b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9084690 (Thread)

# I dunno what all the fuss is about!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:18, archived)
# I can fix it
for £400,000

:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:19, archived)
# The logo may have been more appropriate here:
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:38, archived)
# hahaha
THAT'S AN ENGLISH HOUSE IN WALES!

that's why it's on fire
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# Too fuckin right an' all butty
Echyn chwechyn
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:44, archived)
# hahah
DON'T BURN ME, BRO!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:45, archived)
# I thought you were saying that because it looks like the flag of St. David
Took me about 5 goes to get the burning cottage joke

/slow day
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# It's on fucking FIRE!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# Take 2 zeros off that and I'll do it
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:38, archived)
# I always said you were cheap!
Watched 30 rock yet loser?
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:43, archived)
# Yes
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:46, archived)
# Solid gold shoes lol!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:51, archived)
# There was a flim title with black in it, but I cant remember it, that made me lol
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:52, archived)
# thats the price for "rolling it out"
I would imagine that is creating a job for some one to travel to each depot and carpark ticket dispencer. change a sticker then its back to the dole :(.

or... perhaps its someone already employed by the council who will be paid for doing something different for 12 minuets thus the numbers skyrocket.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# DO people genuinely have nothing better to do
than complain nowdays?

I actually think that is quite a nice logo!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:19, archived)
# vicarious passive aggression
:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:20, archived)
# FUCK YOU!
I mean, I think you might be right ;)
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:22, archived)
# I'm going to write "fuck your piss" on a piece of paper
put it into an envelope

and then post it to you

:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:23, archived)
# Bring it on you fucknugget!
Knowing my postman, it will never arrive anyway ;)
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:29, archived)
# BOATS, MOTHERFUCKERS!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:37, archived)
# Ha ha ha!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# sometimes I think, how amusing would it be to print out a single or pair of words that form an abusive statement
and just send it out to random addresses

then I realise, such a thing is the domain of the mad
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:42, archived)
# Arf!
Then do it you loon :D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:45, archived)
# I'm not certain if it's legally arguable as the product of eccentricity or harrassment
:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:46, archived)
# Well I don't think it can be called harassment
if you do it randomly, and only once to each person.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:47, archived)
# nah, I'll let some other certifiable "artist" try this one I think
:)
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:48, archived)
# how can it be
if said person does not exist?
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:53, archived)
# pfft
gloryhole
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:42, archived)
# :D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:50, archived)
# It's better than the olympic one.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:20, archived)
# I hated the olympic one
until someone pointed out that it looks like a paraplegic falling off a multi storey carpark. LOL!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:21, archived)
# Hahahaha!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:22, archived)
# :D
I think it was Frankie Boyle.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:26, archived)
# No, it was definitely a multi-storey car park.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:36, archived)
# haha
LMLNLMGNLGNL*SPLAT*
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:24, archived)
# I think it's quite nice too.

Logos cost a lot to implement in all carriers. I guess people are mostly against change.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:28, archived)
# Yeah,
especially 1 and 2 pennies. They really annoy me!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:30, archived)
# I don't know what you're talking about

please explain it to the forrin peoples
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:33, archived)
# CHange as in change from a purchase,
1 and 2 pennies is change!

QED!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:35, archived)
# Ooof!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# i also like it
and can see why they've done it.

not as if they've spent a fortune on designing it like 2012, and the initial costs will be outweighed by the cheaper reproduction of this than the more complicated current model

anyway who cares, it's only bloody cornwall
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:45, archived)
# Pwitty fishy.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:19, archived)
# hmm I dont see don kings hair
unless perhaps it was set on fire.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:26, archived)
# I think 'Cornwall Council' is a pretty good name for Cornwall's council.
*EDIT* Silly old me. There's a graphical issue. Well, I'll leave that to you experts.

