b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9216523 (Thread)

# I was musing on how to visually define or represent the phrase 'o noes!':


EDIT: Thanks to Prodigy 69 for the grass loldrugzors.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:38, archived)
# Oh Noes!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:38, archived)
# Awwww...
I always feel really bad when I tread on a snail.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:40, archived)
# Me too
slugs however can fuck off.

Fucking arthropode tramps littering up our streets
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:40, archived)
# What did the slug say to the snail?


big issue mate?
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# I am sure the Snail's family feel worse ;)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# i used to stamp on them and kill crabs on purpose too,now i even
let little fish live :)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# Oh noes!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:40, archived)
# Oh Noes!
Needs more tread on bottom of shoe
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:40, archived)
# Yeah I thought this.
But then - after consideration - I simply couldn't be arsed.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# For your fair comment
you get my ten minute effort with TO'B's pasty pic

(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# 10 minutes?! Isn't that, like
How old Michael Winner is or something?

Oo look a pigeon!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# For your ten minute effort
You get my ironic applause gif.



In no way having a go at your post it's just that I put it together ages ago and in defiance of Barbarossa's law nobody seems to be failing at the moment.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:47, archived)
# Hehehe
That does make me giggle!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# :)
I also have a fail animation waiting to be unleashed....
'lo!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:08, archived)
# heh
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:49, archived)
# AWWWW!
TEH FLUFF!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:50, archived)
# now fast forward a few years and imagine him sinking his teefs into your skull
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:51, archived)
# Fucking let him try it the little shit.
I'd smack him like a ginger stranger's child.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:55, archived)
# Leave Clansoul Alone!
;-)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:05, archived)
# Sounds liek something
a chinaman would say

"You want more tread on bottom of shoe?"

I'm sorry...
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# Hmm
Looks like I've ordered one too many Chinese takeaways
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:44, archived)
# GO ON BARRY!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:41, archived)
# nice,ave a thread undeserving toap
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:42, archived)
# That's the whole point of t'internets, shirley?
I'm currently arguing shouting at Will Carling about wanting Cipriani in the England rugby team against Ireland. It's great
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# OMGROFL URSOGAY!!!11!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# roflcopter and,lmao to you sonny
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:50, archived)
# Oh the ironing
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:48, archived)
# Hahahahahahahahahaha
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:56, archived)
# Hahaha this.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:39, archived)
# I YAM HIDIN BEHIND AN BISKIT
slight tj: who would like to explain to me the differences between character sets (ISO8859) and Unicode?
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:43, archived)
# character sets (ISO8859) is for geeks
ladies love guys who know Unicode
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# see
am I right in thinking that ISO-8859-9 (say) is just normal standard ASCII (128) plus whatever weird characters up to 256 (8-bit) and Unicode is a shitload of characters (16-bit)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:51, archived)
# what damage would it cause
if I gave you a made up an answer?
I don't know, sorry
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:52, archived)
# Me!
If I knew
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:46, archived)
# Unicode (I think) can be parsed to any language OS
whereas specific Char Sets have to have those sets installed in order to display correctly.

In an XML-y kind of way.
Possibly.

*runs away from the nay-sayers*
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:53, archived)
# Marvellous.


(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:44, archived)
# cheers!
It's only a lunch-break job, mind!
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:49, archived)
# Woo! I was musing on how to visually define or represent the phrase "Erk!!"
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 13:54, archived)
# ERK!
Unless one is gay, presumably, in which case the reaction would be "Lush."
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:00, archived)
# I depends what it's bulging and seething with.
Boiling custard would sting the eyes, methinks.
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:17, archived)
# heh :)
wrong brush...but he looks chipper :)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2009, 14:35, archived)