b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9170957 (Thread)

# pope
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# You sir are starting to worry me
with your obsession over the pope :)

EDIT: Your username just reminded me of this,

www.imdb.com/title/tt1155076/
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# do i? do i?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# oh for fuck sake... Even with Jackie in it, CAN'T THESE HOLLYWOOD TYPES MAKE SOMETHING ORIGINAL, OR JUST FUCK OFF??!?!?!
remakes remakes remakes....

I've just recently seen teh pink panther adverts on TV. Christ almighty.. I swear hollywood is going to implode with all this sort of crap.

(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:45, archived)
# I saw that advert the other day.
I was so angry I almost smashed my tele!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# I watched 30 Rock
that someone off the internet sent me.....
OH NO I DIDN'T!!!!

;P
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# I apologise!
Your signature says most of it....
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:50, archived)
# Only messing.
Take your time,but hurry up.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:53, archived)
# I can't stand Steve Martin at the best of times, but I really want to smash his face in having seen that trailer.
Preferably using a baseball bat with nails in it. (yes, I was watching Escape from New York last night :D)
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:49, archived)
# He was very funny in 30 Rock.
*winds stanbo up*
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:51, archived)
# WELL I WOULDN'T FUCKING KNOW



(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:59, archived)
# I think there must just be some law which says all white haired comedians much eventually get shit later in their career.
Leslie Nielson went from Police Squad to Scream 3 for christ's sake.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:54, archived)
# hmmmm... that's actually quite a good point....
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:05, archived)
# Scary Movie 3
which is far worse than Scream 3
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:12, archived)
# That was precisely what I meant.
Proves how terrible a movie it was when I can only remember what it was a parody of.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:19, archived)
# if you want
to have all your anger bubble boil at once just look at this.

my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994:BlogPost:1000866
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:02, archived)
# Flash Gordon,
Westworld and Ihe Incredible Shrinking Man, could do with a modern make-over, as for the rest,leave 'em alone.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:08, archived)
# have toy SEEN the new flash gordon TV series? *shudders*
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:13, archived)
# It that what they meant!!
That was bad TV!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:14, archived)
# WHAT A BUNCH OF UTTER FUCKING CUNTS!
HOW FUCKING DARE THEY REMAKE ARTHUR AT ALL, LET ALONE WITH THAT TALENTLESS CUNT BRAND!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:09, archived)
# told you.
boil away.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:10, archived)
# THE TAKING OF PELHAM 123 WITH TRAVOLTA?
GET TO FUCK YOU CUNTS!

ALSO, THE BIRDS? DID NO-ONE REALISE YOU SHOULD NEVER REMAKE HITCHCOCK AFTER THAT ABOMINATION THAT WAS PSYCHO?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:10, archived)
# I had a magazine cutout of jane fonda as barbella.
Rose McGowan better be no relation to shane....
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:13, archived)
# I think she is the one who used to
go out with Marilyn Manson. I once saw her in a fucking terrible film, let me check out....

EDIT: www.imdb.com/title/tt0155776/ thats the film I saw her in. She is quite fit actually.

Also, she was Cherry in Planet Terror.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:14, archived)
# She was great in Grindhouse
very lovely-able
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:16, archived)
# well i mean she's not awful
nsfw

but she looks like someone I failed to get it off with, except fatter and with an undershot top jaw.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:17, archived)
# Nice dress.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:26, archived)
# They remade Pelham a coyuple of years back
They are even forgetting what they've remade noW!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:13, archived)
# Did they?
I missed that thank fuck!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:16, archived)
# straight to video
with the otherwise great Vincent D'onofrio
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:24, archived)
# And Lorraine Bracco by the look of things.
Which brings me back to a point I made the other day....

b3ta.com/board/9162482
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:32, archived)
# I don't know what to say to that....
I simply can't believe all those are being remade. I know a few of them aren't actaully happening (The Thing, thank the lord, isn't happening)
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:11, archived)
# Barbarella,
I am not sure about whether it is a good or a bad idea. In all honesty, as much as I love the original, it isn't exactly an amazing piece of cinema. I just hope that they have even more nudity than the original :D
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:13, archived)
# I thought The Thing
was going to be a prequel about the "Hey Sweden! They're Norweigans, Mac"
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:15, archived)
# have they run out of ideas?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:12, archived)
# No its just lazy
If enough people go to see a remake that it makes it's money back, then they go
"Hey, that remake made it's money back, let's do other remakes rather than risk money on an original idea"

PLEASE PEOPLE... STOP GIVING IN TO THEM. STOP PAYING TO WATCH SHIT REMAKES AND THEY WILL STOP MAKING THEM

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but I have to get it out...
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:17, archived)
# AND FUCKING ANGEL HEART?
ANGEL FUCKING HEART?

HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU EVER GONNA FUCKING WELL MATCH DE NIRO AND ROURKE?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:12, archived)
# that really pissed me off..........
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:15, archived)
# That is such a brilliant film!
Very very underrated in my opinion.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:17, archived)
# Unless all involved re-shoot it exactly the same!!



Mmmm..Bonet...
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:16, archived)
# Hell yeah!
That really groated my sprockets :D
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:20, archived)
# Yeah... worked for Psycho
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:25, archived)
# that sounds horrible
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:55, archived)
#

(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:11, archived)
# P-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-POPE WAGGON!!!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
#
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# hijole!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# Calle tu boca maracon!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
#
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:53, archived)
# toap
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Arf!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
#
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:49, archived)
# wagon?
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:55, archived)
# wagon? you mean a popemobile
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:57, archived)
# hehe thought I'd seen that before..

(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:07, archived)
# Why not put all your pope pics in one thread so you don't clog up the board for others
Hmm?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# reply
i dont kno how to
soz
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# easy
it's the same as posting a reply, just copy and paste the url cr3ation gives you instead of writing words, although additional words are nice too.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:45, archived)
# Especially if they involve the words "oiled" and "lesbians"
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# sometimes a picture is better than a thousand words
this being a very strong case for the rule
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:50, archived)
# click the my images tag
then select the image and cut and past the html into the reply box
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# what's the difference between a html and a url
apart from the obvious spelling differences, keep your reply very short and easy to understand
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# html: hyper text markup language ie: the code including <img> tags and so on
url: uniform resource locator, the actual place (no that's misleading sorry) it's a means of locating the data on internet...
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:53, archived)
# blimey, i even understand this
so i was wrong and you were right, i stand very happily corrected. thankyou.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:55, archived)
# no worries, but the terms are typically interchanged in common communication.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:00, archived)
# you can stop now
i'm bored with all this jargon talk already:)
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 14:02, archived)
# URL is a website/file address
HTML is a language that describes how a page should look to a browser

HTML can contain URLS
URLS do not contain HTML*

*usually

(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:54, archived)
# i don't care what the media say about you young people
you're all frightfully clever and very helpful.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:57, archived)
# Cor, Fanks Mista!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:58, archived)
# Oh, the
delicious irony.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Poop!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# you were/are an alter boy
AICMFP
or something as i'm no good with acronyms
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:44, archived)
# WTHAYBOA?
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:44, archived)
# i know that one
or can at least work it out
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# all these acronyms just look welsh to me.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# do you sleep with a crucifix above the bed?
poperush!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Feck off! :)
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:50, archived)
# Oh yes.
Yes indeed.
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:51, archived)
# hohoho!
(, Tue 10 Feb 2009, 13:52, archived)