As someone who really likes STV but doesn't really like AV I'll point out this concern of my that this is as close it's going to get to changing it to something near proportional for a long time.
That is a bet but I will be surprised if this question occurs again - if it fails or succeeds. Only if it wins can I forsee any other debate on changing the vote including something like AV+ which to my recollection was something that Labour investigated and promptly forgot about.
A 'no' result will be held up as the reason not to change anything for at least the next 30 years, it will be treated as vote for the status quo rather than a vote against AV. If you want reformation of the voting system you have to vote yes in this referendum - even if you think AV is a shitty halfway house - to have any chance of ever getting to a better system in your lifetime.
Vote YES to AV on May 5th!
(Wasp Boxlike a nervous random stranger at a glory hole,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 17:07,
archived)
I think since his party are the majority in it, he has every right to try to do that.
I'll admit I admire how it's been worked out, to make the potential change slightly more preferable to the conservatives but they still fight against it.
Doesn't the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem say that all voting systems are equally shitty, though?
I mean I'm paraphrasing but I'm pretty sure that's what it says.
(_Felix's school of dance and occult sciences,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 18:43,
archived)
I'd agree that it's not an ideal solution - AV+ would certainly be a bit more proportional.
But it's the only thing on the table at the moment so I'm voting yes.
(benito vaselinino not that one,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 17:20,
archived)
Yup, if anything it will force parties to appeal to the middle ground more and explain their policies more clearly. I hope it will lead to a more grown up age of politics where common sense rules without people lurching to the left or right.
I think reform needs to go deeper though. I'd like to see a ban on party whips and every vote being a free vote, and any poltician found guilty of lying to the house, spin doctoring or patronising the electorate to be forced to wear a hat made of poos.
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 16:57,
archived)
I still don't understand it, but I got an advertisement for the Yes campaign the other day
with lots of celebrities endorsing the Yes vote.
My only conclusion so far is that implying I am that stupid that I will be swayed by what Eddie fucking Izzard thinks of a political issue is offensive.
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 16:57,
archived)
David Cameron has said it's "unBritish"
so it gets my vote. That's not even a word!
(RobuttTwo pearls in a cashmere sky,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 17:00,
archived)
Also, it's downright unAmerican.
(drimblehe'd been white, he'd been black,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 17:18,
archived)
I received an 'openable' postcard the other Day with my full name emblazoned across the front in big and bright letters
upon opening, I find the grinning and slack-jawed mush of one E. Miliband Esq. gawping back at me wanting to know my priorities. I may reply with 'for starters, not having my full name and details emblazoned across post in big and bright letters'
(The Great Architectis still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Tue 5 Apr 2011, 17:04,
archived)