional, so you wouldn't add one to make a plural I don't think. It'd be interesting to find a proper source which states it either way though.
"Strawberry's" is a better example of one that I see a lot.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 15:40, closed)

'photo' and 'pro' are not contractions - they're abbreviations. Different rules. Abbreviations can use the apostrophe when made plural.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 20:51, closed)

Mr Quayle, how nice to see you here. Have you been busy since you left the vice presidency?
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 5:59, closed)

No-one says they play the 'cello any more, but some people still talk about catching the 'flu.
Gone are the days of the talented bo's'n playing the 'cello and the piano' on the fo'c's'le.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 9:41, closed)

On the one hand, "photo's" seems appropriate if it's a contraction.
On the other hand, "photos" seems to be common usage as photo is now a word in its own right.
On the gripping hand, PHOTOGRAPHS STEAL YOUR SOUL.
( , Wed 21 Jul 2010, 13:19, closed)
« Go Back