
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 10:51,
archived)

the government has made cuts in areas which were too vulnerable to cut. Benefits have been reduced, less jobs for uneducated/unqualified people, funds have been and are being reallocated away from hospitals in more deprived areas of England, less money allocated to community development schemes and social housing... etc. Again, in case this angers anyone that I'm not appearing to jump on the all-out hatred wagon, I'm not justifying, sympathising etc *yawn* that's enough.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 10:59,
archived)

I've been unemployed, I've been bored, I've been angry.
Oddly, I've never thought to loot and burn down a shop to get what I want, though, I've always been under the impression that I should get a job and earn the money to get what I want. Clearly I was wrong about this. I'm going to start mugging grannies - they tend to go down like a sack of spuds once you hit them.
I take it McDonald's aren't taking on staff these days. Or Starbucks. Or Burger King. Or Greggs. Or the council.
Yeah. I'm not happy. I think I might go and torch something. It's my right (I know my rights). What are they gonna do? The prisons are full - give me an ASBO? I'll wear it.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:05,
archived)
Oddly, I've never thought to loot and burn down a shop to get what I want, though, I've always been under the impression that I should get a job and earn the money to get what I want. Clearly I was wrong about this. I'm going to start mugging grannies - they tend to go down like a sack of spuds once you hit them.
I take it McDonald's aren't taking on staff these days. Or Starbucks. Or Burger King. Or Greggs. Or the council.
Yeah. I'm not happy. I think I might go and torch something. It's my right (I know my rights). What are they gonna do? The prisons are full - give me an ASBO? I'll wear it.

others have not.
We can either ignore that environments exist in which people are brought up to display such behaviour or seek to deal with the reasons for it.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:14,
archived)
We can either ignore that environments exist in which people are brought up to display such behaviour or seek to deal with the reasons for it.

"Being poor" is not an excuse. I know plenty of people - some of whom don't even have their own butlers - who are impecably behaved, despite having been brought up very much on the wrong side of the tracks.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:19,
archived)

What you've just said there is pretty much "chavs because chavs".
Once again, though, you might be right. The whole thing might just be noise.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:23,
archived)
Once again, though, you might be right. The whole thing might just be noise.

poor health and education of parents are factors.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:29,
archived)

Being brought up badly would explain why that person then brings someone else up badly.
From a lot of comments I've seen dismissing any idea of upbringing being a factor, I think a lot of people don't like the idea that we can be raised to be bad, simply because it means that our personalities are merely a product of luck, rather than some magical unchangable thing special to ourselves.
That said, excusing the violence entirely because of 'society' is not only dumb, but incredibly patronising to people from the same backgrounds who do not act like that.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:44,
archived)
From a lot of comments I've seen dismissing any idea of upbringing being a factor, I think a lot of people don't like the idea that we can be raised to be bad, simply because it means that our personalities are merely a product of luck, rather than some magical unchangable thing special to ourselves.
That said, excusing the violence entirely because of 'society' is not only dumb, but incredibly patronising to people from the same backgrounds who do not act like that.

I agree with your stance.
It was more a general comment on many comments I've seen that do seem completely divided down two extreme opinions, and refusing to accept that it can be both the individual and society to blame.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:54,
archived)
It was more a general comment on many comments I've seen that do seem completely divided down two extreme opinions, and refusing to accept that it can be both the individual and society to blame.

that's even more baffling territory. I'm a bit afraid the riots will be used to argue for all sorts of harsh and primitive discipline, and cause pointless heartache and pain and screwed-upness for future generations, who will still riot anyway.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:21,
archived)

The whole thing flags up lots of long-term problems which need fixing - schooling etc, but I suspect that they will all be ignored for quick fixes in dealing with crime after the event.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:49,
archived)

and blaming the riots on a failure of parents to say "no". And then the parents say "no" to their kids a lot, thinking that they're instilling a sense of discipline and obedience, resulting in kids who are both angrier and more ignorant (because they haven't been allowed experiences), and worse at relating to people (because any attempt at negotiation over something they want just leads to "no").
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:03,
archived)

Just because the rioters are "criminal scum", does not mean it is not sensible to work out (and implement) ways of reducing the production of "criminal scum" attitudes in the future.
Edit: it's nice that y'all can pattern match and work out that vandals/looters are antisocial criminals. But pattern matching gives only a diagnosis, it isn't a cure. A cure involves understanding the dynamics of how people come to behave like that, and working to change or control those dynamics.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:58,
archived)
Edit: it's nice that y'all can pattern match and work out that vandals/looters are antisocial criminals. But pattern matching gives only a diagnosis, it isn't a cure. A cure involves understanding the dynamics of how people come to behave like that, and working to change or control those dynamics.

