My sexual misconception
Is that I used to think sadistically torturing your ex partner for infidelity was the preserve of fundy terrorist mullahs and similar psychotics, but apparently it's also acceptable, and hilarious to internet manchild fuckwits who think crying "reverse sexism" and "political correctness gone hurf de durf" is an acceptable argument in favor of a violent sexual offense. Yall should get lynched. Out.
(Slyph, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:25, 32 replies)

Never said it was ok
Just amusing... but seriously, lighten up. This is a site which makes jokes about child rape, mass murder and serious medical conditions for goodness sake.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:28, closed)

Quick Doc we have another pick up for the
Waaaaaaaaaahmbulance
( M o D, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:28, closed)

are
we still talking about that story with the dildo and chilli?


jeeze

edit: Slyph... fuck off
(Dan dan dan They tik urh jerbs!!!, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:31, closed)

Annnnnddddd
here we go again!

Why can't people post replys to this debate in the appropriate thread, rather than clogging up the page with their "opinions"?

To summarise: People do stupid things when they're upset.
Should she have cheated? No.
Should he have done what he did? No.
Is it rape or sexual assualt? No.
Do I give a shit? No.
(MrC. Having the most boring username on b3ta since 2004, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:31, closed)

"Temporary Insanity"
Is a defense plea, not a fucking excuse.
(Slyph, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:34, closed)

You seem to have missed the part
where I said I don't give a shit. Go to the appropriate thread and flame away to your heart's content.
(MrC. Having the most boring username on b3ta since 2004, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:39, closed)

This has been done to death now
Turn your computer off, take a deep breath and go for a walk. Seriously.
( jim_bob can herd cats., Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:39, closed)

What he said ^^^^
with nobs on.
(Reverend Fister "a disciplined fuckwit", Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:49, closed)

"Why can't people post replys to this debate in the appropriate thread, rather than clogging up the page with their "opinions"?"
Now come on, that's a little challenging for most QOTW'ers.
And wouldnt get quite as much WAAAAAAH look at me attention.
( M o D, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 13:50, closed)

i think i'd rather have that much chili in my vag
than this much sand. get over yourselves. no-one died. and i guarantee it's no worse than the dose of clap he could easily have got form her hooring it up unprotected, so STFU.
(UppityDamnPrimate LET'S OPEN THIS F*CKING PIT UP, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 14:17, closed)

Just to change the subject,
am I the only one who, when he reads "STFU" thinks that it's text speak for "stuff you"? Maybe it's the fact I'm in my thirties and don't go in for these new-fangled acronyms, but it always takes me ages to work out that it means "shut the fuck up".

Just me?
(MrC. Having the most boring username on b3ta since 2004, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 14:23, closed)

up until this moment
i thought it was Stuff you...

and will carry on thinking so as its wayyy better.
(Dan dan dan They tik urh jerbs!!!, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 15:38, closed)

Yay!
I still read it as "stuff u", it's so much more fun.
(Adamish Time of death, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 15:50, closed)

Great
I'm not the only one!
(MrC. Having the most boring username on b3ta since 2004, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 15:57, closed)

You mean...
it DOESN'T mean "stuff you"? Booooo that's the saddest thing I've read on here today..
( Mellicious is made of candy, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:14, closed)

Actually
I think it's debatable as to whether it's actually sexual assault.

The intention was obviously to cause pain, to an area that is obviously sexualised. The intermediate act of insertion (regardless of whether it was by the ex or her new beau) doesn't negate any chain of causality.

For instance, if I were to balance a bucket of paint over a door, and you opened it, and it fell on you, I would be guilty of assault, regardless of the fact that you opened the door.

In the same way, if I poison your food, but someone else feeds it to you, I'm still guilty of poisoning.

Actually, I'm pretty sure this is sexual assault, in a legal sense at least.
(LickOutTheJamsMotherfuckers!, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 15:12, closed)

actually
having reconsidered, it's more like basic assault.

Sexual assault would usually involve coercion or physical force.

However, it could be assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
(LickOutTheJamsMotherfuckers!, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 16:18, closed)

High Horse
It's not acceptable nor is fucking a stranger without a condom behind your partners back. Her behavior could have had far worse consequences for them both. I think we have a bad case of permanent PMT here, otherwise known as feminism. I can feel the flames coming !
(nee22 NL ExPat, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 15:03, closed)

Flames? Sounds like they were in her crotch....
"Feminism is the radical idea that women are people." Don't confuse us feminists with silly folks that are man-haters or female supremacists! As a feminist ("one who believes in equality between the sexes"): Yes, it was nasty of him, but seems like it was fairly warranted. While painful, capsaicin doesn't cause any lasting harm. Not telling your partner that you're engaging in risky sexual behavior is MUCH more potentially harmful!
(herbivorous, Thu 2 Oct 2008, 5:21, closed)

FFS
To summarise -MOVE ON!!!

