b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9151548 (Thread)

# Evenin' all. I know it's not RPS, but what do you think to the image I'm thinking of for the frontpage of my new website?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:09, archived)
# No its gay
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:10, archived)
# Nah I dunno its ok I guess honestly I havnt looked at it really
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
# Having looked at it I think it might be a bit dull
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
# T.J. Surgeons remove healthy kidney through donor's vagina
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:24, archived)
# poor bloke
having a vagina grafted just for that op. ouch
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:26, archived)
# I'd like to see them remove the donor through the donor's vagina
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:27, archived)
# Liposuction....
* Remove the fat through a Donna Kebab's twunt
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:29, archived)
# They'll remove a healthy brain through a man's anus next.

I've already got tickets.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:30, archived)
# lol I read that as "rickets" :D
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:32, archived)
# Pfft
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:41, archived)
# I like the:
DONT MISS:
Extreme multiple births carry tremendous risks

At the side
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:30, archived)
# A FULLY FUNCTIONING CUNT ON A HERON'S BACK
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:36, archived)
# you made me lol
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:51, archived)
# you say it's fully functional, but how can I be sure?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 22:04, archived)
# Ah, fair enough then.
Seems to be the general consensus; If I use the image I'll stick with the original high-contrast one.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:26, archived)
# Or add bits
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:28, archived)
# hahaha
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:29, archived)
# hahahaaha aceness!~
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:30, archived)
# Haha, brilliant!
Unexpected Stormtrooper!
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:31, archived)
# - I like the font
- I don't generally like low contrast images
- B&W: arty or just shitty? Depends on the website, I suppose

/discuss
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
#
tubgirl or goatse

/disgusting
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:14, archived)
# I was always more of a tubgirl person

that or lemonparty
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:15, archived)
# Ah well, it's just a first go anyway.
I'm just bandying around some ideas before I stick anything proper up.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:16, archived)
# as the bishop said to the actress
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
# Low contrast won't let you use a salmon background
only black or white.

Now is that what you really want? No. You want salmon.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
# teal
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:37, archived)
# Ooooh
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:43, archived)
# I would have one of the leaves slightly coloured

then again I wouldn't have one picture on the front page
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
# Frontpage?
Don't have a splash page!
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
# I like websites where you have to click on the door of their building to continue.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:12, archived)
# hahaha
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
# I really do
Whenever I stumble upon one, I send a link out to all my geek friends colleagues.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:21, archived)
# can I get on this mailing list please?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:22, archived)
# Haha sure.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:42, archived)
# they're best if they have lines that
zoom around and merge and change for a minute or two before you can look at the site.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:34, archived)
# YES
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:42, archived)
# also a very slowly loading flash only scrollable photograph
that is a single file of 2mb

that has little scroll bars on the bottom of the image to move to different sections of it

very s l o w l y

those a great too!
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:51, archived)
# They're only great if you can't skip them
And just when you show something interesting in the flash movie, the page reloads itself to a second one.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 22:19, archived)
# Heh, is that a general no-no?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:13, archived)
# It wasn't in 1997.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:13, archived)
# I think so.
people want to see a variety of images and they do not really browse sites, per-se, they mostly follow links from search engines - you are unlikely to win many users with a page which makes them click again. This is what I do, so I am a bit anal about it.

The original image is much nicer in my humble opinion than this one. I am fond of contrast.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:15, archived)
# Good point.
I toned down the image itself so I could display the title against it, but I agree, I prefer the original. I'll make another stab at it later anyway, probably ditching the splash. Thanks for the advise!
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:19, archived)
# such things suck
"DON'T MAKE ME THINK"

"WHERE'S THE SHIT"

"I'M BORED"

etc..

and what pedantichrist said innit
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:49, archived)
# except if you are david hockney
then use your splash stuff as its the only decent art youve done
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:20, archived)
# How do you spell: S.H.I.T.E ?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
# bit dull
what's the website about then?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:11, archived)
# It's going to be my own photography website
One that's easier to show to prospective clients than a DevArt site.

Clearly it needs more work.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:14, archived)
# i like the font choice
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:20, archived)
# Odd shape for a front page splash
and the image itself is not ... well, not that exciting
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:12, archived)
# Is it a flower website?
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:12, archived)
# Too brown.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:13, archived)
# sorry dont like it
unless you are looking for trifolium or whatever foliage it is.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:13, archived)
# Needs more colour.


(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:23, archived)
#
colour
cowbell
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:30, archived)
# I think it should say
"WELCOME TO MY HOMEPAGE" and then something along the lines of "CLICK THE LINK TO ENTER MY SITE"
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:23, archived)
# HELLO AND WELCOME TO MY WEBBED SIGHTS
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:28, archived)
# Actually I feel bad now.
I should have recommended the people who did my site:
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:42, archived)
# Oh thank god it's not a RP!
Spam is much better. Is the site for cottaging? More importantly I just had a smashing curry. B3ta will be much more interested in knowing this.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:29, archived)
# mmmmmm curry
i believe curry is from the word kari which also means 'honour killing'. awkward really...
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:37, archived)
# OK in which case I had a thali.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:41, archived)
# oooh indian tapas
i had sausages. just sausages. and wine.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:48, archived)
# Is it?
Shite i got conned. I had a shoe then.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:50, archived)
# mmm shoe
brogue biryani...nom nom
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:52, archived)
# well since you asked.
The depth of field looks too forced ( as in photoshpped )
The lack of contrast makes it look too washed out.
The lack of variance in the values makes it look dull.
All in all not a picture I'd be using if it were to indicate my skills as a photographer for hire.

Thanks for the spam.
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:37, archived)
# the original images is a well a balanced photo
that shows off some good photo skills...
the edit looks washed out and relatively amateurish.

if you're trying to advertise your photoing skills use a photo that shows good photography technique, not photoshop technique.

also, don't have a splash page, they're pointless, annoying and waste of my clicking finger's energy.

just my two pence
(, Tue 3 Feb 2009, 21:38, archived)