b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10547671 (Thread)

# shitty fucking magnets
(I helped save b3ta! amoebaboy chose for death by unga bunga on, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:28, archived)
# how the fuck do they work?
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:29, archived)
# me again
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM&feature=player_embedded#!
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:30, archived)
# ffs,
should have asked him why ice is slippy - then maybe he'd have explained how magnets work
(I helped save b3ta! 4Q just lurking, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:36, archived)
# or rubber bands.
sloppy journalism
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:40, archived)
# i started my physics degree in 1998 and i'm still in physics
and frankly the best answer i can give is "they just fucking DO all right?" i could bang on about magnetic fields just being electric fields under a lorentz boost, but that just bounces the question onto "how the fuck does an electric field work?", to which my response is "they just fucking DO all right?" (or banging on about the exchange of virtual photons between electrons and protons, which helps no-one)
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:31, archived)
# ^this^
(I helped save b3ta! amoebaboy chose for death by unga bunga on, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:32, archived)
# Fucking shitty neutrinos!
(I helped save b3ta! DogHorse plop, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:36, archived)
# FUCKING SHITTY NEUTRINOS
Little bastards swan around for FIFTY FUCKING YEARS pretending to be totally massless but, oh no, the hussies were hiding little pot bellies. Less than an electron volt between the three of them but oh, that's enough. Enough for them to change flavour between the Sun and the Earth. Filthy liars. FILTHY TRANSGENDER FUCKING LIARS. And suddenly the Standard Model's dead, isn't it? Little fucking bastards. Fucking shitty bints. And now we find that there are probably STERILE FUCKING NEUTRINOS polluting everything! Fucking shitty massive sterile neutrinos. CUNTS. At least one species of them. Perhaps more. FUCKING SHITTY CUNTS.

And now. Oh, NOW! Breaking the speed limit, are they? While being fucking massive?

WHO THE FUCK DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:41, archived)
# cunts
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:44, archived)
# CUNTS
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:49, archived)
# cunts
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:59, archived)
# Calm down dear, it's just a subatomicparticle
and has yet to complete peer review. Probably just some factor they didn't take into account during the experiment that buggered up readings.
(I helped save b3ta! Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:45, archived)
# Haha
The stuff about sterile neutrinos is still only suggestive, too. The rest of it's true -- neutrinos have a small, but non-zero mass (or, at least, the sum of the masses of the three types of neutrino is non-zero so *at least one type of neutrino* has a mass), and that fucks up the standard model right away. This is a good thing because it means we may all still be employed in twenty years time. Well, those of us who are physicists, anyway.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:50, archived)
# If these faster than light neutrinos turn out to be true
you can pretend you believed in string theory all along.
(I helped save b3ta! Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:15, archived)
# I'd be more convinced if it had been a clear prediction of string theory
I'd be more convinced of someone finding a way of showing it from standard QM field theory. There's actually no requirement for a massless quantum particle to travel at the speed of light - that's a classical notion. (And there isn't even the requirement in general relativity for massless particles to travel at the speed of light except over very small distances, but that's getting very fiddly pedantic.) Of course, doing that might be a lot trickier. Me, I just work in classical physics at the minute so I'll leave that to everyone else :)
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:33, archived)
# neutrinos innit
don't give a shit
it's like "LOL RULES"

"LOL, CALL THAT A MASS"

and they just stick their fingers up and are all BLBMLMGLGMLGMLG!!

I bet they get pissed up and do freaky orbits around themselves just because it's mental

/hasn't got a shitting clue about physics blog
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:45, archived)
# And they have no idea who Chuck Norris is and just whizz right through him
Billions at a time. No idea at all. And Chuck Norris can't catch them.
(I helped save b3ta! Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:48, archived)
# the more he tightens his grip, the more they slip through his fingers, and his rest of him
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:50, archived)
# YEAH
Fucking neutrinos. I'll give them fucking "radiative species". CUNTS.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:50, archived)
# cunt them in the fuck!
then bastard them in the face!
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:56, archived)
# I intend to
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:56, archived)
# So how does gravity work?
And how do we make antigravity? (that's antigravity, not auntie gravy tea)
(I helped save b3ta! Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:43, archived)
# damn!
*puts away aunties gravy tea recipe*
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:45, archived)
# My auntie used to make a particular special tea like watery gravy
/random childhood memory

edit: also, she had a habit of calling any soft drink pop

fucking hell, crap orange diluted, it's not pop.

/random childhood trauma
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:45, archived)
# Ah, now, that ones *much* easier
At macroscopic scales, by which I mean about 10 micrometres and above, gravity is from all experiment and appearances a fictional force. A fictional force is one that imparts the same acceleration on everything -- the most commonly-encountered example is centrifugal force which, no matter what your high-school physics teacher told you, most definitely exists. It's just that it only exists in a rotating frame of reference. Next time you go around a corner in a car, watch your pen and your wallet on the dashboard, if you're silly enough to put them there. They go skittering across at exactly the same rate (as would you if you weren't belted in). Centrifugal force is a fake force, which manifests in a non-trivial frame of reference. And if you remember simple experiments, a pebble and a lead weight fall at the same speed... gravity is totally fictional.

If you follow this through, it's pretty quick to find that gravity can only be explained (*assuming that space and time are both continuous*) as a manifestation of spacetime curvature. A mass distorts the spacetime around it, changing the path that a freely-moving body experiences. So what to us feels like being pressed down to Earth is just our bodies attempting to move in a straight line that happens to be towards the centre of the Earth -- the same as when a train starts movign before you've sat down, you go flying towards the back of the carriage.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:49, archived)
# So it's like magic, then?
Or like what Jedis use?
(I helped save b3ta! Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:51, archived)
# sounds to me like god did it
intelligently :)
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:53, archived)
# magic man
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:54, archived)
# More like magic
If by "magic" you mean "differential geometry and clear physical reasoning".

I realised I forgot to say about anti-gravity. If you can find me a type of fluid that has a very negative pressure, I can give you anti-gravity. Otherwise you'd have to find me some gravitons with an opposite "charge", and I'm not entirely sure I could formulate a sensible theory of gravity that included them.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:55, archived)
# cern are on the phone
can you sort 'em out?
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:53, archived)
# Nah
I know a few people who work at CERN. They're way better at particle physics than I'll ever be.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:53, archived)
# why does a match burst into flame when dragged across a rough surface?
why does space have three dimensions?
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:57, archived)
# why is the moon?
THESE QUESTIONS NEED ANSWERS
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:00, archived)
# what is an electron?
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:00, archived)
# how many roads must a man walk down?
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:01, archived)
# happy to help
electron

innit.
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:03, archived)
# what is love?
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:03, archived)
# can you feel it?
(I helped save b3ta! artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:05, archived)
# Baby, don't hurt me
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:12, archived)
# And how IS babby formed?
(I helped save b3ta! Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:16, archived)
# Storks
Or is it stalks? One or the other. Both, sometimes.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:22, archived)
# 1) Modern matches don't, they have to be dragged across the appropriate surface
which contains half the chemicals required for the reaction. (Which requires an input of heat, which is why you had to drag old-style matches across a rough surface - the friction put heat into the match head and started the reaction.)

2) Tricky. Basically, because it does. If you believe in string theory it actually has about 10 of the fuckers, but we can only access three, because we are, for more or less accidental reasons, stuck onto a 3d sheet hanging in 10d space. There are also apparently various theorems in differential geometry that only really work very well in 3 spatial (and 1 temporal) dimensions but I don't know about that. Also, neither gravity nor chemistry wouldn't work very well in 2d, and more than 3 is a bit wasteful. My guess is that that's the best answer.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:00, archived)
# I personally agree with roger penrose on string theory
it seems a bit too convoluted too me
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:03, archived)
# To give a serious reply
I agree. It's worse than that, too. String theory is all well and good, but it's "background dependant", which means that if I want to be in vacuum I put that in by hand, while if I want to be near a planet i have to put *that* in by hand. That's a total deal-breaker for a theory of gravity. Ever since general relativity we've grown accustomed to theories of gravity that are "background-independant" -- when the theory itself can determine the nature of the spacetime around it.

For me that's extremely important. Why replace something that works with something that, no disrespect meant, doesn't?

Worse than that, even, is that there are, as yet, zero testable predictions from string theory. One of the only reliable predictions a string theorist has ever made is that there are ten to the motherfucking 150 or more valid vacua. This is rather euphemistically known as the "string landscape". In other worlds it's known as "having your cake and eating 10 to the fucking 150 times as much as you have". It's no wonder string theory can reproduce (at a perturbative - ie, incomplete and unsatisfactory, level) the standard model of particle physics plus gravity, if it can also reproduce ten to the fucking 150 other universes.

Put another way, modern physics is built on symmetries. The standard model is something like U(1)xSU(2)xSO(3) or something like that; I forget. Different string theories use different groups, but the most common that I'm aware of is entertainingly known as "heterotic" string theory - E8xE8. E8 is a group that contains U(1)xSU(2)xSO(3), and much more, inside it. So if you square the fucker of course you'll find the symmetries of the real unvierse in it. And plenty besides.

Basically, it's a theory with zero predictive power. Mathematically it's really very beautiful, and even aesthetically it's very nice - even from a physical point of view. It's a lovely idea, taking a vacuum background and having different vibrations on some strings giving us the whole of physics. But the way it's gone, it can explain anything you want it to - meaning that, beautiful maths or not, it's not physics.

At least, that's my opinion, but since i know very little more about string theory than you, it probably isn't worth all that much.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:10, archived)
# Yes!
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:26, archived)
# Haha
I do get the impression I'm being trolled a bit, but I like mouthing off about it because I've been mildly irritated by string theorists (and supersymmetry people) for a good few years now :)
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:28, archived)
# no I agree
Brian cox annoys me more though, saying the heat death of the universe is how the universe WILL end as fact, when there are so many unanswered questions.
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:42, archived)
# There are so many unanswered questions
I've spent a lot of my career looking at the assumptions of cosmology. Basically we assume
* gravity is metric
* the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on average
* the theory of gravity is general relativity

assumption (1) is more or less safe, on the scales we're working on. assumption (3) may as well be kept for the minute because we've got nothing that good to replace it with, although there are plenty of things done in cosmology to do with this. assumption (2) is simply downright wrong. firstly, "on average" is meaningless without defining an average... and we can't do that in general relativity. (well, we may finally be able to, but the jury's still currently out and in any event no work has been done on it.) secondly, while the universe "on average" may be both homogeneous and isotropic, it certainly isn't locally, or we wouldn't exist and neither would the planet, the suns, the galaxy, the local group, the local cluster or even the local supercluster. pretending that all that doesn't exist was a superb approximation for a very long time but observation is now finally catching up with theory in cosmology... and it may well be breaking down.

or it may not. that's the joy of unanswered questions. the standard model of cosmology might be totally right, as unpleasant a prospect as that seems. or it might be very wrong.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:49, archived)
# i think i killed the conversation
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:20, archived)
# I was going to ask what you think of the heat death of the universe theory
whether or not everything will just decay away and we'll be left with absolute nothingness, i mean we haven't seen a proton decay
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:27, archived)
# aha
that was implicitly contained in the "standard model of the universe" bit. for that to happen, the standard model of cosmology has to be more or less accurate. (it probably is, to be honest, but there are plenty of loopholes and things that simply don't seem to make total sense.) basically the idea is that everything will end up with radiation - in the end stars will have processed almost everything that can be processed and black holes swallowed everything else and the few things left over will have decayed, and then eventually the black holes themselves will decay in hawking radiation. it seems very possible that every fundamental particle is unstable, and most if not all theories that combine the strong and electroweak forces predict that; i'm willing to believe it, to be honest, although the half-lives may be of the order of tens of billions of years, or more. given a standard cosmology, and all of that, the "heat death" seems inevitable. unless you can find a way of changing the laws of thermodynamics, and of gravity, it's hard to avoid.

except that the standard model of cosmology may be quite wrong. we may not even understand hawking radiation, although we may observe an analogue of it in the next year or two. (any quantum radiation from any kind of horizon will go a long way to justifying the argument for hawking radiation - although naturally it won't prove it. there are groups have now made acoustic black holes, which are like real black holes but for sound waves, and in a couple of years we should be in a position to measure the hawking radiation, if it exists. i'll be stunned if it doesn't.) fundamental particles may not decay. like you say, proton decay has never been observed. the universe might collapse on itself. physics we have absolutely no idea about could come into force when the universe grows too big - or if it contracts to too small a scale. the whole thing could be based on physics that is accurate on local scales but applied very badly on cosmological scales.

my view is that all bets are off in cosmology right now. at the heart of it, we don't understand what's going on - just how it looks when we interpret it using a particular model. there's a fuckload of observational support for that model, but even so... it's just a model. phenomenology, to use the jargon.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:41, archived)
# also
in case anyone wanted MORE walls of text from me tonight (i think i'm now on a dozen ignore lists), this is where penrose's recent news stories have come from. penrose has a theory, which hasn't been satisfactorily published but which actually is quite elegant in principle, where you map the heat death of the universe onto the start of another. the details are a bit... detailed, but it boils down to looping future infinity onto past infinity, and being able to do so because the only things left in the universe are photons which for some reason i've never understood because he's not written a proper paper about this that i've ever seen means that there's no firm definitions of distance. so the massive distances at the end of the universe apparently can be mapped onto tiny distances in the very early universe. the heat death leads to a new big bang, new universes, and yet more physicists to evolve and ask WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THE ENTROPY?

oh, and also for respected physicists to work it out and then put out ill-advised papers based on statistics they readily admit they don't understand, which promptly get rubbished by the rest of the community.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:47, archived)
# actually i think i'm being as clear as mud
i could probably explain all this a bit more comprehensibly
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:49, archived)
# is that where suggested the concentric rings on the wmap image were left over gravitational waves?
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:50, archived)
# Yep
They never actually explained where the concentric rings were meant to have come from, and they used some really weird statistics where they compared everything with white noise rather than with simulated maps. That's like looking for discrepancies in a recording of a Beatles track by comparing it with white noise rather than a reasonably precise cover version. Or like looking for yellow blocks in a field of blue instead of a field of random colour. The papers were not well received - which isn't entirely Penrose's fault; he's never pretended to be an observational cosmologist nor a statistician.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:54, archived)
# what if the universe is not a closed system and entropy could be leaked in?
if that makes sense
i drew a horse
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:48, archived)
# Then all bets are off, depending on how you define "universe"
For us, it basically just means "everything", so by definition entropy can't come into it from outside, and neither can heat nor anything else. What we see might just be a tiny patch of it, but what we attempt to describe is everything. (We'd term something we can't see as "superhorizon" - our metaphors are still kind of stuck in the 15th century.) Cosmology depends on superhorizon scales, but you can get some seriously interesting stuff going on if you play around. Topology is a nice example. General relativity is lovely and all, but it says *nothing* about how the world looks as a whole; it's entirely possible that's doughnut shaped, or like a football, or like any crazy shape you can imagine, perhaps like a loaf of bread that someone drilled repeated holes into. Each model can easily describe our actual universe and all our observations, but each have extremely different behaviour.

So basically if you start taking stuff outside the observational universe seriously, a lot of things can happen.

Plus, I've never been able to draw horses :( I basically can't even draw :(
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 23:58, archived)
# I have enjoyed reading this.
informative informed opinions.
(I helped save b3ta! arrangedletters, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 0:13, archived)
# I would quite like to have a physicist on speedial
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 0:17, archived)
# i'm not quite on speeddial
but i'm on b3ta quite a bit and normally willing to offer my opinionated opinions

edit: i also enjoy this kind of thing :)
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 0:19, archived)
# hah excellent can't beat a good chat about physics
Edit: i do have some questions about dark energy, but its too late
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 0:30, archived)
# I don't think that one does...
Any more...
(I helped save b3ta! Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:32, archived)
# I love you! You should like... marry a bunch of people!


Here also is some magnet porn


(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:33, archived)
# Is that a piece of Battenberg?
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:33, archived)
# it's two magnets fluxing innit
FILTH
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:34, archived)
# oh my god
have they no shame?
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:36, archived)
# it's ok though
each one of their virtual photons is encased in rubber before they exchange them
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:37, archived)
# Have to be damned good rubber
The Vatican informs me that even AIDS is small enough to slip through rubber johnnies. Lord alone knows how many photons get through.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:43, archived)
# it's not enough that catholic priests have to pump choirboys full of piety fluid
they also have to bombard them with unsealed photons.

WHERE WILL THE MADNESS END!
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:47, archived)
# Well, I know where it won't end
with the Vatican admitting that Irish priests molest their choirboys.

Unless it already has. In which case I take it back.
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:51, archived)
# the irish gov took the unusual step of saying publicly "WHAT THE FUCK!!!"
which is pretty serious I guess :)
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:54, archived)
# I was quite happy about that :)
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:57, archived)
# I was somewhat amazed
I guess some top folkies there have had actual reports of everything that's been reported handed to them

no wonder they're pissed
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:00, archived)
# i guess
from what i understood the vatican actually did change their stance slightly - perhaps they got handed some of it as well...
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:02, archived)
# yeah
"gods" love, yeah...

fucked up pile of fuckedupness
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:04, archived)
# fluxing 'ell
(I helped save b3ta! Rebel biscuit stercore sumus et nos esse novimus, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:38, archived)
# they can't stop
because it fields so good!
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:38, archived)
# ha ha ha ha ha !
Yes !!!
(I helped save b3ta! amoebaboy chose for death by unga bunga on, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:34, archived)
# we should have a threadrush of magnets
\o/
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:37, archived)
# yay !
(I helped save b3ta! amoebaboy chose for death by unga bunga on, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:42, archived)
# now yer cookin!
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:48, archived)
#
(I helped save b3ta! Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 0:16, archived)
# hahahaha
(I helped save b3ta! h3donist tryin' to play me out as if my name is Sega.., Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:37, archived)
# They could use one cup
(Monocromatico Lady Godiva's horse, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:39, archived)
# by the way, how rude of me
duly clicked
(I helped save b3ta! boris the spider, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:34, archived)
# ha ha :)
(I helped save b3ta! The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:34, archived)
# hahahah!
(I helped save b3ta! Wildyles is back to rimming chimps, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:36, archived)
# Good Job!
(I helped save b3ta! atomic A-bomb-a-nation, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:38, archived)
# POW!
Right in the pole.
(I helped save b3ta! DogHorse plop, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:39, archived)
# Splatalite lols
Hurray
(I helped save b3ta! Cassius Kray floats like a butterfly, stings like a trout, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 21:45, archived)
# yay!
(I helped save b3ta! Mousing, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 22:04, archived)