shut the fuck up
that fucking idiot. Hasn't made a good film since Reservoir Dogs, and that wasn't very good either.
I absolutly loathe that cretin.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:49, Reply)
that fucking idiot. Hasn't made a good film since Reservoir Dogs, and that wasn't very good either.
I absolutly loathe that cretin.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:49, Reply)
He will produce gold again...of this you can be sure. All creatives have desert periods.
Abrahms however, lives in a desert bereft of of even the slightest originality.
IMHO...and i know fookall
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:53, Reply)
Abrahms however, lives in a desert bereft of of even the slightest originality.
IMHO...and i know fookall
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:53, Reply)
See below my list of films he has made since Reservoir Dogs.
Yes, there is always a long time between his films, but that is to be expected of someone with artistic integrity who won't just simply rape an old film for his own gains. I know whose films I would much rather see....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:00, Reply)
Yes, there is always a long time between his films, but that is to be expected of someone with artistic integrity who won't just simply rape an old film for his own gains. I know whose films I would much rather see....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:00, Reply)
Are you actually being serious?
Allow me to list his films since Reservoir Dogs that have been brilliant.
Pulp Fiction
Jackie Brown
Kill Bill Part 1
Kill Bill Part 2
Death Proof
Granted, the man doesn't do a lot of work, but he is pretty much batting a thousand.
Now, let's compare that with JJ Abrams:
Mission:Impossible III
Star Trek
Now, I haven't seen Star Trek, and I have heard good things about so ok. However, you can not even compare Abrams to Tarantino.
And to be honest, saying something like "[Tarantino] Hasn't made a good film since Reservoir Dogs, and that wasn't very good either." actually shows up how much of a cretin you are.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:58, Reply)
Allow me to list his films since Reservoir Dogs that have been brilliant.
Pulp Fiction
Jackie Brown
Kill Bill Part 1
Kill Bill Part 2
Death Proof
Granted, the man doesn't do a lot of work, but he is pretty much batting a thousand.
Now, let's compare that with JJ Abrams:
Mission:Impossible III
Star Trek
Now, I haven't seen Star Trek, and I have heard good things about so ok. However, you can not even compare Abrams to Tarantino.
And to be honest, saying something like "[Tarantino] Hasn't made a good film since Reservoir Dogs, and that wasn't very good either." actually shows up how much of a cretin you are.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 15:58, Reply)
Lest we also forget that he wrote
True Romance and Natural Born Killers.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:08, Reply)
True Romance and Natural Born Killers.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:08, Reply)
Bollocks
He's a hack. Every movie he's ever made has been a massive rip off of somebody else work, por relies on someone elses work for the best bits of the film. And the NBK treatment he wrote wan't even the one that Stone used to make the movie. He's a rip off merchant who doesn't erven have the good grace to tell everyone who he's used for his newest "original" film. Just see Ringo Lam and City On Fire, then come back and say he's original and talented. And his dialoghue sucsk now. Oh, and Kill Bill 1 and 2 were two terrible and self indulgent films that could've been one average movie.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:10, Reply)
He's a hack. Every movie he's ever made has been a massive rip off of somebody else work, por relies on someone elses work for the best bits of the film. And the NBK treatment he wrote wan't even the one that Stone used to make the movie. He's a rip off merchant who doesn't erven have the good grace to tell everyone who he's used for his newest "original" film. Just see Ringo Lam and City On Fire, then come back and say he's original and talented. And his dialoghue sucsk now. Oh, and Kill Bill 1 and 2 were two terrible and self indulgent films that could've been one average movie.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:10, Reply)
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand the American film industry
is currently brimming over with talent, who are producing stuff way better then QT right now.....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:22, Reply)
is currently brimming over with talent, who are producing stuff way better then QT right now.....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:22, Reply)
Well, thats not really relevant now is it?
I'm not critiquing the Hollywood system, but Tarantino. Hush up.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 10:31, Reply)
I'm not critiquing the Hollywood system, but Tarantino. Hush up.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 10:31, Reply)
Ha ha ha!
His accent annoys me so I am going to say everything he has ever done is utter wank! ;)
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:11, Reply)
His accent annoys me so I am going to say everything he has ever done is utter wank! ;)
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:11, Reply)
Let's be fair here 'sushi,
the only brilliant film out of that Tarantino list you've mentioned is Jackie Brown.
Pulp Fiction is over hyped for what it is, Kill Bill was indulgent dross, and as for Death Proof, it was an interesting distraction at best.
J. Brown has the best cast, best acting, best story and best dialogue of anything he's done since 'Dogs
/lol omg opinionz on the internet lolz
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:12, Reply)
the only brilliant film out of that Tarantino list you've mentioned is Jackie Brown.
Pulp Fiction is over hyped for what it is, Kill Bill was indulgent dross, and as for Death Proof, it was an interesting distraction at best.
