Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I think the argument is that the arts is such a vanishingly small percentage of government spending anyway that cutting it is pretty pointless as far as cutting the deficit goes. then again it depends if you view the arts as important stuff of a pointless frippery that should not be supported by government in the first place.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 10:39, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
An awful lot of things make excellent Aunt Sallies for the Daily Mail and the like. "waa waa waa cunts in the armed forces and THIS Lesbian interpretive dance was funded" or "veterans can't heat their homes and this immigrant has a house that costs £12,000 a month" Yes, because Lesbian dance budget is thousands of times less than the defence budget. See also housing benefit costs a lot less than pensions.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 10:49, Reply)
because there are too many stupid people. this is true for many reasons, but in this particular case of funding, they don't put in what they take out.
did you see the guy in the paper who handed over £20 to a guy in the pub when he saw him drop it? the recipient thanked him by beating seven shades of crap out of him, and grinding a severed bar stool leg into his eye, which he lost as a consequence. wtf is wrong with britain, man?
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:00, Reply)
random culls on saturdays on various high streets?
carpet bombing wales?
lethal injection for anyone who got less than a 2:1?
forced sterilisation for anyone called daz, maz, baz or gaz?
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:04, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:06, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:10, Reply)
And taxing you more to pay for it.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:09, Reply)
my tax bill for july will be seven thousand pounds. do you know how much that hurts, to pay that much tax in one month? arrrrrgh.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:23, Reply)
She is not IN ANY WAY a bloated fat cat living of the misery of the poor and being grossly over paid for a job that no one needs doing in the first place.
oh no.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:33, Reply)
nobody has rights that should be enshrined, and everyone should be allowed to use everyone else's land for free, right?
don't be a handwringing muppet, mm-kay?
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:44, Reply)
also, yes they do and yes they should.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 12:24, Reply)
but the bonus tax hurts. it's only a little bonus, and i worked so fucking hard for it, i gave up weekends, evenings, i get a huge amount of stress... i do think bonuses under a small amount, say £5k, should be tax free, as they are a reward for killing yourself. obv it's different for proper fat-cats.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:45, Reply)
that I had to pay that much tax.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:37, Reply)
christ, i wish it was that much every month, what would that put me on, £200k?
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:48, Reply)
The amount of investment is to some degree irrelevant, it's the results that matter and investment for investments sake will not always drive these.
If I reported back to my boss and said,"Yes there are still problems with X, but the good news is I spent more money on it anyway" then I would be fired and rightly so.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:13, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:21, Reply)
but the amount spent is not a measure of success, which is how politicians like to use it.
"Why are NHS waiting lists getting longer, people dying etc etc"
"Well we invested an extra £8bn blah blah"; which is irrelevant if the measures of success aren't reached.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:31, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:42, Reply)
sterilisation and culling ftw
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:24, Reply)
cf. the royal family
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:28, Reply)
dreadful simpering vanilla piece of shite that she is
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:51, Reply)
People draw, bands make music, people dance, actors put on free plays all over the shop. Maybe cutting g the money might get rid of some of the dross forced out in to art schools and dance studios.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 10:53, Reply)
it's just that it's such a tiny, tiny fraction of the UK budget that it's meaningless to cut it.
In any case, the real problem is managed expenditure, not public sector spending. As per usual from the retard Gideon, he's trying to cut the wrong thing.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 10:56, Reply)
The only other question I have is, if we all know Gideon is wrong, and everyone else seems to know he's wrong, why is he still doing it?
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 10:59, Reply)
Trebles all round and a nice directorship or seven in the City when he finally gives up politics.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:02, Reply)
and has no idea of the financial world.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:08, Reply)
just keeps on with his mantra, he's practically a religious nutter, same applies to Jeremy Hunt and Michael Gove.
(, Wed 26 Jun 2013, 11:10, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread