well he's got a point.
I fucking hate Christmas.
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:24,
Reply)
I thought you loved the little baby jesus all wrapped up swaddling clothes?
(pissflaps.FSPW, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:38,
Reply)
he did his best work as an adult, really.
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:40,
Reply)
What did he do before he became famous?
(pissflaps.FSPW, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:41,
Reply)
helped his dad in the workship maybe, I dunno.
There's some weird ass shit in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, but nobody takes that very seriously.
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:43,
Reply)
I have my doubts about Thomas.
(pissflaps.FSPW, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:46,
Reply)
Doubting Thomas!!!
(skeltonatorNeeds some new daps., Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:55,
Reply)
the best bits of the bible
are the bits no one takes very seriously.
(LP, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:47,
Reply)
the bits I like the most
are the bits that atheists cite as the worst bits.
Like the bit where Elisha is getting mocked by a bunch of kids, and he curses them in the name of the Lord, and they get eaten by bears. I love that bit. Totally wish I could do that sometimes.
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:51,
Reply)
And the bit when mohammed pops some wheelies on his BMX, that was so cool.
(pissflaps.FSPW, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:56,
Reply)
atheists who cite "the worst bits" of the bible really wind me up
Very rarely have they read the whole book (mind you, same goes for a lot of people who call themselves christians) There's some *great* stuff in there, in parts it's a very entertaining read.
The problem is never with the book, it's with the people that interpret it - and that leads me back to my point which was that the bits people take incredibly seriously (and use as an excuse to be a bit-of-a-dick about things) often seem to be the least interesting bits.
(LP, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:57,
Reply)
they can't see the wood for the trees
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 19:09,
Reply)
Genesis.
Jacob is tricked by Laban, the father of Rachel and Leah. Jacob asks for Rachel so that he can "go in unto her." But Laban gives him Leah instead, and Jacob "went in unto her [Leah]" by mistake. Jacob was fooled until morning -- apparently he didn't know who he was going in unto. Finally they worked things out and Jacob got to "go in unto" Rachel, too. 29:21-30
(skeltonatorNeeds some new daps., Tue 17 Jul 2012, 19:01,
Reply)
that whole story line
is a bit lolShakespeare.
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 19:03,
Reply)
I was thinking maybe an early E.L. James.
Fuck! now there is an idea!!!!
Sorted, just have to autoreplace the word qu'ran for the word cock and concubines for fat s ho's
then to find me a publishing house.
(skeltonatorNeeds some new daps., Tue 17 Jul 2012, 21:42,
Reply)
Blasphemy! He said it again!
Are there any women here today?
(The Oscillating Gibbonis eating curried squid, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:42,
Reply)
he's only making it worse for himself
(Moon Girl Technologieshorrendous beanbag, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:43,
Reply)
Fwow him to the fwoor
Swike him centuwion, vewwy wuphly! You wait til Biggus Dickus hears of this!
(The Oscillating Gibbonis eating curried squid, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 18:47,
Reply)
It's closed-minded
tunnel-visioned people like this that give the human race a bad name. Glad we're not all like this.
(Black MoonNot cracked, I'm all up to be., Tue 17 Jul 2012, 19:22,
Reply)
BUT HE SAID IT !!!
(MartinH, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 20:06,
Reply)