
Hi Rob,
I'm researching a feature for The Sydney Morning Herald about online sexuality -- especially the explosion in sexblogs and what it all means. (The feature is due to be published this Saturday).
I'm seeking comments from a wide variety of people, including web publishers such as yourself.
This will probably sound trite ..... but the more I explore the topic, the more it seems that a post-porn sexual revolution is gathering steam online... While the Christian Right may seem ascendant in the offline world, the opposite seems to be occurring online....
Commercial porn seems to be losing market share to a wave of free, community-generated (and Web 2.0-inspired?) sexblogs, cam girls, erotic podcasts, Flickr galleries, YouTube videos, dating sites and even porn parody... (Although analysts insist the porn industry is booming online, I can't imagine how they are any better off than the music industry ... Bittorrent seems full of pirated porn videos and it seems clear that far more ``porn'' is being viewed in the blogosphere than on professional porn sites.)
If you have a few moments, I would very much appreciate any brief comments on the following....
1. Why the explosion in sex blogs/erotic podcasts/saucy Flickr galleries, etc? Are we ``reclaiming'' sex from online pornographers? Is this a new sexual revolution? If not, why the sudden mass exhibitionism?
2. What are the broader implications of moving from the 'old model' where the adult industry sold sexual content behind a ``members only'' gate that required a credit-card.... to a free-for-all where explicit sex is part of the Internet's fabric? (Will the porn industry disappear? Will kids have sex earlier? Will child porn become a worse scourge?)
3. What can we expect from a world where every aspect of sex is in plain view and openly discussed?
** I'd welcome comments -- I'd also be grateful for other contacts who might have informed views on this topic.
Thanks so much,
Sincerely,
The Sydney Morning Herald
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:38,
archived)
I'm researching a feature for The Sydney Morning Herald about online sexuality -- especially the explosion in sexblogs and what it all means. (The feature is due to be published this Saturday).
I'm seeking comments from a wide variety of people, including web publishers such as yourself.
This will probably sound trite ..... but the more I explore the topic, the more it seems that a post-porn sexual revolution is gathering steam online... While the Christian Right may seem ascendant in the offline world, the opposite seems to be occurring online....
Commercial porn seems to be losing market share to a wave of free, community-generated (and Web 2.0-inspired?) sexblogs, cam girls, erotic podcasts, Flickr galleries, YouTube videos, dating sites and even porn parody... (Although analysts insist the porn industry is booming online, I can't imagine how they are any better off than the music industry ... Bittorrent seems full of pirated porn videos and it seems clear that far more ``porn'' is being viewed in the blogosphere than on professional porn sites.)
If you have a few moments, I would very much appreciate any brief comments on the following....
1. Why the explosion in sex blogs/erotic podcasts/saucy Flickr galleries, etc? Are we ``reclaiming'' sex from online pornographers? Is this a new sexual revolution? If not, why the sudden mass exhibitionism?
2. What are the broader implications of moving from the 'old model' where the adult industry sold sexual content behind a ``members only'' gate that required a credit-card.... to a free-for-all where explicit sex is part of the Internet's fabric? (Will the porn industry disappear? Will kids have sex earlier? Will child porn become a worse scourge?)
3. What can we expect from a world where every aspect of sex is in plain view and openly discussed?
** I'd welcome comments -- I'd also be grateful for other contacts who might have informed views on this topic.
Thanks so much,
Sincerely,
The Sydney Morning Herald

1. If it's available for free then why pay
2. Everything'll stay the same
3. Profit
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:40,
archived)
2. Everything'll stay the same
3. Profit

"Dear Diary. Last night I porked. The night before, I cracked one off.
Current mood: emo"
?


without leaving the house might have something to do with it all. And I don't mean cyber, I mean going to meet someone knowing you've got a dead certain shag.
Just something to consider.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:42,
archived)
Just something to consider.

.. apart from that road around the corner from Caledonian Road station
.. as I discovered on Saturday when I got propositioned by a crack whore for the first time ever
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:44,
archived)
.. as I discovered on Saturday when I got propositioned by a crack whore for the first time ever

"You're looking for a good time?"
"No, I'm looking for a bus"
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:45,
archived)
"No, I'm looking for a bus"

walking from my house in Islington down to King's Cross to meet some lads. She started with bumming a fag from me and within 30 secinds was offering to teach me all of the carnal pleasures of ancient Rome in a back alley for 25 quid. She was not best pleased when I insisted that I would be having a much greater time with a Big Mac followed by a cold beer. I love the Toms in London, great fun.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:49,
archived)

I thought you were teh master of the internet!
Alt.com, AFF ... it's where the masses copulate, don't you know!
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:45,
archived)
Alt.com, AFF ... it's where the masses copulate, don't you know!

that insiste only that you go as a mixed couple. Once through the door there are different rooms and you can't see very much. After that anything can, and does, go.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:46,
archived)

and "go to meet someone"?
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:46,
archived)

get laid without going out and talking to people in bars and having to think about appearance. Being able to think quite carefully about responses in online conversation, which eliminates disaster conversations.
In short, distance and keyboards bring people together who would never actually a) meet, or b) give each other a second glance if they did.
Ya dig?
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:52,
archived)
In short, distance and keyboards bring people together who would never actually a) meet, or b) give each other a second glance if they did.
Ya dig?

this results in 90% casual sex, and 10% disaster relationships, but hey, it's social progression.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:56,
archived)

Oh come on, I mean my writing fees... dirty sods.

Damn you, thought I'd finally forgotten that stuff.
Was still far better than that Pokemon shite.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:46,
archived)
Was still far better than that Pokemon shite.

It's a very amusing cover though.
Paedophilia would be loilta or shota, not yaoi. Pffft.
( ,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 0:03,
archived)
Paedophilia would be loilta or shota, not yaoi. Pffft.

One of my friends knows a dude who was 13 pretending to be 17 saying he was 15 or something.
He's called Gerald the reverse paedophile.
( ,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 0:08,
archived)
He's called Gerald the reverse paedophile.

He said "member"... pfffft!
Oooh! And I said "Number 2"
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:44,
archived)
Oooh! And I said "Number 2"

then it just started getting all "porn yadda yadda porn yadda sex porn yadda belgian dwarves
yadda yadda spanky goodness yadda yadda hamster yadda with a cold northerly wind"
I am off to claim more of the sandwich stash that has amazingly appeared in my fridge
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:44,
archived)
yadda yadda spanky goodness yadda yadda hamster yadda with a cold northerly wind"
I am off to claim more of the sandwich stash that has amazingly appeared in my fridge

I've missed your wonderful madness! Come back! And bring me sandwiches!
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:47,
archived)

I was out in the real world for a while. But it's too bright and noisy out there, so I came back inside
*offers up an egg sandwich*
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:48,
archived)
*offers up an egg sandwich*

The internet is littered with porn, free galleries are the norm. I also feel it's over abundance creates a sense of boredom with the whole thing. I would much rather look at a flickr site of college girls having fun on their 'spring/winter/summer breaks' dressed in bikinis than any 'deep anal penetration whilst sucking another 3 men off'
call me weird. Just call me.
949.867.5309
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:46,
archived)
call me weird. Just call me.
949.867.5309

pointing out stuff like SecondLife to him too. Masses of free love going on there.
But more on topic, that whole safety buffer of online life thing. People have always been filthy, and always wanted to be filthy with each other but were rarely allowed to be in normal society. It's natural that once you're safe on the other side of your monitor you're going to express yourself in ways you feel you're not allowed to outside. The sex indusrty cashed in on people's desires reaching a point where they would actually pay to get some kind of voice for thier inner feelings. but i reckon that's not the case anymore.
( ,
Mon 31 Oct 2005, 23:51,
archived)
But more on topic, that whole safety buffer of online life thing. People have always been filthy, and always wanted to be filthy with each other but were rarely allowed to be in normal society. It's natural that once you're safe on the other side of your monitor you're going to express yourself in ways you feel you're not allowed to outside. The sex indusrty cashed in on people's desires reaching a point where they would actually pay to get some kind of voice for thier inner feelings. but i reckon that's not the case anymore.

what you are looking for is here
ahhahaahahhahaahhahahahah
( ,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 0:00,
archived)
ahhahaahahhahaahhahahahah

1. because the technology (camera/web) is available and cheap and more people know how to use it; the exhibitionism is old, only the technology to make it mass is new
2. no difference; it's the same bodies and the same acts, just people prepared to do it for fun undercutting the business. no reason for it to increase child porn, your cause and effect is messed up there, it's not supply driven.
3. oooh, honesty and lack of hang ups. possibly. new taboos. also possible.
as an aside, free porn on the net pre-dates the world wide web... it's only quantity that's changed...
( ,
Tue 1 Nov 2005, 0:04,
archived)
2. no difference; it's the same bodies and the same acts, just people prepared to do it for fun undercutting the business. no reason for it to increase child porn, your cause and effect is messed up there, it's not supply driven.
3. oooh, honesty and lack of hang ups. possibly. new taboos. also possible.
as an aside, free porn on the net pre-dates the world wide web... it's only quantity that's changed...