b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6163454

Bloddy DLR!!!
charming this weekend when i need to go down to London docklands, they decide to have construction on the tracks to improve it

...pricks

thankfully there's gonna be a shuttle service, but talk about annoying
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:19, archived)
Yeah, CUNTS
How DARE they improve their infrastructure! ESPECIALLY when you want to use it! The outrage. I'd write to your local paper if I were you.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:21, archived)
Although you've probably missed this what with the whole Paris thing
but they've stopped calling it "Engineering Works" and now call it "Planned Improvements" as if changing the words makes it better that they are fucking up your day.

Here's a thought for the 3am beardy-stroking meeting marketing cuntpuffins that charged half-a-million quid for the "slogan image change concept" - if you'd PLANNED, you wouldn't need fucking IMPROVEMENTS, would you now?
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:38, archived)
Can I rant about the fact the Victoria Line is going on strike from 9pm for 24 hours?

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:41, archived)
Fuck, yeah.
Paid 40 grand a year for a 35 hour week, 50 days holiday a year and they aren't allowed to work for more than an hour and a half without a break and they're STILL striking?

If I was still in London I'd hunt the cunts down and disembowel them with the blunt spoon.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:43, archived)
I'm in London, but I only have a plastic teaspoon.
It could take some time...
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:45, archived)
the longer the better
make them suffer.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
*heads over to Euston*

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
From what I can gather, they're striking now because someone was sacked because
he breached safety procedures. He opened the doors on the wrong side of the tube, then denied making a mistake when he was in his disciplinary. Apparently this is all revolving aruond safety issues. I get the Victoria line every day, and have seen no problems. If it was that unsafe, they'd do some "planned improvement" and sort it out.

I might go on strike just for the fun of it. Seems the thing to do.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:50, archived)
Oh jesus christ
Everybody makes mistakes. Quite frankly, if you jumped off the tube when all you could see in front of you was wall, then maybe you shouldn't be using it unattended
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:53, archived)
Picturing this is making me chuckle.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:55, archived)
It won't just be that.
That'll be his final thing. You need 5 or 6 major disciplinary errors to even get close to sacking on LU

in any case, I suspect the issue here isn't the error (which anyone could do, although given the Viccy line is semi-auto that's ALL he has to fucking do) but that he lied about it. Deserves all he fucking gets. Own up to your mistakes. Fucking coward.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 12:11, archived)
Ah so it's a rebranded 'shit the track is bent, get a hammer Geoff' instead of proper improvements
I feel slightly bad about shouting at smathels now. Sorry smathels.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:42, archived)
On the DLR it's probably something to do with the Olympics as it goes.
but, yeah, you've got the general gist.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:46, archived)
lol alls forgiven ;
Now...follow the path of righteousness
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:50, archived)
annoying - a word used to signify that something has caused annoyance

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:21, archived)
I don't want to talk about annoying.
I want to talk about The Apprentice.

I'm more than a little excited about it tonight. I hope Howard gets to be PM and that someone physically hurts Debra.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:21, archived)
I watched in last week for the first time
I will not be doing it again. What a shower of bellends all those people are.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:23, archived)
they're using reality tv to pick prime ministers now?

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:23, archived)
I've still never watched it.
I think this is a result for me. I normally go out of my way to watch TV shows that annoy me.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:34, archived)
It's not a patch on Super Sweet Sixteen, but still quite good.
I am an armchair business expert. Think there's a career in that?
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:35, archived)
I'd like to think so.
I'm an armchair idle sweary bastard. Think there's a career in that?
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:36, archived)
Butbutbut .... Fran
they're all fucktards. not one contestant on that has ever actually done anything prior to going on, or had any real ability, because otherwise they'd have been able to get where they wanted without going on that program. It's the business equivalent of X-factor. Except that it's OK to prostitute the media because that's essentially how the media works. It's not really very clever to do it in an actual business environment. Things tend to go to shit very rapidly.

We shouldn't be fucking encouraging this. We should be culling them for the general good.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:35, archived)
Yeah but it's got great music.
Alright fuckface?
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:37, archived)
not bad , there.
how's the world from a foot lower down and sexier?
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:39, archived)
Not bad.
Coping with OFFLINEDRAMA quite well. Things are looking up. As am I. Constantly.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:42, archived)
arf.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:44, archived)
Butbutbut .... Nik
I like fucktards and media prostitution and making people do things in an artificial environment that they wouldn't dream of doing elsewhere. It's why I also like Big Brother.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:38, archived)
I know, and that's fine
but this isn't an artifical enviroment in the end, the winner actually gets a job. And it's making people think that the qualites displayed by those sub-neanderthal IQ arsefezs are actually valued in a business environment.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:41, archived)
I don't understand why anyone would want to work for Sir Alan 'Em@iler' Sugar

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:35, archived)
Oh they started the construction work to interrupt your travel arrangements like I told them too?
Good, good, excellent, yes.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:23, archived)
it's all falling into place

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:23, archived)
*strokes fluffy white cat^

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:25, archived)
London?
Never heard of it.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:23, archived)
OH EM GEE!
Like, what're we gonna do? I hope that this doesn't disrupt my day. I don't know how I'm going to cope after hearing this news.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:27, archived)
*slaps*
for the love of god, woman. calm down!
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:27, archived)
*kicks you in the shins*

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:28, archived)
with your tiny feet, i wouldn't notice

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:29, archived)
:(

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:30, archived)
BWA HA HA
love you really, i'm going on lunch now
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:32, archived)
Use a car, hippy.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:35, archived)
Damn..i never thought of that
.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:38, archived)
Here to help.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:39, archived)
I am on the phone to Transport for London
They have written me a cheque for £9.42
for a claim for £20.00

I wonder how they reached their number.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:38, archived)
Hopefully they can tell me.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:39, archived)
Apparently my claim is made as a pro-rata claim against the cost of my original season ticket
not the cost of the tickets I bought to replace it.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:41, archived)
Maybe now they can tell me why I am not allowed to make a futher claim for a second ticket.
Their letter says I am entitled to 2 claims per year.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:42, archived)
Because some fucker would claim every day if they could
Places like Unilever get people writing in very often, for vouchers. If they allowed it, they'd go fucking bust.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
apparently becuase I left my card at home and wasn't able to return the same day
this counts as two claims.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:51, archived)
Tossers

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:54, archived)
At least they processed my claim quickly and had reasonably sensible answers.
I was misled by a lady that worked for South Eastern Trains.
Next time I will get my advice from Transport for London.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:56, archived)
"Dear Unilever,

This Cillit Bang when applied to my work surfaces does actually make a 'bang', I would like some compensation. Thank you."
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:54, archived)
'Dear Unilever
I applied Dove shower gel to my face and left it for 3 days, thinking it was face lotion. Now my face is red and crusty. I want compensation'


TRUE CASE
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:57, archived)
Send them an Anti-Spastic voucher

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 12:00, archived)
I'm the replacement service, hop on my back, I'll take you anywhere.
I got a number on my forehead.
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:46, archived)
I really really want this to be true.

(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
It IS true!
You can sit on the upper deck
(, Wed 20 May 2009, 11:51, archived)