I notice there aren't any angry responses to this. Is it because you're more concise, or simply because you're absolutely right?
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 22:10,
archived)

I think standard JSA and housing benefit are still the same (though there were some rumblings about changing the latter soon, I don't think it's happened yet). The threshold for what counts as disability was changed, I think, but is that all?
I'm not sure which publicly-funded jobs employ the unqualified. I don't think a vast number of unqualified workers have been sacked from employment by the government, but I might be wrong. I think in the riot-struck cities there is still plenty of shitwork in factories, and was even through the recession.
The rioting isn't happening the deprived areas of England, it's happening in the biggest cities.
Still, cuts make people generally cross. Cuts are a factor. Then you have to ask whether they're a thing to blame and regret, or not.
Like how if I go out dressed in an extraordinarily sexually provocative way and get raped, the way I dressed was a factor, but it's not to blame.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:11,
archived)
I'm not sure which publicly-funded jobs employ the unqualified. I don't think a vast number of unqualified workers have been sacked from employment by the government, but I might be wrong. I think in the riot-struck cities there is still plenty of shitwork in factories, and was even through the recession.
The rioting isn't happening the deprived areas of England, it's happening in the biggest cities.
Still, cuts make people generally cross. Cuts are a factor. Then you have to ask whether they're a thing to blame and regret, or not.
Like how if I go out dressed in an extraordinarily sexually provocative way and get raped, the way I dressed was a factor, but it's not to blame.

Lack of social care, support and education contributes to people developing a disrespect for society, police, etc. My suggestions before were possible factors that cause collective frustration and anger.
I work in social care just now and am constantly trying to encourage the kids I work with to respect the police and the law, but I often see that they don't give a fuck, because they don't have anything to aspire to. The kids that show the most potential to become model citizens are the ones I and others have managed to motivate to get jobs, though actually getting them jobs has been slow and very difficult. Others, where they have no prospects have a kind of learned helplessness and don't feel the need to adhere to any rules, be that a result of peers, upbringing, helplessness, lack of education, whatever. It is a wider societal problem that is at the moment being expressed by these riots. The problems need to be addressed by the government or things will only get worse.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:26,
archived)
I work in social care just now and am constantly trying to encourage the kids I work with to respect the police and the law, but I often see that they don't give a fuck, because they don't have anything to aspire to. The kids that show the most potential to become model citizens are the ones I and others have managed to motivate to get jobs, though actually getting them jobs has been slow and very difficult. Others, where they have no prospects have a kind of learned helplessness and don't feel the need to adhere to any rules, be that a result of peers, upbringing, helplessness, lack of education, whatever. It is a wider societal problem that is at the moment being expressed by these riots. The problems need to be addressed by the government or things will only get worse.

as I prefer to discuss weighty matters with people I know in real life.
I agree with some of your arguments but also empathise with Vagabond's point of view, and ultimately, like _Felix I think, I believe that there's a middle ground (please visit me on my fence sometime).
Anyway, all I reall wanted to add is that I think the last line of your post above is correct and verry very important.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:41,
archived)
I agree with some of your arguments but also empathise with Vagabond's point of view, and ultimately, like _Felix I think, I believe that there's a middle ground (please visit me on my fence sometime).
Anyway, all I reall wanted to add is that I think the last line of your post above is correct and verry very important.

I'm guessing "employ more people in public services" - right?
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:46,
archived)

But I believe rhetoric from both government and opposition politicians achieves nothing and that long-term positive action (whatever that is) by government rather than negative quick-fixes is the way to make the current situation less rather than more likely in future.
( ,
Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:57,
archived)