PS - I think this has enough notoriety to now be known as either the "chilldo" or "chilli-gate"
(dampwookie failing to understand everything from birth up to, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 16:07, closed)

Link
Can we have a link to the original post?

I'm in work and need to kill some time

Cheers,
(Fuckarma was masturbating into your handbag, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 16:27, closed)

an experiement...
maybe slyph should eat a chilli, just so we can actualy measure the effect of spices on a cunt, so we can get a more realistic idea of what the cheating whore/KMWIP's ex underwent. That way, we can decide if he was, indeed, a sadistic torturer.

By the way, what is a "fundy" terrorist? I'm thinking it's like a normal terrorist, but with more jokes...

I find it particularly ironic that Slyph finds it totally psychotic to play a (slightly misgided) prank on a cheating ex who hurt her partner deeply, but thinks it's justifiable to recommend anyone who disagrees with them to be "lynched". So, no Emo over-reaction there, then. Twat.
(Chad, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:05, closed)

Considering 2
years ago he was still in school, I reckon he's never actually had a girlfriend.
( Batshitmentalist is sane for once, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:28, closed)

I have no idea
what the hell anyone is talking about. I thought maybe the replies would clear up the initial confusion but instead there are obtuse references to chilli and rape and dildos. Where's B3TA again?
(Ktulu O'Ryleh float like a turd, sting like chlamydia, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:06, closed)

re-cap
KMWIP posted a "food revenge" story about putting chilli on his ex's dildo when he found out she had cheated on him after 8 years and had unprotected sex with her boss. He then had a message from a psycho claiming that, as she'd been raped many moons ago and the guy who abused her did something similar, that KMWIPs ex was entirely jsutified in cheating and that KMWIP was a rapist for playing what amounted to a practical joke on her.

At this point, all hell broke loose as the anti-men hairy-armpit brigade and the Emos came out of the woodwork to abuse KMWIP, whilsy getting pissy when anyone questioned a) their logic and b) the fact that we have many stories where women take revenge on men and nothing is seen as wrong with that.

Does that help?
(Chad, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:10, closed)

Thanks for clearing that up!
I didn't know what was going on either.
Poor KMWIP, he deserves interweb hugs for that! Guys shouldn't be treated in that way and it is fair enough for the woman to get punished. It's a lot nicer than what some other guys might have done!
heh heh heh childo...
( Mellicious is made of candy, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 17:29, closed)

To try and offset this a bit
Chad is not very bright. He fails to make the simple distinction between people with extreme views and people who just plain disagree with his particular idea of the world.He discounts their viewpoint by labelling them 'Emos' (sic), 'psychos' and various other silly little labels that just betray his red-top mentality. What actually happened was this:

www.b3ta.com/questions/sexualmisconceptions/post256486

where, as you can see, no-one suggested that it was OK for a woman to do something similar to a man, other than Chad himself.

Still, pretty interesting debate.
(jennymnemonic, Tue 30 Sep 2008, 23:33, closed)

Jenny...
Thanks for the personal insults. You claim I am "not very bright", but the BSc in Chemistry and the successful career I have been enjoying would tend to negate that. I contend that a school-age Goth who makes snide comments on his own posts about playing pranks on girls, then jumps on the bandwagon to berate KMWIP (I'm looking at you Slyph) is indeed an attention-grabbing "Emo" - the label, if you like, fits. As for the "psycho" tag - I'm sure that you have a much more PC term for someone who projects past behaviour on to total strangers and then verbally assaults them on that basis, but again, if the cap fits, I suggest they wear it - they are obviously mentally unbalanced.

I actually made the point that KMWIP was getting a kicking from all and sundry for what amounted to a childish prank on a cheating girlfriend.

By the way, the person who PM'ed him effectively said it was fine for a girl to cheat on her partner and that the partner should accept it would happen and not react in any way whatsoever - remember that whole "relationship overlap" bullshit?

If we are to be unbiased, then either KMWIP should be cut some slack, those girls who posted such storues should have been villified in a similar manner. I contend that the sexist attitude is the one that is saying it's ok for women to do what the hell they please if they feel slighted, but if a man reacts at all he's a criminal bastard.