J. Brown has the best cast, best acting, best story and best dialogue of anything he's done since 'Dogs
/lol omg opinionz on the internet lolz
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:12, Reply)
Oh of course sir,
I am expressing personal opinion here. However, I am pretty sure that you wouldn't come out calling him a cretin and stating that even Reservoir Dogs wasn't very good at all. I personally would say that J Brown is my favourite Tarantino film, but Pulp Fiction would be second with Dogs third. All personal opinion of course :)
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:15, Reply)
I am expressing personal opinion here. However, I am pretty sure that you wouldn't come out calling him a cretin and stating that even Reservoir Dogs wasn't very good at all. I personally would say that J Brown is my favourite Tarantino film, but Pulp Fiction would be second with Dogs third. All personal opinion of course :)
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:15, Reply)
Again, resevoir dogs is not his own movie.
Its an americanised version of City on Fire, down to the double handgun stylistic thing. Plus, City on Fire has Chow Yun Fat being all good and Hong Kong and that
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:11, Reply)
Its an americanised version of City on Fire, down to the double handgun stylistic thing. Plus, City on Fire has Chow Yun Fat being all good and Hong Kong and that
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:11, Reply)
City is fire is quite poor
And it is very different to Reservoir dogs.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:56, Reply)
And it is very different to Reservoir dogs.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 20:56, Reply)
Fair Point.
But it was a large influence on Resevoir Dogs. I just can't stand Tarantino, he's started to become intolerable. No good films in at least 10 years plus arsehole credentials equals unlikable up himself wanker.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 10:59, Reply)
But it was a large influence on Resevoir Dogs. I just can't stand Tarantino, he's started to become intolerable. No good films in at least 10 years plus arsehole credentials equals unlikable up himself wanker.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 10:59, Reply)
Pulp Fiction had a lot of firsts and broke down a lot of barriers that are now imitated mercilessly
not the least of which was the way he humanized the bad guys by way of passing-the-time banter. without pulp fiction you'd never have had Sexy Beast, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels or Snatch, anything like that.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 22:26, Reply)
not the least of which was the way he humanized the bad guys by way of passing-the-time banter. without pulp fiction you'd never have had Sexy Beast, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels or Snatch, anything like that.
( , Mon 10 Aug 2009, 22:26, Reply)
OK
i wasn't saying JJ Abrams was any good either. I was just stating how overrated Tarantino is.
You bring up his track record. I call every single film he's done post-Dogs is mere droll. JJ Abrams isn't the most original of directors (i.e sequals, revamps in Godzilla, Star Trek) but at least he breathed new life into everything he's done. Tarantino, in comparison, merely takes pop culture references and squeezes every last breath out of them.
Pulp Fiction is just a homage to 70s chic.
Jackie Brown a continuation, and just futhers my point on unoriginality that he took so long to make, directly following Fiction.
Kill Bill in itself was terrible, but the man is so vain that not only is he parodying Western takes on Asian filmmaking that it starts to parody his older work.
And Death Proof was simply boring and misogynistic.
There was tension in Dogs. That's what made it interesting. It didn't feel like a homage, it had closer ties to theatre than anything made in the 60s and 70s. He threw all that away with a constant string overstyled shout-outs. Balls to the man.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:16, Reply)
i wasn't saying JJ Abrams was any good either. I was just stating how overrated Tarantino is.
You bring up his track record. I call every single film he's done post-Dogs is mere droll. JJ Abrams isn't the most original of directors (i.e sequals, revamps in Godzilla, Star Trek) but at least he breathed new life into everything he's done. Tarantino, in comparison, merely takes pop culture references and squeezes every last breath out of them.
Pulp Fiction is just a homage to 70s chic.
Jackie Brown a continuation, and just futhers my point on unoriginality that he took so long to make, directly following Fiction.
Kill Bill in itself was terrible, but the man is so vain that not only is he parodying Western takes on Asian filmmaking that it starts to parody his older work.
And Death Proof was simply boring and misogynistic.
There was tension in Dogs. That's what made it interesting. It didn't feel like a homage, it had closer ties to theatre than anything made in the 60s and 70s. He threw all that away with a constant string overstyled shout-outs. Balls to the man.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:16, Reply)
Meh, we'll just have to agree to disagree here I guess.
And who cares anyway, Brewster's Millions is on now....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:33, Reply)
And who cares anyway, Brewster's Millions is on now....
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:33, Reply)
This
In fuckin spades! Tarrontino should be arrested for the amount of plagourism in 'his' work!
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:41, Reply)
In fuckin spades! Tarrontino should be arrested for the amount of plagourism in 'his' work!
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:41, Reply)
In response to the 'breathing new life in to star trek' bit.
New life was breathed in to Batman, the difference is, it didn't shit all over Batmans core audience.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 19:45, Reply)
Ha!
