Creepy!
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
Smash Monkey asks: "what's the creepiest thing you've seen, heard or felt? What has sent shivers running up your spine and skidmarks running up your undercrackers? Tell us, we'll make it all better"
( , Thu 7 Apr 2011, 13:57)
« Go Back
Blokes who get creeped out by other people's breastfeeding habits even though they have absolutely no impact on their petty little undernourished lives..
Get over yourselves, you creepy cunts.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 19:33, 41 replies)
Get over yourselves, you creepy cunts.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 19:33, 41 replies)
You have a breast feeding habit?
How many breasts are you up to a day? Do they make a patch to help you make it through the cravings?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 19:46, closed)
How many breasts are you up to a day? Do they make a patch to help you make it through the cravings?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 19:46, closed)
Someone fucking their own daughter has no impact on my life.
But I'm still creeped out by it and know it to be wrong.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:10, closed)
But I'm still creeped out by it and know it to be wrong.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:10, closed)
Yeah. Breastfeeding and incest are the same thing.
You fucking loser.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:12, closed)
You fucking loser.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:12, closed)
Yes, I'm a loser, because I think that breastfeeding can be innapropriate.
The reference to incest was just to make thick cunts like you aware that it may be morally right to question the actions of others, even though it doesn't directly affect oneself.
(EDIT: See previous posts on this QOTW for "inappropriate breastfeeding" examples -- it's not like I care if babies are breastfed in public even if I'm there.)
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:23, closed)
The reference to incest was just to make thick cunts like you aware that it may be morally right to question the actions of others, even though it doesn't directly affect oneself.
(EDIT: See previous posts on this QOTW for "inappropriate breastfeeding" examples -- it's not like I care if babies are breastfed in public even if I'm there.)
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:23, closed)
And why does it bother you
that it bothers others? I mean, I would find it creepy to see a nine year old sucking a pacifier or drinking from a baby bottle. Does that also offend you?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:21, closed)
that it bothers others? I mean, I would find it creepy to see a nine year old sucking a pacifier or drinking from a baby bottle. Does that also offend you?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:21, closed)
Oh I don't care what goes on inside their infantile little heads.
But when they drool their semi-coherent opinions on a public messageboard then I feel free to respond. Sorry if you think that's unreasonable. I should probably be banned.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:41, closed)
But when they drool their semi-coherent opinions on a public messageboard then I feel free to respond. Sorry if you think that's unreasonable. I should probably be banned.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:41, closed)
It would seem that you do in fact care what goes on in their minds, as you said that you were creeped out by them. Apparently their opinions upset you.
I happen to agree with the OP that it's creepy to continue breast feeding for an extended time, but mostly because it's encouraging a child to continue infantile behavior. The health benefits of breast feeding are pretty well diminished by that point- the kid has a working immune system by then, and is getting nutrients from other sources- so continuing to feed past the infant stage is pointless other than to fulfill some sort of need on the mother's part. I would equate it to encouraging a kid to use baby talk at home. Harmful to the kid? That would be hard to prove. Uncomfortable for those who have to witness it? Definitely. Just as much as if they were publicly picking their nose and eating the yield.
Is that a better formed thought? Does it meet with your approval?
As for the last bit- no, I don't think you should be banned, but I do think you need a little perspective and far better trolling skills. This was a rather lame attempt at a swipe, frankly, and didn't contribute anything to the QOTW other than a bit of attention seeking. Boring.
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 21:31, closed)
'The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that "Breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child... Increased duration of breastfeeding confers significant health and developmental benefits for the child and the mother... There is no upper limit to the duration of breastfeeding and no evidence of psychologic or developmental harm from breastfeeding into the third year of life or longer." (AAP 2005)'
Source: www.kellymom.com/bf/bfextended/ebf-benefits.html
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 21:41, closed)
Also, it reduces the chance of getting pregnant
which makes the WHO doubly keen to advocate its prolonged use.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 0:37, closed)
which makes the WHO doubly keen to advocate its prolonged use.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 0:37, closed)
I genuinely can't be arsed dragging myself down five intellectual levels to explain to dullwitted yet sanctimonious internet wobblers why they are wrong.