Either the truth is that everyone has the right to these petty acts of vengeance when cheated upon, etc, or no-one does, regardless of age, gender, race, religion or sexuality. Of course, the Guardian-reading contingent will argue that the rights of women/lesbians/albanian hunchbacks/whatever are far more important than those of anyone else and thus they should be given latitude that is not applied to your average white middle-class male of voting age and who prefers women as sexual partners. This is wrong - we live in a society that claims to be fair, yet 99 times out of a 100 a woman would get custody of the children in a divorce, regardless of the circumstances, a white person would struggle to make a racial discrimintation charge stick and a man would be laughed at if he claimed his female boss sexually harrassed him.

I'm not a bigot, despite what has been claimed by others, I am a realist - there are many examples on this very site of female posters playing the "woman scorned" card when taking revenge on an ex and we all took it in good humour, yet a male poster does the same and gets beaten down by the lefties.

All this is occuring on a board which condones jokes about Madeline MCann and Josef Fritzl, by the way. Either we take such posts in good humour and laugh at the mental image of flames shooting out of the offending minge, or we go all serious and shouty and, if that is the case, we have to do that for everyone - not just those who aren't protected by the boundaries of Political Correctness. If it's ok to laugh a girl's tale of kicking a bloke in the nuts, or pissing in his shampoo, etc, then it is perfectly acceptable for a guy to do the same to a girl. Either both get approval, or neither do - any other viewpoint is bigoted, which is ironic, as the fact that I pointed this out caused you to label me as one of the nasty bigoted people. The truth is that I accept people at face value and treat them all equally - you are assuming that people such as KMWIP are somehow given less leeway or freedom as the disabled black lesbians amongst us, when both the law of the land and any sense of decent morality would suggest that no-one should be victimised regardless of who they are. But it was ok to victimise KMWIP because he's a "he" and therefore can't rely on the "woman scorned" card to justify his prank. I've had enough of debating this, because it's obvious the close-minded bigots are those who believe that their viewpoint is right and if we don't agree with the vitriol they spewed in a flurry of PC tirades, then we must be evil.

Frankly, it's sickening to watch them go after someone like a pack of jackals.
(Chad, Wed 1 Oct 2008, 11:41, closed)

AAARGGGHHHH
Motherfuckers. Get over it for fucks sake. Did KMWIP do anything to you? No. Is he a rapist? No. Does anyone other than the lezzas and other feminist terrorists give a flying fuck? No they don't so stop posting random comments about it for fucks sake. Slyph, you appear to not get what this site is all about. Its not motherfucking facetwat or whatever, so expect some stuff that is both nasty and at the same time funny as fuck. Also don't say Out at the end of your messages it makes you look like an idiotic American teenage scrubber who is desperate for attention and trying to be all "Urban" and "Street". It just makes you like like a twat.

Hopefully legless is reading this as his seems to be one of the few voices of reason in this and he has funny as fuck stories.

So in summary

1. Slyph, shut the fuck up
2. Everyone stop pissing about Childo
3. Legless, tell me a story about you and denty fucking some bird while one of you watches or whatever you normally get up to to make me laugh.

In
(Commander Cool, Wed 1 Oct 2008, 8:38, closed)

My Tuppence (not thripenny bit)
I read KMWIP story and it made me laugh , it was fitting in with the story and the general humour of the site.

I'm pretty certain that he had no idea how much damage he could potentially cause as was high lighted in the PM he got.

However, people need to remember that this is a site about stories that can be funny, sad or boring.

The reply that was PM'd was also pretty extreme and from someone who has had a bad experience but they should not be taking it out on someone who, in all honesty, did something as a prank and that wasn't meant to be as harsh as it could have turned out.

Sylph: you appear to be male and a goth (not sure if this is still true on either count). It looks like you came to this debate just to have a bit of an argument?

FUCK OFF!

You've been a member of B3ta for 4 years, you know what the humour is like!

PLus just read through your old stories and saw this:

- Holding an airsoft gun to a terrified female companion's head. I know, i'm a baaaaaad person. It was appealing to my attraction to

- That scene in the man with the golden gun

Apologies for length, girth and calibre.
(Slyph, Sun 5 Feb 2006, 12:19, More)

tit.

KMIP: I like your stories as they always make me laugh, keep up the good work (whether true or not)
(Fuckarma was masturbating into your handbag, Wed 1 Oct 2008, 9:33, closed)

Safe,
Sane, Consentual. The girl in question had a massive movie villain fetish.
(Slyph, Wed 1 Oct 2008, 18:17, closed)

You're suggesting that people you accuse of being insensitive to the significance of their subject matter
should be murdered by hanging?

You make points well, don't you?
( Mockingbird Practitioner of SCIENCE, Thu 2 Oct 2008, 15:49, closed)