[I did like 'and a chough (a type of bird)', though]
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:26, archived)
# There's only about ten choughs there anyway
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:46, archived)
# choughing hell
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:23, archived)
# This is funny with no chance of retaliation
As we all know the internet hasn't reached Cornwall yet.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:27, archived)
# i fear for the day
Cornwall College National Training becomes a university...
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:29, archived)
# but... they have
an ongoing portfolio of work on professional development issues

This fills me with pride that people in high ranking positions can still make up meaningless bollocks to fill a space created by an ongoing need to impose an identity of meaningful representation in a morphemic progression.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:33, archived)
# Tell me about it.
I have to attend 3 weekend sessions this term with these utter nonsense merchants:
www.7d-culture.nl/main/index.php


"New solutions are required that are grounded in sharp strategy, understand the organization's values, reconcile the competing demands
of the perspectives of all stakeholders including shareholders, employees and customers, plus solid branding and impeccable design."

SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:39, archived)
# oh man
I am almost jealous. However I know deep down I would only last a week at most before they turn their handjibe turkey quotifications on me. and get me fired for blatently making up new bullshit phrases. Its a hobby
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:43, archived)
# We're going to play bullshit bingo next session
Everyone gets six words, such as "framing" or "crystalisation", and first to tick them all off gets a prize.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:46, archived)
# now that to me
sounds like a win win contingency arrangement. it should facilitate your brainstorming sessions by prestigisizing the throughput flow.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:56, archived)
# at the duration they should extend transparent infomediaries at the very least, turning the bangs to flashes and going blue sky for directing innovative B2C platforms
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:59, archived)
# *hemorrhages*
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:02, archived)
# it's joined up thinking at it's most obvious
:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:04, archived)
# not without first making steps for change
your overlooking the boundary stops put in place for good reason. Without proper performance monitors these steps you planning could over agitate the planning systems and create a workvortex.


but i know where your coming from and, I like
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:06, archived)
# that's why we'll implement a focus group to intermediarate the action plan into a line of sight without the necessity for refraction to rainbow the wide spectrum without the ambient propagation of short waving
fuck, now I need some coke
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:09, archived)
# ahh yep you got me
I got no where to go on this but yes land because your a go getter john (mind if i call you john?) yeah i can see a bright future in this plan *tails off* *drinks large whisky*
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:18, archived)
# no worries brian
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:28, archived)
# *slumps back in large chair*
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:34, archived)
# leveraging prior b2b relationships to accelerate positioning into the domain of facilitatively acceptable deliverables is no laughing matter
:D
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:47, archived)
# your right
I havent looked at that angle in oversizing my identity aspect it needs to be addressed and rest assured that no matter, the obstacles our destination is optimized to fit our planned goal limits. thus reducing fail bollards on the roadmap.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:00, archived)
# of course, there's obviously no point putting an off ramp into a dirt track unless you've got big wheels on the slow boil
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:06, archived)
# yes but you cant drive without a foundation of considerations
work for the goal of a group and your heading for a no mans land of ambiguity
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:15, archived)
# the tides gone out, the seagulls are hunting fish and we've got deeds to the nest, all their eggs are in the battery farm and now it's time to turn the mains on
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:34, archived)
# I want to see a chart on this
the chips are down and the mayo is on my ass. I need a fire in the cage to stop the seagulls getting lose. I know this is a time change but we need a go getting penguin to light that fire. truth be told John we need greese on the wheels or the whole cage is gonna come down bricks and all. none of the kings horses can get that fire out. gah the gin has fused my acronym circuits.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:44, archived)
# it's a midasian certainty with a crosshair right in the middle, snipe it hard and ring that bell!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:48, archived)
# ding ding
arg no it burns
I have all day tomorrow turns off tap
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 21:55, archived)
# now's a good time to get help from the online web economy bullshit generator
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:45, archived)
# Wow I love that
If only someone had told my course convenors about this site,
they could save themselves from spending thousands on this consultancy firm
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:47, archived)
# this things been about a few years
there's no doubt a few others out there
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# but we still keep posting meaningless bollocks, though.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:39, archived)
# arf!
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:34, archived)
# As a professional graphic designer I have to say I quite like the new logo
The old/existing one is crap
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:37, archived)
# It doesn't have an old one
It's a new organisation. The county council put the coat of arms on everything but it's not their logo
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:43, archived)
# i think their new logo is lovely
and the old one is cock
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# I am still enjoying watching this !
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:45, archived)
# That is a lovely, lovely thing.
(, Sun 11 Jan 2009, 20:55, archived)