b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 574297 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

Dear QOTW.
I want to talk to you all about a friend of mine, and who is hopefully a friend of yours. He goes on here by the name of Phsyco_Chomp. He brings a hell of a lot to this board, he speaks resonably and is a good laugh.

As far as I'm concerned, he's a top bloke and a top member.

Now, I understand that some people on here can be a bit sensative, have had hard lives and can write their own books on being on the wrong side of the tracks.

Some White Knight in Shinning Binary has complained against him to the mods, and he his voice (and the light in my life (and this board)) has been dimmed to a picture of a crying cat, for the next 3 days.

As such, I will not be posting on /qotw (aside from this thread) for the same time. I've seen the comment he was talking about, and some people seem to be stuck in a cotton ball bubble world.

I'll leave you with this.

EDIT Please don't go the mods about this, they're aware of the situation and if everyone bother's them, then it'll just be a bit shit, they don't need this crap as much as we don't.

EDIT 2 No point cutting my nose to spite my face, I'll still post, just won't be anything of any use.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:08, 138 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Is this still the thing from a fortnight ago?
Or has someone objected to something else he's said?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:10, Reply)
He said "holy shit, you've got tits?????" to some beaker.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:11, Reply)
Has he been banned?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:13, Reply)
Naughty Stepped for 3 days.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:14, Reply)
B3ta
From 'behind the bike sheds' to 'the infants corridor' in a few gazzes. What i don't understand is why the mods actually lend an ear to this pathetic nonsense. The complainee should be banned immediately in cases like this.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:17, Reply)
could someone link me up?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:10, Reply)
Damn straight.
This sounds like Archive Material.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:15, Reply)
I don't know the exact post, but I've just looked through his responces from the profile and can't see anything naughty-step material.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:16, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/pe/post573826#answers-post-573826
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:17, Reply)
he was banned for that?
nah, that can't be right, did you paste the wrong link?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:20, Reply)
.
This is the comment referred to above, so it made sense to link.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:27, Reply)
fair enough,
seems like a bizarre state of affairs though
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:28, Reply)
That's what he's told me.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:30, Reply)
Nah, come on
What else did he do? It's a bit of a stretch to think the likes of cr3 would ban him for that.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:51, Reply)
Now, now, I'm quite the fan of Cr3, as far i'm concerned, he's a real top bloke too, I'm more than a little jelous of his skillz.
Don't put his name down as the mod who banned him, it could be any of the other mods.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:55, Reply)
"likes of cr3"
pretty unbelieveable it was him. I was just thinking that surely the other mods (whoever they are - I dunno) share similar sensibilities? this is just too absurd for b3ta. should have used different phrasing than "likes of" - didn't mean to slur on cr3. he's helped me out with a few things before.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:58, Reply)
There is no fucking way he got banned for ZOMG! TITS!
he must have gazzed a picture of his cock as well
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 17:45, Reply)
you cannot be serious

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:14, Reply)
FREE THE MILTON KEYNES ONE!

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:15, Reply)
What? SRSLY?
For the tits comment? Jesus, forget the tits, there's evidently an excess of cunt around.

WE WON'T FORGET YOU, PSYCHOCHOMP
*fist pump of righteousness*
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:20, Reply)
Who's PsychoChomp?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:24, Reply)
Just some girl
WITH BREASTS
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:17, Reply)
TO THE HONDA ACCORD !

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:28, Reply)
God almighty!
I'll say it again.
This is the site that brought us sweary keyboards and jokes about child abduction/paedophilia.

But whatever you do, don't say tits/breasts or make fun of someone else's posts. You'll get naughty-stepped.


is this really why he's been naughty-stepped? Surely not...
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:22, Reply)
What the...?
Bloody hell. I think b3ta may have just jumped the shark.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:24, Reply)
Let's have a Best Moments flashbacks episode of B3ta

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:26, Reply)
There was that time something funny happened.
Oh, how we laughed. Nuff said. I'll type more later if I can be bothered.
Good times.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:28, Reply)
Do you remember that time there was a misunderstanding?
And then it was explained and it turned out that nothing was amiss after all...
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:30, Reply)
there doesn't really seem to be too much laughter over here on offtopic

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:30, Reply)
I'd like to repeat the sentiment already repeated several times above me.
WTF? How can he get naughty-stepped for this? Am I still on B3ta, or have I accidentally clicked off onto some pathetic pussy site where the slightest thing gets grassed to the mods?
This poster, assuming she is the one that made the complaint is quite new, according to her profile... perhaps she hasn't quite grasped the concept of this site.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:30, Reply)
Maybe her friend Joe complained
Like a cyber-kick to Chomp's chops.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:32, Reply)
*checks profiles*
HOLY SHIT YOU'VE BOTH GOT BOOBS?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:35, Reply)
I'm gazzing the mods right now!!
You said 'holy', and 'boobs', and 'shit', and er, 'both'.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:37, Reply)
YEAH!
THIS! I'm, like, super offended now. I don't like my boobs being mentioned ONLINE
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:39, Reply)
I'm gazzing the mods!
In quoting him, you said 'sh*t'!
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:40, Reply)
Shit off

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:47, Reply)
Shut it bitch tits

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:14, Reply)
When you put it like that...

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:18, Reply)
It gives you a frothing clopper?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:19, Reply)
get out!!!

