final collectors edition aims to sell an extra few million copies
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 7:34,
archived)
And about fucking time, too.
Now we just need to convince Rupert to not publish the fucking thing at all.
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 7:35,
archived)
Not particularly.
I'm just not a fan of casual misogyny. Or Rupert Murdoch.
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 8:32,
archived)
I've always wanted to shag Velma
Not that it's ever going to happen.
She is a lesbian after all.
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 13:56,
archived)
She is a lesbian after all.
WHAT?! Oh no...
Well, on the upside, maybe we can watch her making out with her lesbo lover.
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 15:20,
archived)
But what will all the stunners do now?
haha
if anyone's up for a discussion, I'd like top propose that this is a double edged sword
firstly, and most importantly, fuck the Sun, fuck Rupert Murdoch, fuck objectifying women, fuck lad bantz, fuck sex as a commodity. banning page 3 is a win.
secondly, isn't it a shame that the human body isn't allowed to be on display. Is this a move away from liberal ideas of freedom of expression and celebrating what we have? has society succumb to pressure from people telling us we should return to move Victorian values?
(I'm weighted 90% firstly, 10% secondly, and am just curious to see peoples opinions, because I always thought page 3 was shite, but liked that we could at least live in a society where nipples weren't evil. perhaps wanting a more mature attitude like on the continent where the human body wasn't so taboo)
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 12:14,
archived)
if anyone's up for a discussion, I'd like top propose that this is a double edged sword
firstly, and most importantly, fuck the Sun, fuck Rupert Murdoch, fuck objectifying women, fuck lad bantz, fuck sex as a commodity. banning page 3 is a win.
secondly, isn't it a shame that the human body isn't allowed to be on display. Is this a move away from liberal ideas of freedom of expression and celebrating what we have? has society succumb to pressure from people telling us we should return to move Victorian values?
(I'm weighted 90% firstly, 10% secondly, and am just curious to see peoples opinions, because I always thought page 3 was shite, but liked that we could at least live in a society where nipples weren't evil. perhaps wanting a more mature attitude like on the continent where the human body wasn't so taboo)
happy to
it is a little chilly though, you wouldn't quite be getting your money's worth right now...
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 13:10,
archived)
the human body is allowed to be on display
but it's not newsworthy
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 12:44,
archived)
?
So you're suggesting that what's on pages 1-2 and 4-28 of The Sun is news?
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 12:47,
archived)
what ferret said
there are plenty of places to look at nuditidity, art galleries, photo exhibits, actual people, wank mags and everywhere online.
The human body is a wonderous thing that should be admired, but that's not what page 3 was about
( ,
Tue 20 Jan 2015, 13:10,
archived)
The human body is a wonderous thing that should be admired, but that's not what page 3 was about