![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Music on vinyl records, mobile phones the size of house bricks and pornography printed on paper. What hideously out of date stuff do you still use?
Thanks to boozehound for the suggestion
( , Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:44)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
We don't have gas or oil central heating. We have a wood burner.
Upsides...
I own & regularly use a chainsaw
I own & regularly use a selection of axes
It looks lovely
It smells lovely
It's carbon neutral & therefore good for the planet
Chopping wood although hard work is immensely satisfying & makes me feel very manly ;)
Downsides....
It's fucking cold in our house in the morning till the fire gets going again
ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash ash fuckingash
Wood takes up a lot of room
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:25, 25 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
AICMFP.
Although he sensibly does have central heating to go on first thing in the morning while they sort the fire out.
Christmas is fucking LUSH in such an environment.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:31, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So that it's not fucking cold in your house in the morning till the fire gets going again.
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 9:37, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I just need to rig up a treadmill for the dogs & daughter to power the TV and I can tell the electricity company to fuck themselves too ;o)
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 17:08, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
really carbon neutral? I'm quite surprised at that.
OK, it beats digging up rotted plankton and burning that, but still...
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:41, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The plant material absorbs carbon as part of the growth process, and releases almost all of it during combustion. I'm going to assume that the burning is not 100% efficient, so burning wood is
*Not a scientist. Just guessing.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:57, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 14:18, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So I offset it by burning an old armchair.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 17:03, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Letting wood slowly rot releases cardon dioxide and methane. Burning it just releases carbon dioxide.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 14:22, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Because the tree was the actual carbon neutral part of it.
Trees are one big 'sink' of carbon, during the growth of the organism it gains a lot of carbon that is taken from the atmosphere, burning it releases a great deal of carbon.
Killing the tree by cutting it down for firewood and burning it, not only are you releasing the carbon within its wood, but you are also responsible for that tree no longer being able to store more carbon in future.
The best thing would be to leave the tree until it died naturally, but as IHateSprouts said, rotting wood would produce methane, which is more harmful than carbon dioxide to the ecosystem. So that the best way to do it would be burning dead wood.
That way you ensure that the carbon actually stays in the carbon sink for longer and it was able to store the most carbon.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 15:36, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Most of my wood comes from either tree surgeons (I know 2) or sustainable suppliers. I also get oak and larch offcuts from a woodframed house building company. And they do indeed replant what they chop down except the tree surgeons obviously.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 16:58, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The logs I burn are from pruned trees and those felled for other reasons (e.g. they were diseased and unstable). Tree surgeons are always lopping branches and tops off trees and that's what gets turned into firewood round my way.
Of course, if someone is going round clear-felling trees purely for firewood, that would be environmentally dodgy.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 17:47, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If you get it running properly you shouldn't have too much ash left.
It also it helps to keep a bed of it for the logs to sit on.
It shouldn't go out if you put a couple logs on and get the vents right before you go to bed. It should just tick over.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 13:43, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You'd keep some of the peats from the outside of the stack handy, and they would just burn very slowly all night.
Cutting peat is even harder work than cutting wood, but it is still immensely satisfying.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 14:47, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Stacking drying peats when the midges are out doesn't come near my 'satisfying' list :)
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 15:14, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I had to put somthing in the negative column
As for the fire going out. I can stack it up and shut down all the vents and there will only be embers in the morning. I just bung some kindling on and some smaller logs open it up and it's soon going
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 17:04, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm scratching imaginary midgies now. I may live half a world away now, but the memory of miserable times at the mercy of those little buggers is still strong.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 23:09, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Ive got a Stihl. It matches my big cock. And my Stihl scrub bar (for gorse and blackberry)
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 3:59, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
ok toxic ash, but stays in all night and does not involve moving machinery (unless you are a collier)
and the carbon has just been sat around for ages doing nothing.
( , Wed 10 Nov 2010, 23:05, closed)
« Go Back