It's not as though he will even have the dignity or the maturity to accept that he's an idiot even when he has the reasons presented to him in the tiny teeny morsels that his cretinous brain can digest. Might as well let the poor prick think he's made a constructive point and then return to rutting weepily into his sofa. It's not as if sex or children are anything that are ever going to affect his life, is it? If he does manage to retch his seed into some poor twat then the mong offspring will raise itself feral in the council bins or be snatched away by social services.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 8:19, closed)
It's not as though he will even have the dignity or the maturity to accept that he's an idiot even when he has the reasons presented to him in the tiny teeny morsels that his cretinous brain can digest. Might as well let the poor prick think he's made a constructive point and then return to rutting weepily into his sofa. It's not as if sex or children are anything that are ever going to affect his life, is it? If he does manage to retch his seed into some poor twat then the mong offspring will raise itself feral in the council bins or be snatched away by social services.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 8:19, closed)
I got half way through that and gave up
people on the internet taking themselves way too seriously has that effect on me
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 1:25, closed)
people on the internet taking themselves way too seriously has that effect on me
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 1:25, closed)
agree
shows how degraded our culture has become when something as natural as feeding a baby become creepy to some 'people' (or creeps as I like to call them)
how did you manage to do that with your profile page?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:54, closed)
shows how degraded our culture has become when something as natural as feeding a baby become creepy to some 'people' (or creeps as I like to call them)
how did you manage to do that with your profile page?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 20:54, closed)
Agreed, but no-one is being creeped out by breastfeeding babies
At what age of the child does breastfeeding become creepy? And at what stage does it become creepy when a mother encourages/pressures a child either to continue or even restart breastfeeding?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 23:52, closed)
At what age of the child does breastfeeding become creepy? And at what stage does it become creepy when a mother encourages/pressures a child either to continue or even restart breastfeeding?
( , Mon 11 Apr 2011, 23:52, closed)
Ours were breastfed until 18 months and 22 months (respectively).
No-one seemed to care.
However, that group who appeared on a few TV shows where there were ten-year-olds bneing breastfed were distincly odd. That seemed far more about mothers who couldn't accept that their children were not babies any more. And the kids were little shits as well.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 0:34, closed)
No-one seemed to care.
However, that group who appeared on a few TV shows where there were ten-year-olds bneing breastfed were distincly odd. That seemed far more about mothers who couldn't accept that their children were not babies any more. And the kids were little shits as well.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 0:34, closed)
Then you are apparently strange and creepy.
Quoth wakeupandsmellthebacon: "If the child is old enough to be eating solids then I find it strange."
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 8:38, closed)
Quoth wakeupandsmellthebacon: "If the child is old enough to be eating solids then I find it strange."
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 8:38, closed)
Strange != creepy
And neither strange nor creepy according to me.
My kids weren't ready to move exclusively to solids until around 24 months, give or take. (19 months, 23 months and, due to dietary complications, 30 months).
Although I do find it both strange and creepy that you could wish a disability on a child just because you've misread his parent's opinion on something.
"... retch his seed into some poor twat then the mong offspring ..."
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:18, closed)
And neither strange nor creepy according to me.
My kids weren't ready to move exclusively to solids until around 24 months, give or take. (19 months, 23 months and, due to dietary complications, 30 months).
Although I do find it both strange and creepy that you could wish a disability on a child just because you've misread his parent's opinion on something.
"... retch his seed into some poor twat then the mong offspring ..."
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:18, closed)
What you wrote was "If the child is old enough to be eating solids then I find it strange."
If that's not what you meant then perhaps you should have written something else.
And I'm assuming the child will be pretty much guaranteed a chromosomal condition since only his mum would let him anywhere near her reproductive tract.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:22, closed)
If that's not what you meant then perhaps you should have written something else.
And I'm assuming the child will be pretty much guaranteed a chromosomal condition since only his mum would let him anywhere near her reproductive tract.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:22, closed)
I'm sorry
if my original post wasn't clear enough, but I still think it uncalled for that you wish ill on children over a disagreement with their parent.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:43, closed)
if my original post wasn't clear enough, but I still think it uncalled for that you wish ill on children over a disagreement with their parent.
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:43, closed)
Are you really trying to divert attention from the silliness of your original comment
by leaping to the defence of an entirely hypothetical and non-existent child?
Good internetting there. Do you not think a simple "oh yeah. that's not what I meant. oops" would have been a mite easier?
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:51, closed)
by leaping to the defence of an entirely hypothetical and non-existent child?
Good internetting there. Do you not think a simple "oh yeah. that's not what I meant. oops" would have been a mite easier?
( , Tue 12 Apr 2011, 9:51, closed)
« Go Back