Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Ignore code change
We've fiddled with the ignore code on B3ta so that it works both ways. If you ignore a person they can't see your posts, as well as you can't see theirs.
This means - in theory - if you have someone you find persistently annoying (say they post horrid things on your answers to the QOTW) then ignore them once, and they'll stop seeing your posts so they can't post and ruin your stories.
If you can test this amongst yourselves and report back to this thread that would be really helpful.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 19:40, 137 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
We've fiddled with the ignore code on B3ta so that it works both ways. If you ignore a person they can't see your posts, as well as you can't see theirs.
This means - in theory - if you have someone you find persistently annoying (say they post horrid things on your answers to the QOTW) then ignore them once, and they'll stop seeing your posts so they can't post and ruin your stories.
If you can test this amongst yourselves and report back to this thread that would be really helpful.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 19:40, 137 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
This is a bit disappointing.
I can still see a bunch of people who I hoped had put me on ignore.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:18, Reply)
I can still see a bunch of people who I hoped had put me on ignore.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:18, Reply)
Because Chompy and Swipe
Will both end up starting new threads every few hours.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:02, Reply)
Will both end up starting new threads every few hours.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:02, Reply)
but in all seriousness,
i'm not sure this is a good idea Rob.
There are those that click ignore over the slightest things, and some of the highest comedy comes in bizarre subthreads. It would be a shame to miss a great pun thread because some mincing nancy has put me on ignore for not believing they had sex with a honda accord.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:05, Reply)
i'm not sure this is a good idea Rob.
There are those that click ignore over the slightest things, and some of the highest comedy comes in bizarre subthreads. It would be a shame to miss a great pun thread because some mincing nancy has put me on ignore for not believing they had sex with a honda accord.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:05, Reply)
I'm still convinced clicking the ignore button should just highlight your post pink with a I'M TAKING IT ALL TOO SERIOUSLY marqueeing around the outside
could solve a lot of issues
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:17, Reply)
could solve a lot of issues
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:17, Reply)
in theory it's for the whole site
other than the FP - but it's not really tested fully yet
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:13, Reply)
other than the FP - but it's not really tested fully yet
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:13, Reply)
also,
explain me something, if i log out, the top 2 threads in /ot don't show up. whats that about?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:10, Reply)
explain me something, if i log out, the top 2 threads in /ot don't show up. whats that about?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:10, Reply)
We should all ignore everyone
then sit here wondering why it's all shit and no-one's posting.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:12, Reply)
then sit here wondering why it's all shit and no-one's posting.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:12, Reply)
So then how can you see what they may be saying about you? Say If they were mentioning your real name or something? You wouldn't be able to see it they had you on ignore.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:19, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:19, Reply)
How would they know? Surely only your friends know your real name?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:23, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:23, Reply)
quite a lot of us know each other's real names through facebook.
For example, I know chompy's real name, even though I wouldn't class him as a real friend.
Saying that, I'm not enough of a cunt to spread around the internet
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:27, Reply)
For example, I know chompy's real name, even though I wouldn't class him as a real friend.
Saying that, I'm not enough of a cunt to spread around the internet
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:27, Reply)
But others can. That's my point. How do would you know if someone was postng stuff you'd rather wasn't there?
EDIT: about you, personal info etc.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:39, Reply)
EDIT: about you, personal info etc.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:39, Reply)
mods always step in when that happens, whether you've seen it or not
so, if you're not on, and I say you live on 122 knob st, they'll delete it before someone can do anything with it
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:46, Reply)
so, if you're not on, and I say you live on 122 knob st, they'll delete it before someone can do anything with it
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:46, Reply)
OT isn't modded. I experienced this exact issue last night, if the person had me on ignore I wouldn't have seen it.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:50, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:50, Reply)
I've never put anyone on ignore, I'm too scared I'll miss a good flounce :(
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:23, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:23, Reply)
Turns out I have little lord Fauntleroy on ignore
I don't remember doing it though
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:24, Reply)
I don't remember doing it though
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:24, Reply)
I think I've got quite a few on ignore from my /board days.
Don't think I've extended it to here though.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:28, Reply)
Don't think I've extended it to here though.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:28, Reply)
i'm putting you all on ignore so i can slag you off behind your backs
pricks
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:28, Reply)
pricks
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:28, Reply)
But, I love everyone, why would I ignore them?
Except Janet, I hope she has me on ignore.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:29, Reply)
Except Janet, I hope she has me on ignore.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:29, Reply)
Would it be better
to have ignore set up so that the ignore switch resets after a week/fortnight/month/year? It may give an element of control to the abused, and give the abuser a chance to redeem themselves.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:48, Reply)
to have ignore set up so that the ignore switch resets after a week/fortnight/month/year? It may give an element of control to the abused, and give the abuser a chance to redeem themselves.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:48, Reply)
yep,
Thread is gone when i'm logged in, log out, post a reply, and there it is.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:50, Reply)
Thread is gone when i'm logged in, log out, post a reply, and there it is.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:50, Reply)
you can steal see them using search too
pretty sure the mods here are even worse than they get credit for
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:52, Reply)
pretty sure the mods here are even worse than they get credit for
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:52, Reply)
i dunno q,
they're experimenting, give them some time to figure out the bugs.
I'm just sad that rob felt the need to ignore me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:53, Reply)
they're experimenting, give them some time to figure out the bugs.
I'm just sad that rob felt the need to ignore me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:53, Reply)
On the bright side if they have you on ignore
They can't step you can they?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:56, Reply)
They can't step you can they?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:56, Reply)
i hope rob ignores himself, and loses control of the site completely and even internet locksmith cr3 will be like 'no way man, that thing's like leaving the keys inside fort knox, we're screwed'
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:07, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:07, Reply)
Does that mean you've taken me off ignore then, you ginger spastic?
Also, this is a really stupid idea.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:55, Reply)
Also, this is a really stupid idea.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:55, Reply)
it is like they're deliberately ruining the site
first by adding too many thinly spread boards, then by listening and pandering to the whingers every whim with the closing of QOTWs and double-blind ignoring
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:57, Reply)
first by adding too many thinly spread boards, then by listening and pandering to the whingers every whim with the closing of QOTWs and double-blind ignoring
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 20:57, Reply)
It's almost as though they haven't a fucking clue what they're doing.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:00, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:00, Reply)
I'm gonna set up shitloads of new accounts, wait until the noob plates are off,
then ignore myself from different angles.
That'll fuggin learn me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:02, Reply)
then ignore myself from different angles.
That'll fuggin learn me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:02, Reply)
We should all ignore ourselves,
then the entire site will explode.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:18, Reply)
then the entire site will explode.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:18, Reply)
It'd totally be like a big ignore blackhole man, that'd be way cool.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:21, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:21, Reply)
why not just institute a word filter that changes all negative words to happy cheery ones?
so this sentence would become: "why yes just institute a word filter that changes all positive words to happy cheery ones?
that way people would be forced into posting positive feedback no matter what excreble dross they were confronted with
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:07, Reply)
so this sentence would become: "why yes just institute a word filter that changes all positive words to happy cheery ones?
that way people would be forced into posting positive feedback no matter what excreble dross they were confronted with
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:07, Reply)
Why doesn't everyone just man the fuck up and stop getting upset at some pixels on a screen that they can easily turn off and go and do something productive?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:10, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:10, Reply)
I'm not sure it's a great idea TBH
If you log out you can see if someone has posted who is ignoring you. Then when you log back in I assume you would still be able to gaz them? I'd rather people I'm ignoring don't know I'm ignoring them. I'm saying that from the point of view of someone who has spent the day getting some really unpleasant abuse by a nutter on /links who I eventually put on ignore. I wouldn't want to give him any more ammunition towards me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:20, Reply)
If you log out you can see if someone has posted who is ignoring you. Then when you log back in I assume you would still be able to gaz them? I'd rather people I'm ignoring don't know I'm ignoring them. I'm saying that from the point of view of someone who has spent the day getting some really unpleasant abuse by a nutter on /links who I eventually put on ignore. I wouldn't want to give him any more ammunition towards me.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:20, Reply)
Right, putting being an internet wanker aside for a minute, this really isn't the best idea.
Say someone has me on ignore for no reason other than I once posted something disagreeing with/mocking them slightly, then they start a thread that has a brilliant subthread. I would then miss out on said subthread purely because someone else can't take criticism/a joke. It's just going to become another thing that is ruining the site, like the reply function in /qotw turned that into a hive of bitching and upset.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:22, Reply)
Say someone has me on ignore for no reason other than I once posted something disagreeing with/mocking them slightly, then they start a thread that has a brilliant subthread. I would then miss out on said subthread purely because someone else can't take criticism/a joke. It's just going to become another thing that is ruining the site, like the reply function in /qotw turned that into a hive of bitching and upset.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:22, Reply)
Awww. Blub blub blub.
When was the last time anything approaching an amusing subthread ever happened here ever like ever ever? Prick.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:50, Reply)
When was the last time anything approaching an amusing subthread ever happened here ever like ever ever? Prick.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:50, Reply)
If I had 'Ken' Oaf on pricknore
I would have missed his funny little tantrum and then where would we be?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:54, Reply)
I would have missed his funny little tantrum and then where would we be?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:54, Reply)
If you were that desperate couldn't you just log out or use a different browser or sutin?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:58, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:58, Reply)
Oh man. I can't believe you'd tease me about my inconveniently massive cock and balls.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 22:04, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 22:04, Reply)
Couldn't you just have just banned the persistent whingers rather than give in to them?
