data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
To tell the truth, I've been racking my brains and can't think how '10 items or less' is ambiguous.
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:14,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
I don't see why I have to distinguish between large numbers of small things (less sugar) and small numbers of large things (fewer shoes). Why can't I use one term for both?
On the other hand, people better not be misusing "insure" and "ensure" around me... :)
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:20,
archived)
On the other hand, people better not be misusing "insure" and "ensure" around me... :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
foc's'ale? something like that. bring it on you pedants ;)
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:33,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
forward of the castle
edit: (although it could be fo'c'sl'e or f'o'c'sl'e - dunno)
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:37,
archived)
edit: (although it could be fo'c'sl'e or f'o'c'sl'e - dunno)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
ponder it a moment
then punch them in the face
"Nobody gives a fuck"
and get on with your life :)
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:22,
archived)
then punch them in the face
"Nobody gives a fuck"
and get on with your life :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
if you consider the sugar to be one flowing item, like a liquid. If you were referring to the individual sugar grains, you would use fewer.
I don't make the rules, I just have to slavishly insure that everybody else follows them ;)
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:23,
archived)
I don't make the rules, I just have to slavishly insure that everybody else follows them ;)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
I have a pile of sand (or sugar, I suppose but what the hell am I doing with a pile of sugar for fuck's sake?!) and I remove a grain from the top of the pile.
I continue to remove grains from the pile, one at a time; at what point does it stop being a pile of sand? When one grain is left? 10 grains? There is no real distinction between masses of things and groups of things.
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:27,
archived)
I continue to remove grains from the pile, one at a time; at what point does it stop being a pile of sand? When one grain is left? 10 grains? There is no real distinction between masses of things and groups of things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
Then it's just "smelly hair sand".
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:31,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
but there is a difference in everyday language.
If I ask a greengrocer for a bunch of grapes and he hands me a single grape, arguments about philosophy are not going to make me buy it.
[edit] On reflection, i think what you have identified is simply vague language, rather than any philosophical idea. A 'pile' of sand is a relative term which may mean something different to everyone, whereas 'ten tons of sand' is a specific value that there can be no doubt about.
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:32,
archived)
If I ask a greengrocer for a bunch of grapes and he hands me a single grape, arguments about philosophy are not going to make me buy it.
[edit] On reflection, i think what you have identified is simply vague language, rather than any philosophical idea. A 'pile' of sand is a relative term which may mean something different to everyone, whereas 'ten tons of sand' is a specific value that there can be no doubt about.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
It is not size dependant, you can have less of anything or fewer of anything.
Less sugar or fewer grains of sugar, fewer shoes or less shoe.
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:24,
archived)
Less sugar or fewer grains of sugar, fewer shoes or less shoe.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
so techinically I had less shoe
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:27,
archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="link to this post #"
"Use fewer to describe countable things. Use less to describe uncountable quantities, collective amounts, and degree. These terms are not interchangeable."
It is number dependant, not size-dependant. Or dependent. Whatever.
( ,
Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:31,
archived)
It is number dependant, not size-dependant. Or dependent. Whatever.