Their, there, they're i go again
I'm no genius in the world of grammar,but am i the only one who gets pissed off at the constant use of the wrong version of "there" being used on forums, blogs etc.
There are three different versions for a reason.
I just wish the lazy fuckwits would learn how to use them. cunts.
(boarders You won't catch me with my trousers, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 18:42, 24 replies)

thank you.
clicky.
( Rev. Jayneflakes Buy my book, I need the cash for drugs and hookers, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 18:48, closed)

Yes
Also, 'pacifically'.

And apostrophe's on plural's.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 18:50, closed)

I see what you did there...

( snee held his breath since, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:07, closed)

I also wish fewer people would use the word 'less' when they mean 'fewer'.

Wankers.
(jabberwocky, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 18:53, closed)

Five items or less
less what? Coherent?
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 19:23, closed)

Capital letters
also exist for a reason.
(Petite chien is going to do science to it, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 19:20, closed)

indeed
Consider, if you will, the difference between these two lines:


I helped my Uncle Jack off a horse

I helped my uncle jack off a horse
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 19:26, closed)

Sicko
!
( stopmeandslapme Cometh the hour, cometh your mum, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 19:54, closed)

Yeah.
There grammer is just shit lol.



*giggles*
(Scritty Bakerman., Sun 4 Apr 2010, 20:35, closed)

to
to, two and too
(whiskas loved by 8 out of 10 cats, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 20:20, closed)

Definately.

( john3ners has relocated to the Highlands, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 21:54, closed)

Aaaaaaaaaaargh!!!!!
Cunts, the lot of 'em!!!!
(nonstopdancer, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 8:50, closed)

Well, I do see your point.
But to quote a certain bloke who was quite light-of-foot on the old water- "Don't try and help a person with a speck of dust in your eye until you can see past the plank of wood in yours".
( jim_bob can herd cats., Fri 2 Apr 2010, 22:11, closed)

More random...
...but there are also three words - 'peek', 'peak' and 'pique' - none of which remotely overlap. And this board's not the only place I see people fucking that up.
(Falstaff's Spiritual Successor, Fri 2 Apr 2010, 22:14, closed)

Agreed
They're is no reason for it.
(Eeevil You are losers, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 2:27, closed)

'Should of' instead of 'should have'
I keep seeing 'should of' instead of 'should have' - sometimes in the more august broadsheets. If they won't defend proper grammar, who will?
(Goes back to growling into the Telegraph)
(reinvented, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 8:08, closed)

anybody who replaces
have with of after a modal should have all genitals severed/mutilated by a rusty-chainsaw-wielding spacker.

I used to teach this to children - anybody who used of instead of have was sent into the babies classroom, and made to sing and dance (for everyone's amusement - an english academy where the walls were all made of glass)
(bamboozled Can hear you getting fatter, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 11:24, closed)

You should really capitalise "I"

(thefuckestuppest cheapened this, on, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 10:37, closed)

He should put his own grammatical house in order.
Once he has this sorted, then he can lob bricks covered in the flaming pages of the OED.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Sat 3 Apr 2010, 14:20, closed)

and Your You're and, I guess, Yore.
(BigAndyBee, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 15:23, closed)

Bit late in the game,
but there's one common misspelling of a particular word that makes me loose my mind.
( Pretender, Sun 4 Apr 2010, 14:56, closed)

Well...
Are you gonna let lose with the word then?




Oh this is fun...
( snee held his breath since, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:09, closed)

que?
gotta be the misuse of cue/que/queue!
(twiceydrinker hmmm is it pint time?, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:17, closed)

Their, The`re
it`s goin` to be awl riiiiight
(Sadarse works like Mist condensing mud flaps, Mon 5 Apr 2010, 2:04, closed)