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:21, Reply)
Of your cavernous minge?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:44, Reply)
Nonono, you can only gaz the mods in behalf of someone else.
If anyone wants to do that to me, I can assure you all, I do put out on webcam.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:40, Reply)
I'd like to post the same thing and see if I get naughty stepped.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:32, Reply)
Do it.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:33, Reply)
Maybe we should all do that.
Like some kind of cyber protest-flashmob-thing
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:33, Reply)
this
we should all do it
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:35, Reply)
Where?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:35, Reply)
in the butt

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:36, Reply)
*lubes*

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:37, Reply)
Do it in quote-marks with a disclaimer.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:34, Reply)
BTW, can you guys popular page this so everyone who isn't here can see what a patheric person someone can be.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:34, Reply)
Hokey cokey
I like to play my part in history...
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:35, Reply)
Done my bit.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:41, Reply)
what sort of disclaimer?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:35, Reply)
Something like mine.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:38, Reply)
Save you any potential bother.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:39, Reply)
something like:
"HOLY SHIT!
You've got breasts???"

Disclaimer: I am channeling PsychoChomp. Good times, etc.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:39, Reply)
I would like to see your lovely female titty bags.
or ANY female b3tans tits for that matter


Phwoar, tits, eh lads?



*pushes the envelope of decency, waits to be naughty stepped*
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:37, Reply)
I just have
Fuck 'em


EDIT disclaimers are for poofs
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:39, Reply)

EDIT Disclaimer:
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:46, Reply)
agreeing with your edit
RIGHT HERE
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:47, Reply)
So why was the guy banned,
but the comment not deleted? Makes no sense to me, on top of the fact that the comment is actually a statement of fact, that the girl has tits.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:36, Reply)
A fact the poster does refer to in her post:
i.e. "my considerably large pert young breasts".
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:38, Reply)
I've put in my two-pen'orth.
I think I've ruined it all.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:43, Reply)
I have tits and no-one has ever been banned for mentioning them.
I feel used now.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:51, Reply)
OMG BREASTS!
FUCK.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:53, Reply)
Haha!
You've fallen into my trap.

*gazzes mods*
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:55, Reply)
You're not a schoolgirl
I think she's trumped us because hers were in a PE kit.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:55, Reply)
You have tits? Oh man, I've been going about my attitude to you all wrong.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:56, Reply)
(Acutally, I don't think I've treated you baddly, but for comedy's sake, let's say I have)

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:57, Reply)
A spoonful of breats
helps the holy shit go down
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:58, Reply)
Spoonfull?
Oh man, SAD FACE.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:02, Reply)
"more than a mouthful is just a waste"
or so I've heard
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:03, Reply)
I'll be honest, as long as there isn't mould built up from years of stagnent sweat, I'm not fussy.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:12, Reply)
I also have a penis, (allegedly)
Something for everyone.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 14:58, Reply)
Oh my mistake, I was right to begin with.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:02, Reply)
Don't believe the hype.....nananana!
I'm all woman. In fact I'm a woman and a half.

If I was anymore woman, I'd explode in a big ball of oestrogen.

YOU GET HOW WOMANLY I AM NOW!
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:08, Reply)
GO GO MIGHTY PANDATRON !

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:10, Reply)
Wait, do you put out first?

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:11, Reply)
Nope, because not only am I a woman I am also a laydee : )

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:13, Reply)
*Puts the pandatron back on the shelf*

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:16, Reply)
Actually it might be nice to have a few days rest from Pyschochomp.
But then again the same could be said for me.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:01, Reply)
but you post baby Jack Russells and sauce
Who could ever tire of those things?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:02, Reply)
That's true.
I'm loved.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:12, Reply)
And hero-worshipped
(I mean, check my sig ffs)
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:20, Reply)
Get a room
with BREASTS
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:28, Reply)
Join our club you cunt.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:30, Reply)
What do I have to do?
Something to do with saucy jack russells?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:31, Reply)
And you have to like a lotta chocolate on your Biscuit.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:32, Reply)
Hahahah!
I was going to post something like that.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:34, Reply)
*falls through the porch floorboards*

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:36, Reply)
For fuck's sake
Naughtystepping PC for that is ridiculous.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:04, Reply)
You tell 'em Enzyme!
then show us your tits
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:27, Reply)
Fuck yeah
Feel my indignation.

My throbbing indignation.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:53, Reply)
I prefer to think of it as your pulsating passion

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:06, Reply)
I go away for a few days and this happens?
it's an outrage. As you say, Chompy has brought a lot of sense to this board, as well as comedy.

Also, you said member. hehehehe
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 15:50, Reply)
Sense I can agree with but I think your pushing it with the comedy thing.

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:00, Reply)
*pushes it hard*

(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:01, Reply)
Don't say things like that.
I've got my libido back and it's not helping.
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:03, Reply)
haha
where did you find it?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:04, Reply)
have you heard about these floods?
total wash out.. I blame the flood defence experts
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:01, Reply)
I'll repeat what I just put in the other thread
Statistically 1 in 1000 years. Those are the highest flows that we model flooding for. Means a very low annual probility.
Flood defences are usually 1 in 100 for fluvial (river), 1 in 200 for tidal, but depends on the area. London's defences are probably 1 in 10000 or something.

Basically, even if there were defences, they'd still have been fucked.

I've been in St. Ives, where it has been blowing so hard I've hardly slept all weekend.

Now I'm going to get stoned and watch Empire Strikes Back
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 16:04, Reply)
That's not right!
Over the word breasts?
(, Mon 23 Nov 2009, 17:56, Reply)
YOU HAVE HOLY BOOBS?
SHIT!
(, Tue 24 Nov 2009, 1:48, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1