Why is there the animosity towards people who start a new thread
( , Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:09, archived)
( , Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:09, archived)
There is an element of hamtouchery about it.
But I believe that is the desired effect he desired.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:17,
archived)
Haha!
What I like best about this thread is the utter indignation from those who haven't seen it.
This juxtaposes the ridicule excellently.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:18,
archived)
This juxtaposes the ridicule excellently.
You have a kettle down here?
My, This is a posh bunker
*edit* 'ning if I haven't said so already. If not, how rude of me.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:14,
archived)
*edit* 'ning if I haven't said so already. If not, how rude of me.
'ning - you hadn't, but I hadn't noticed, so we're all cool.
Posh bunker? Thank you - I went for all the options.
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:23,
archived)
i'm loving these
fantastic work, dude
EDIT: ning all! skiving day today!
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:10,
archived)
EDIT: ning all! skiving day today!
As this is a pointless thread anyway...
Has anyone got that picture of the special reserve police - replacing proper coppers with cameras and retards or something?
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:11,
archived)
Hello....
Do you want some asbestos pants? Going cheap!.... i have a feeling that you might need them
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:12,
archived)
I don't know
it says you can within reason, just as long you don't simply say "I had chips for tea" or something equally stupid as that is a rather pointless thing to push someones work off the board with.
But why not have a bit of a chat in an existing thread. You know, like you're in an art gallery stood in front of a painting :)
( ,
Mon 4 Dec 2006, 11:15,
archived)
But why not have a bit of a chat in an existing thread. You know, like you're in an art gallery stood in front of a painting :)