
This is a Greenpeace video. You will* love it. Please applaud with 'likes', as it deserves many.
[edit] *not all of you
( , Wed 20 May 2009, 23:54, Reply)

are the sort of people whom have never had to worry about having enough rice to feed their family. If they were like the majority of the world and the alternative was starvation rather than just not beeing cool, im sure they wouldnt oppose it so much
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:08, Reply)

Let's just put a huge chunk of our food supply completely in the hands of one big company and trust them with it. Being cool isn't everything.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:14, Reply)

Job done.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:58, Reply)

anyway, clubbing seals is easier.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 8:53, Reply)

Am I the only person who thinks they're awesome?
An entire food source that due to GM:
- Is Easier to grow
- Is Easier to harvest
- Is Easier to cook
- Requires less nutrients
and people are worried about product testing? It's rice for fucks sake!?
How many ways can you get it wrong?
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:25, Reply)

i don't like the fact that they sell it sterilised.
you've got the great wheat seed that will grow in poor arable, drought conditions etc. and it won't germinate.
So you have to keep buying it every harvest rather than keepign a portion back and sowing the seeds.
I think it should be like Medicines, where you get X amount of years to make money of your product then anyone can make a generic version, i.e one that does the same as Brand X but germinates too.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:36, Reply)

generations of the crop doing a Day of the Triffids and killing us all (or just not being as good/productive in the same way that F2 hybrids are nowhere near as good/reliable as F1 hybrids; amateur gardeners are used to buying new F1 seeds every year instead of sowing seeds from last year's crop)
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:57, Reply)

they are just another variation of the (four letter) DNA alphabet; you don't grow gills from eating fish DNA etc.
They are only harmful if that DNA instructs the organism to make toxins or does not breed true (i.e. subsequent generations of the organism are toxic), both of which can happen (and has happened) with conventionally bred organisms.
The reasonable objections are to do with GMOs not living up to the hype or concerns about big agribusiness, monocultures (no biodiversity & superbugs or superweeds), and patents/IP etc.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:42, Reply)

would rather draw your attention to the fact that GM Rice has a designation and not a name.
Playing off the fear of e-numbers, most of which are perfectly harmless as well, just being a way of catagorising common ingredients in foodstuffs.
The sterile crops and patent stuff is a little bit dubious, but as long as greenpeace continues to try and hit at mass hysteria I will continue to consider them as twats.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:45, Reply)

General Motors is making food now, I guess with the car biz going down they have to find something to keep their credit/finance wing company.
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 18:14, Reply)

IT MUST BE BAD
And the company makes weedkiller in order to increase rice yield and then makes the rice resistant to it? HOW DARE THEY!
I know, let's fuel the country entirely off wind power, as well! That'll work!
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:33, Reply)

( , Thu 21 May 2009, 0:46, Reply)

www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=biohackers-brewing-new-life-forms-i-2009-05-12
Scientific American so it must be true
diybio.org/
( , Thu 21 May 2009, 9:00, Reply)