![This is a link post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I could watch this for hours. Possibly.
( , Mon 6 Oct 2008, 22:57, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
never wanted to
what am i to do
i cant help it...
(depends how far close to the tip-over point they are set ide imagine)
( , Tue 7 Oct 2008, 0:50, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Lateral force created by the hammer is a simple f=mv. Downward force is a function of gravity. Reduce the gravity and I'm pretty certain the machines would tip.
Analogously, if these were on the surface of Jupiter I'd imagine they wouldn't even tremble.
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 14:20, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Wouldn't even STAND on Jupiter.
timbo (poking his *** with a toothpick)
( , Sun 12 Oct 2008, 13:42, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's also gravity what accelerates the hammers. If dropped from the same position, they'll hit the board with less momentum.
( , Mon 13 Oct 2008, 3:32, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The gravitational force pulling the hammer down would be weaker, thus the momentum of the hammer would be less on the moon than on earth. As a result, the wood would receive a lower lateral push. The gravity holding the base down would, correspondingly, be weaker, so the wood would move just as far as on earth. It would just take longer.
On jupiter, the gravitational force would be so large that I imagine the wood would split with the vicious thump from the hammer. If the wood was theoretically strong enough, it would move in the same way, only much much faster.
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 16:26, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I agree. The only force both trying to upset the equilibrium and keeping it in place is gravity. If perhaps it was a spring pulled back to hit it, then it would probably fall over on the moon.
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 22:03, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The wood has a large surface area, and therefore considerable drag through the air, which will limit the amount of forward movement when the hammer hits, the atmosphere is very much thinner on the moon, so the effect of the surface area on the wood will be very minimal, thus it may fall over.
( , Tue 14 Oct 2008, 0:35, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
when littlebigplanet comes out soon. :)
( , Tue 7 Oct 2008, 1:36, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But judging from the setting, that looks like Ort, which is like art but a lot more pretentious and a much more pointless.
Maybe I've taken the wrong end of the stick here though.
( , Wed 8 Oct 2008, 1:38, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
What the hell, you just defined art.
I like it, btw.
( , Wed 8 Oct 2008, 15:18, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
They don't come remotely close to falling over
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 15:51, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
No, they don't come close to falling over. But this may explain the strange bumps in the night I've been hearing of late.
Imagine living next door to this bloke as he worked it out!
( , Sat 11 Oct 2008, 2:35, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
... I laffed out loud at the chap's name.
Can't-Topple-loss.
Well. Made me smile.
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 16:24, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Why would somebody go to the trouble of making something NEARLY fall over?
It's just so random!
( , Fri 10 Oct 2008, 17:46, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...the area of wood that the hammer is impacting on becomes flattened so much that the centre of gravity changes slightly but enough, ultimately leading to there being more weight on the "outside"?
Silly question really.
Or is it?
( , Sat 11 Oct 2008, 2:32, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Any b3tans near this that could stealthily attach exploding caps?
( , Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:58, Reply)