![Challenge Entry: Inappropriate TV Product Placement [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the Inappropriate TV Product Placement challenge. See all 374 entries (closed)
( , Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:02, archived)

Is there something else in that picture? Everything else other than the centre is being blurred by my peripheral vision.
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:04,
archived)

Is she still on the show?
And di anyone else see the OUTRAGE that the new carol's dress caused this week?
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:04,
archived)
And di anyone else see the OUTRAGE that the new carol's dress caused this week?

She giggles at anything that could be remotely construed as dirty, I was sitting in the audience for an early taping and the letters R-I-M came out as the first three, she tried to stifle a giggle, happened to catch my eye in the audience doing the same and she proceeded to giggle through the next 4 letters and it had to be re-shot.
Best thing was nobody else in the room could understand why she was giggling at RIM!
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 11:49,
archived)
Best thing was nobody else in the room could understand why she was giggling at RIM!

Why do semi-attractive 30 something women insist on dressing like that?!
Oh I know, I'll go for the see through granny top, racily unbuttoned 3 foot down to my non-existent cleavage. Oh and a blue bra should cap it off nicely.
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:04,
archived)
Oh I know, I'll go for the see through granny top, racily unbuttoned 3 foot down to my non-existent cleavage. Oh and a blue bra should cap it off nicely.

I hadn't even noticed until you said
*notices*
Has any one de-rised this beautiful image yet?
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:35,
archived)
*notices*
Has any one de-rised this beautiful image yet?

Have we slept together? Kids?
We're not ...
We're not married, are we?
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:11,
archived)
We're not ...
We're not married, are we?

I have people tailor for me, not tailor for them!
Dear gods, Sir - what are you implying?
( ,
Thu 24 Sep 2009, 9:12,
archived)
Dear gods, Sir - what are you implying?

if there has, then it'll be that.