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:56, Reply)
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 21:56, Reply)
Interesting
given we are now going to have the final word in any thread, just before we put someone on ignore
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 22:20, Reply)
given we are now going to have the final word in any thread, just before we put someone on ignore
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 22:20, Reply)
I've never put anyone on ignore, and never will. I like the banter, even when I'm taking the internet too seriously/am a shut-in/have never fucked a woman/am bringing up another man's children/have misunderstood the nature of a 'comedy' website/am a tedious white knight/am a spastic shitcunt/have Autism/am a prick/puppydog/shed/GOTEAMGB/whatever...
But I think, in general, it'll tidy up QOTW a bit. Let those who want to bicker, bicker - and those who don't can just opt out and live a life of Matrix-like fluffy pretense.
All, in all, and not that it matters one little bit, I approve. Might be strengthened with an IP log, though - stop people logging into multiple accounts from the same IP within a certain period of time. Obviously, relatively easy to thwart, but will stop the casual, non-technical cunt from simply logging into a comedy account to continue making their hilariously cutting and salient jibes.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 23:50, Reply)
I'm not convinced this is a good idea.
I do realise the puerile trolling has been an issue - I say grow a thicker skin or find the door.
A couple of "Geoffrey Robertson's" to highlight some issues.
If I had Rob on ignore then surely there's a good chance I wouldn't have received this post and thus wouldn't be writing this reply and I imagine a few people couldn't read the post cause I had replied to it - even tho I wouldn't be replying because I wouldn't have been able to see it in the first place...
Tautological much?
The other query is this - atm when say... Shambo gets in a huff with me cause I've replied to 1 of his posts or replies he deletes the whole thread and then frequently re-opens the thread, thus removing everyone else's carefully thought, poignant arguments.
Won't that be the case from the outset with this plan? Why should everyone else miss out on a good thread just because I've pointed out to a type-writer bashing monkey what an idiotic argument they're making.
My solution is as a couple of others have suggested - remove the reply function from qotw and make OT the battle ground for the replies. That way if Rory wants to slander my employment choice he has to ref. the link in OT and I can choose to respond to him rather than having to deal with it in my own thread.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 23:52, Reply)
I do realise the puerile trolling has been an issue - I say grow a thicker skin or find the door.
A couple of "Geoffrey Robertson's" to highlight some issues.
If I had Rob on ignore then surely there's a good chance I wouldn't have received this post and thus wouldn't be writing this reply and I imagine a few people couldn't read the post cause I had replied to it - even tho I wouldn't be replying because I wouldn't have been able to see it in the first place...
Tautological much?
The other query is this - atm when say... Shambo gets in a huff with me cause I've replied to 1 of his posts or replies he deletes the whole thread and then frequently re-opens the thread, thus removing everyone else's carefully thought, poignant arguments.
Won't that be the case from the outset with this plan? Why should everyone else miss out on a good thread just because I've pointed out to a type-writer bashing monkey what an idiotic argument they're making.
My solution is as a couple of others have suggested - remove the reply function from qotw and make OT the battle ground for the replies. That way if Rory wants to slander my employment choice he has to ref. the link in OT and I can choose to respond to him rather than having to deal with it in my own thread.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 23:52, Reply)
Yeah, sorry about that.
Turns out rob being a bellend unifies folk, though.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 23:58, Reply)
Turns out rob being a bellend unifies folk, though.
( , Wed 1 Aug 2012, 23:58, Reply)
I think you should all gaz him and ask why he keeps sickipedia going if he's not a racist.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 0:00, Reply)
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 0:00, Reply)
Meh.
1 tenth of my life down the internet's shitter.
EDIT: I'm sorry for calling you a dumb cunt - that was rude. Plz don't put me on ignore etc...
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 0:23, Reply)
1 tenth of my life down the internet's shitter.
EDIT: I'm sorry for calling you a dumb cunt - that was rude. Plz don't put me on ignore etc...
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 0:23, Reply)
& now I'm on side with Battered as well?!
FFS!
Fucking polarising topic is polarising.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:29, Reply)
FFS!
Fucking polarising topic is polarising.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:29, Reply)
So your plan to combat the already large amounts of dupe accounts that exist and will surely increase with this action, is?
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:35, Reply)
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:35, Reply)
i don't think he understands no one reads old threads on /ot.
Poor qftw refugee.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:57, Reply)
Poor qftw refugee.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 7:57, Reply)
You need to talk to Rory about my employment situation.
Don't know how that works for you "2" but just don't shout too loud in the same room as you'll wake the neighbours.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 12:56, Reply)
Don't know how that works for you "2" but just don't shout too loud in the same room as you'll wake the neighbours.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 12:56, Reply)
Or he may have been at work. Also, reading & posting on a website isn't the focus of his entire waking moments.
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 8:16, Reply)
( , Thu 2 Aug 2012, 8:16, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »