
What gifts should I prepare for my girlfriend on this christmas day.
I want to buy one such clothes to her, looks very stylish, very sexy
dig.la/6b
I do not know
Is this dress suitable for 18 year old girl?

Are these drinks suitable for a retard called fiiminglee?




( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 7:02,
archived)





I've emailed Rob to ask him to ban this user and once again coined the idea of a more sturdy signup process
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 7:15,
archived)

...makes it sound like you would have to fight a dog or something.
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 9:58,
archived)


I which case I wouldn't be as worried about the dress being suitable as you being suitable!
Now kindly fuck off!
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 7:16,
archived)
Now kindly fuck off!


You are all responding to one of these guys:
www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27357/?p1=blogs
Stop it.
Summary (courtesy of Slashdot.org)
it.slashdot.org/story/11/11/23/0050243/internet-water-army-on-the-march
"They discovered that paid posters tend to post more new comments than replies to other comments. They also post more often with 50 per cent of them posting every 2.5 minutes on average. They also move on from a discussion more quickly than legitimate users, discarding their IDs and never using them again. What's more, the content they post is measurably different. These workers are paid by the volume and so often take shortcuts, cutting and pasting the same content many times. This would normally invalidate their posts but only if it is spotted by the quality control team. So Cheng and co built some software to look for repetitions and similarities in messages as well as the other behaviors they'd identified. They then tested it on the dataset they'd downloaded from Sina and Sohu and found it to be remarkably good, with an accuracy of 88 per cent in spotting paid posters."
The OP doesn't care what you say.
Cheers.
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 8:39,
archived)
www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27357/?p1=blogs
Stop it.
Summary (courtesy of Slashdot.org)
it.slashdot.org/story/11/11/23/0050243/internet-water-army-on-the-march
"They discovered that paid posters tend to post more new comments than replies to other comments. They also post more often with 50 per cent of them posting every 2.5 minutes on average. They also move on from a discussion more quickly than legitimate users, discarding their IDs and never using them again. What's more, the content they post is measurably different. These workers are paid by the volume and so often take shortcuts, cutting and pasting the same content many times. This would normally invalidate their posts but only if it is spotted by the quality control team. So Cheng and co built some software to look for repetitions and similarities in messages as well as the other behaviors they'd identified. They then tested it on the dataset they'd downloaded from Sina and Sohu and found it to be remarkably good, with an accuracy of 88 per cent in spotting paid posters."
The OP doesn't care what you say.
Cheers.


Of course that would have excluded Jessie at one point.
Censorship's a bitch.
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 9:17,
archived)
Censorship's a bitch.

Shutting down Asia isn't the way to go I think, though if Rob really wanted to make b3ta Britain uber alles, that's up to him of course.
( ,
Fri 25 Nov 2011, 9:26,
archived)