Great comment. And probably why the new Batman films are superior. But i never really watched the Star Trek series so it didn't bother me all that much.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 19:52, Reply)
Great comment. And probably why the new Batman films are superior. But i never really watched the Star Trek series so it didn't bother me all that much.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 19:52, Reply)
Plus
the Abrams/Tarantino debate was only down to the content in the video. No-one brought it up.
And anyone who says 'i haven't seen *said film*, but...' has no scope of the arguement as a whole, and opinion as thus is invalid.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:44, Reply)
the Abrams/Tarantino debate was only down to the content in the video. No-one brought it up.
And anyone who says 'i haven't seen *said film*, but...' has no scope of the arguement as a whole, and opinion as thus is invalid.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:44, Reply)
Excuse me?
I said I haven't seen Star Trek but I have heard good things about it. I have not passed judgment on it and wouldn't as I haven't seen it.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:48, Reply)
I said I haven't seen Star Trek but I have heard good things about it. I have not passed judgment on it and wouldn't as I haven't seen it.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:48, Reply)
I was just pointing out that you can't make a comment like 'you can not even compare Abrams to Tarantino' when you haven't even seen Abrams' full body of work.
Not that i was comparing them, originally.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:01, Reply)
Well yes, of course you can.
So for example, I have not heard all of The Beatles work, and I haven't heard all of The Beach Boys work. However, I can still comment and compare them.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:06, Reply)
So for example, I have not heard all of The Beatles work, and I haven't heard all of The Beach Boys work. However, I can still comment and compare them.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:06, Reply)
You can
but your opinion won't be as valid as someone who HAS heard all of each artists' work.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:11, Reply)
but your opinion won't be as valid as someone who HAS heard all of each artists' work.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:11, Reply)
and how, exactly?
The validity of your opinion is weighed directly upon how much exposure you've had to whatever topic of choice. In any medium.
I'm sorry mate but the second anyone goes 'I haven't seen it, but...' i just switch off. Doesn't cut the mustard.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:43, Reply)
The validity of your opinion is weighed directly upon how much exposure you've had to whatever topic of choice. In any medium.
I'm sorry mate but the second anyone goes 'I haven't seen it, but...' i just switch off. Doesn't cut the mustard.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:43, Reply)
I said I haven't seen it, but I have heard good things about it.
I wasn't going to say it was shit, and I wasn't going to say it was good. I haven't seen it, so I can't express my opinion. I was stating that I could not pass judgment upon it for that exact reason as part of the bigger statement. Either you are being deliberately obtuse here, or you really do need to sort your head out.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:04, Reply)
I wasn't going to say it was shit, and I wasn't going to say it was good. I haven't seen it, so I can't express my opinion. I was stating that I could not pass judgment upon it for that exact reason as part of the bigger statement. Either you are being deliberately obtuse here, or you really do need to sort your head out.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:04, Reply)
That is not what i am pointing out
What i am saying is, in your original post you stated 'Now, let's compare that with JJ Abrams' whilst not seeing all his work. That is what is annoying me. Nothing obtuse about it. Fairly simple.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:16, Reply)
What i am saying is, in your original post you stated 'Now, let's compare that with JJ Abrams' whilst not seeing all his work. That is what is annoying me. Nothing obtuse about it. Fairly simple.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 18:16, Reply)
I haven't seen all of Tarantino's films, but...
...I want to pick you up and shake you until all the stupid falls out.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:00, Reply)
...I want to pick you up and shake you until all the stupid falls out.
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:00, Reply)
*cough*Dusk til Dawn*cough*
レッド寿司 I would totally go gay go Clooney in that film.
I much prefer john hughes :-(
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:16, Reply)
レッド寿司 I would totally go gay go Clooney in that film.
I much prefer john hughes :-(
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:16, Reply)
*cough*four rooms*cough*
this bit:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9exU6RHm1bw
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:59, Reply)
this bit:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9exU6RHm1bw
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 17:59, Reply)
pulp fiction was ok
if you watch it too much it seems a bit pretentious
the others you meantioned are shit though
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 22:15, Reply)
if you watch it too much it seems a bit pretentious
the others you meantioned are shit though
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 22:15, Reply)
uh oh
sounds like somebody didn't get his autograph when he queued up for him :S
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:01, Reply)
sounds like somebody didn't get his autograph when he queued up for him :S
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 16:01, Reply)
i was about to try arguing with you ian
then i remembered you're a cunt
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 19:25, Reply)
then i remembered you're a cunt
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 19:25, Reply)
i was starting to think i was the only one
who doesnt just jizz in their pants everytime he decides to make a file
and then rant on about how great it is for ages just becaues he made it
im not a fan of jj abrams either
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 22:13, Reply)
who doesnt just jizz in their pants everytime he decides to make a file
and then rant on about how great it is for ages just becaues he made it
im not a fan of jj abrams either
( , Sun 9 Aug 2009, 22:13, Reply)