EDIT having a tidy up and found an old letter from the YHA trying to threaten up with action if we persisted in calling ourselves a youth hostel on our site. It was basically hollow threat so that they'd appear above us on a websearch.
Added bonus that for some reason there was £15 in the scanner:)
(riverghostservicing your mum since,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:53,
archived)
I might be back in London this week
Ok to pop in on my way back
(Duke Otterbyyou pre-verts,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:55,
archived)
Yeah no probs.
Can't guarantee that I won't be running around like a headless chicken though:P
(riverghostservicing your mum since,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:59,
archived)
You always are sir :)
It will probably be Wednesday, in after the rush hour and back before the rush hour or after it
(Duke Otterbyyou pre-verts,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:01,
archived)
I'll have to let you know. I'm going to try and meet a make on Wednesday so I my be having the day off.
(riverghostservicing your mum since,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:07,
archived)
(riverghostservicing your mum since,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:23,
archived)
That is quite an old letter
(epiphanycoming live from sweden,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:01,
archived)
Yeah
I basically told the to bog off and that is was impossible to copywrite youth hostel. I then said that I knew some of their overpcised grottos had restaurants in them, did they own the copyright to restuarant?
It's big corporation trying to bully small independant. FFS they chare £25 a night for a 10 person dorm, no brekkie, wifi or anything. You have to pay through the nose for that.
(riverghostservicing your mum since,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:06,
archived)
I refer your client to the response given
in Arkell v. Pressdram
(Andy_RAt the third stroke, the time will be precisely,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 13:59,
archived)
There was the mission control officer, obviously very upset, and all the BBC bint on News24 could do was to keep banging on at hm about "could it have been terrorists?"
(Rocker_44(-_-) shhhhh! Is asleep on,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:53,
archived)
Hahahaha
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:44,
archived)
What I don't understand is..
The plane left Brazil at 22.30 GMT last night, and they lost contact with it at 06.00 GMT today according to the beeb and CNN. Which I reckon puts it somewhere near the Canary Islands about 8 hours into the flight. So why are they now looking for wreckage off the coast of Brazil? The time/distance doesnt tally. edit. UPDATE all the news channels are now changing their text, bbc now says lost contact at 1.30, and elsewhere it refers to a message received at 2.30. So I give up :)
(Rocker_44(-_-) shhhhh! Is asleep on,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:43,
archived)
It's fallen into a Donnie-Darko style time portal.
One of the engines will be a major plot point for someone.
(The Alchemistking of the needlessly complicated,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:43,
archived)
Maybe it went a different route?
I noticed this when we went to Las Vegas a couple of years ago - we went via Greenland. I figured that it must be because of the curvature of the earth or something.
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:43,
archived)
Coriolis forces.
Also, sea monsters.
(The Alchemistking of the needlessly complicated,
Mon 1 Jun 2009, 12:46,
archived)
What, 8 hours on a direct flight and still near the Brazilian coast? Surely not.
I suspect they lost contact much earlier than 06:00 and thought it was just a transponder failure and didn't raise the alarm.