
I want to see one where Milk wins. Or, even better, where there is no winner and they both just dance.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:16,
archived)

Your stuff is completely mental; long may you be here mate :)
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:00,
archived)

it did it on my friend's telly, but when i got home, it actually said hancock, despite also being Virgin
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:03,
archived)

Commoner!
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:07,
archived)

my mates have an HD telly. i don't see any difference with it, really
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:10,
archived)

To be honest you really need a 42" tv or bigger, some say 32, but the difference is negligible at that size unless you're sat on top of it. Antiques road-show always looks incredible.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:25,
archived)

i'd love a bigger one, but there's more important things that i need to buy and i can't afford those yet
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:38,
archived)

My tv is only a 32" but it's CRT (old big tube thing) it's 720p but the picture quality was a lot better on the few crt's that where made to display it.... that was until the LED tellys came out, they are really quite beautiful with the right source.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:41,
archived)

i had a bigger one, but it died.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:44,
archived)

I did get it repaired (power regulator kept going in it) but that has ended up in my bedroom as comparing the pictures the crt was a lot cleaner and more vibrant.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:57,
archived)

I still have a tube, but I think I may finally go HD during "Boxing Week" sales as I'm tired of all the widescreen TV signals being cut off on both sides of my screen.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:45,
archived)

(and I believe bang & olufsen) When I got this it was either 720p crt or 1080i plasma, and the price difference between the two was about 7 grand!
at the time most plasmas only had a 10000 hour life span, and for a TV worth 10k that's just stupid!
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:56,
archived)
at the time most plasmas only had a 10000 hour life span, and for a TV worth 10k that's just stupid!

i never could get comfortable watching telly lying down
( ,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 0:07,
archived)

at the time, it was the last CRT model on display, but all the low-def signals looked like shit on the more expensive LCD screens. But now everything is widescreen/HD and I'm an anachronism.
( ,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 0:22,
archived)

Unless it's that people with HD TVs can't stop talking about their TVs
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:26,
archived)

Discovery is a swine for upscaling.
Bbc hd always pumps out quality, The top gear polar special was stunning, even at 720p....
Our leap wasn't as big as the yanks, they raved about it because their old analogue system was dire, it looked like long play vhs.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:28,
archived)
Bbc hd always pumps out quality, The top gear polar special was stunning, even at 720p....
Our leap wasn't as big as the yanks, they raved about it because their old analogue system was dire, it looked like long play vhs.

Active looks better than passive, but the glasses are still quite pricey for active, My computer monitor is passive 3D, but has hdmi on it, some of the ps3 games look amazing, but you do find yourself bending over trying to peek around corners.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:47,
archived)

The passive ones you have to sit with your head straight to see the 3d effect.
I must admit though, I have a very slight turn in my right eye. (no it's not bozz) and without my glasses on they give me a head ache. (I have a prism that corrects the turn)
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:59,
archived)
I must admit though, I have a very slight turn in my right eye. (no it's not bozz) and without my glasses on they give me a head ache. (I have a prism that corrects the turn)

so i'm pretty much screwed umtil someone invents me a robotic eye
( ,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 0:05,
archived)

He shouted at me the other week for saying "cock up in price" infront of his 6 month old daughter!
The cunt.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:09,
archived)
The cunt.

And admit that we've got the Take That concert on. :-)
As a stage show, it is abso-flippin'-lutely astounding.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:16,
archived)
As a stage show, it is abso-flippin'-lutely astounding.

It is - IMHO - a pretty much unparalleled piece of staging, technically and sonically (yes, I went along with Mrs Skotzmun to the real thing).
And it's got a feckin' big robot... I mean... big robots fer gawd's sake!
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:22,
archived)
And it's got a feckin' big robot... I mean... big robots fer gawd's sake!

How does it fit into the show?
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:26,
archived)

It's the centrepiece for the Progress tour. I'd call a 40m tall robot as part of a stage show progress! :-)
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:34,
archived)

but i guess you have to take the bad with the good
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:36,
archived)

Although I don't mind the music, to be honest. I may have been indoctrinated by the missus, but my ears no longer bleed.
If you can stand it, switch over to BBC1 now (with the sound down) and you'll see the 40m robot in all it's upstanding glory.
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:38,
archived)
If you can stand it, switch over to BBC1 now (with the sound down) and you'll see the 40m robot in all it's upstanding glory.

I did like that film. I thought it was great, and totally didnt predict the change in direction halfway through
( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:06,
archived)

( ,
Sun 18 Dec 2011, 23:12,
archived)


I send it back to the kitchen.
( ,
Mon 19 Dec 2011, 0:24,
archived)