![Challenge Entry: Lego [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
![](http://dodgy-downloads.co.uk/b3ta/lego-tat.jpg)
I loves Lego I do.
From the Lego challenge. See all 161 entries (closed)
( , Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:32, archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:34,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Specifically, Russian schoolgirl lesbians, being so for visual entertainment.
It doesn't get much better than that, people.
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:36,
archived)
It doesn't get much better than that, people.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Whodathunkit
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:57,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...but does anyone else get annoyed at Americans referring to lego as legos, e.g 'is there anything legos can't do?'?
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:34,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and the way they VERB EVERY FUCKING NOUN AND CUNTS IN MANAGEMENT IN THIS COUNTRY LATCH ONTO IT AND THEN THEIR SYCOPHANTIC SUBORDINATES MIMIC THEM AND SPEW THE SAME SHIT AND EVENTUALLY, NO MATTER HOW MUCH IT PAINS ME, I KNOW IT WILL BECOME THE ACCEPTED SPOKEN ENGLISH OF TOMORROW!!!!!11!1!11!1!11!!!one
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:46,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
At least the bbc have cottoned on to twenty-eleven now, it's only ITV that appear to still be saying two thousand and eleven... :(
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:48,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Damned Brits
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:56,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"Verb" is a noun.
Thus, you have just "verbed" a noun yourself.
If this was deliberate, subtle irony, it gets lost somewhat in the shoutiness.
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:51,
archived)
Thus, you have just "verbed" a noun yourself.
If this was deliberate, subtle irony, it gets lost somewhat in the shoutiness.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Not. Story goes that teh UV tattoo ink can supposedly kill you to death by cancer. Whether true or not, I wasnt about to risk it.
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:38,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
[edit]
its glow in the dark ink that's cancerous as it contains phosphorus, not the uv :)
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:46,
archived)
its glow in the dark ink that's cancerous as it contains phosphorus, not the uv :)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Bollocks. In which case I'll opt for UV when I get the entire works of Shakespeare done on my old chap.
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:51,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'd imagine there's a lost tribe with these markings somewhere
( ,
Fri 4 Mar 2011, 13:42,
archived)